Nowhere in the relationship
rule book does it say that you have to have the same approach to finances as your spouse.
Most of the agents following
the rule book do so, but many don't do so.
Not exact matches
But I don't know of a
rule book that says we can't make amazing profits and not wreck the planet at the same time.
Since everyone at the outset is
doing multiple jobs and since you can't be everywhere at once, you've got to trust your people to
do the right things in the moment, since there's no
rule book, no time for extensive preparation and instruction, and there's rarely a second chance to make a great first impression with a lot of new and prospective customers.
«That set of
rules and those thought processes are so ingrained in society today that it's hard to communicate exactly what the vision is, and I think «Reinventing Organizations»
does a better job than any other
book on communicating that vision and communicating that this is not just a hypothetical like, «Oh, wouldn't it be cool if we
did this,»» Bunch said.
The
book Brain
Rules explains how detrimental «multitasking» can be: Research shows your error rate goes up 50 percent and it takes you twice as long to
do things.»
«What the little one has to
do is figure out what the big one either is structurally unable to
do because the
rule book says you can't, or they're unwilling to
do because they don't have that entrepreneurial spirit,» he told «The Brave Ones».
«What the little one has to
do is figure out what the big one either is structurally unable to
do because the
rule book says you can't, or they're unwilling to
do because they don't have that entrepreneurial spirit.»
Follow the platinum
rule, which authors Tony Alessandra and Michael J. O'Connor defined in their book The Platinum Rule, «Do unto others as they'd like done unto them.&ra
rule, which authors Tony Alessandra and Michael J. O'Connor defined in their
book The Platinum
Rule, «Do unto others as they'd like done unto them.&ra
Rule, «
Do unto others as they'd like
done unto them.»
In a long discussion about her new
book, Creative Conspiracy: The New
Rules of Breakthrough Collaboration, on Kellogg insight recently, Thompson takes a long detour into the psychology of conflict and what leaders can
do to ensure their teams fight in a healthy and productive way.
Notice that I didn't write that the
rule book is written by the «evil» franchisor.
(The one exception to this
rule is 37signals, whose
book RE: THINK
does talk about right - sizing your business, even if that you're both the first and the last employee.)
But the NEB
ruled that Kinder Morgan's effort to shift responsibility for cleanup off their
books simply
did not meet the Board's legal requirements:
To ensure that relations between the auditor and the audited company
do not become too cozy, members of the European Parliament approved a mandatory rotation
rule whereby an auditor may inspect a company's
books for a maximum of 14 years, which could be increased to 25 years if safeguards are put in place.
He didn't write any
books, but he
did leave his investing
rules.
At least, that's what the Fed must
do if it follows its
rule book.
Although people understood the
rules of open
book management, at first they didn't see the point of adding yet another meeting to their busy schedules.
And so
do many others — 12
Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos is currently the number one bestselling
book on Amazon.
The Pope is basically just like an Umpire in a Baseball game — he keeps the game going and indicates what's in play or not, by the written
rule book — but
does not change the
rules of the game — that's set.
Life is full of possibilities as long as you don't let yourself be
ruled from an ultimate authority or ultimate
book or ultimate wisdom.
The problem with your argument is most gods on this planet have
rule books, you can't have the freedom to
do as you want if you believe in those particular gods.
I don't see any hate at all coming from gays toward Christians but I don't see how you could blame gays if they
did hate Christians - the Christian
book of
rules says to kill gays.
Once they have recruits for a while they gradually reveal strange
rules and beliefs based upon the
book of Mormon which is another
book that doesn't agree with the Gospel.
... i know your
book says don't believe anything else before or after to protect its place in history, but just as you would read greek mythology and have incredulous thoughts about multigods
ruling the earth water and the undergrounds, those who are not stuck on your wavelength, read your mythology and think how anyone in their right minds could ever fall for those idolatric stories... your belief in your creationist god is as unfathomable as an adult looking up the chimney and feeling the power of Santa Clause in them...
does the power of Santa Clause compel you?
do I need any approval before I practice my religion,
do I have to prove my religion before I practice, my holy
book further describe that you must carry a gun in 21st century because there is too much crime in this world, but it doesn't say much about if I migrate to another country these
rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like talking in English which is not my religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing in line or not, I am so confused what should I
do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my religion originated or back in time ask my guru questions about western world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.
What she
did was wrong in the JW
book of
rules.
26, page 635... Now, in all fairness, their has been a Public Relations campaign recently to remove the «cursed» references to Blacks in the ever changing
Book of Mormon / and Covenants and Doctrines — «specially since they have a chance to
rule the world through Mitt Romney (gggrandson of one of the LDS church founders, Parley Pratt arrested for murder and treason for attacking and killing members of an army battalion)... Don't look in up in Wikipedia — the Mormons have deleted that part of Pratt's history.
Most importantly, note this: I am a Christian, I'm gay, I'm a recovering alcoholic, I believe in Evolution, I believe the universe is 13 billion years old and that the Earth is 4.5 or so billion years old, I believe man evolved from lower primates and that Adam was the first man who God gave a soul and sentience, I
do not believe in hell but I
do believe in Satan, I
do not believe the Bible is a
book of rules meant to imprison man or condemn him but that it is rather a «Human Existence for Dummies» guide, I believe Christ was the son of God but I do not believe Christianity is the only «valid» religion, I do not believe atheists will go to hell, while the English Bible says God should be feared, the Hebrew word used for fear, «yara», such as that used in the Book of Job, actually means respect / reverence, not fear as one would fear death or a spi
book of
rules meant to imprison man or condemn him but that it is rather a «Human Existence for Dummies» guide, I believe Christ was the son of God but I
do not believe Christianity is the only «valid» religion, I
do not believe atheists will go to hell, while the English Bible says God should be feared, the Hebrew word used for fear, «yara», such as that used in the
Book of Job, actually means respect / reverence, not fear as one would fear death or a spi
Book of Job, actually means respect / reverence, not fear as one would fear death or a spider.
We're not the ones whining that our non-existent holy
books rules are not being paid attention to - LGBT rights violates your beliefs; women having control over their bodies violates your rights - I care that you don't get to stop that stuff.
Athiests don't have a sick
rule book that they use as a basis to allege superiority over other human beings.
In his
book In Praise of Play, Robert Neale discusses in detail these perversions of play: when peace is «inaction»; when freedom is bondage to one need in our psyche which is dominant; when delight is turned into a work agenda; when illusion is maintained at the expense of other needs and is a form of mental illness; when the story is believed, the time limits ignored, and pretending becomes pretension; when a game is played at the expense of others, breaking the
rules; when the risk of adventure is perverted and the gamble removed or fatalistically accepted; or when play is
done in secret.
Sorry, you don't get to cherry pick
rules of right or wrong from a
book when nobody can live by all the
rules.
You don't have enough king James scripture verses in it for any Christian publisher to be interested in putting it out (I've talked to Christian agents about this, and they are as frustrated as the writers at how boxed in to rigid
rules Christian
books have to be) and that is a sad fact about
book publishing today.
This is what Jesus
did, and he walked the long road to the cross, and as a result, we know from the
book of Revelation, that he will return to claim the earth and
rule over it as God has promised.
Uh, yo — idiot since you aren't following the bible to the letter if your satan
did exist that's where you're going to be, lying is a major sin according to your
rule book, but since you have a severe reading comprehension problems, we all get why you can't even seem to follow that you're your lies about me proves that one.
I think it is important to note that atheists
do not have a source or authority or
book from which they derive their moral
rules or guidelines.
Since they are not stoning people to death for working on the sabbath I don't see why they feel the need to follow any of the other ridiculous
rules of their so - called holy
books.
The only widely accepted prohibition during the first Jihad was to not murder the «people of the
book», that would be Jews and Christians, but all of the people of the
book would have to under Muslim
rule and could not
do anything against Islam.
The reaction to
books like The Myth of God Incarnate is often contemptuous: Don't these authors know that the medieval
rules for the predication of attributes have solved all the problems they are dealing with?
So while there are few hard and fast
rules for keeping a Sabbath, Dan Allender paints a picture in his
book of spending time with friends and family, enjoying sumptuous meals, taking walks, enjoying long talks, and
doing whatever we find enjoyable in life.
I've noticed that many Christians see the Bible as a
book that's chock full of easy to follow laws and
rules that tell you what to
do (Paul said this so we must... they
did this so we must...) and proof texts (it says here that Jesus said that who ever is not for him is against him so I forbid you to listen to Britney Spears).
If you don't know whether or not you are dispensational, this
book will be a good read to introduce you to the idea that how we live now effects our future
rule and reign with Jesus Christ in eternity.
The
book rules over all we think and
do.
I know their strong position about same - sex marriage, and about women controlling their bodies and all of those things and I say if you write the
book, you have the
rules,
do what you have to
do.
I believe that in Jesus, God has
done away with all the laws,
rules, regulations, and
book keeping.
If you took the time to
do the research on your religious
books, you would also know that it's plagiarized off of other, older religions combined with the principles for religious
rule written down by Plato 400 years prior to the «New God» and the New Testament.
It's easy to put each other in a box or make a little
rule book for ourselves about what Good Christian Women
Do and Look Like and then even sub boxes below that about Schooling and Discipline and Food and so on.
President Obama sidestepped that piece of legislation when he opened up more embryo - stem - cell research, but the legislation remains on the statute
book, and as such the judge in August
ruled as he
did.
First, there are numerous times in the
book of Acts and in some of Paul's other letters where women appear to be speaking in the gatherings of the church with the approval of others, so whatever Paul is saying here, it
does not seem to be a
rule which he himself universally followed (Acts 16:14 - 15; Acts 18:26).
The connection between freedom and time (and between them and selfhood or personal identity) appears clearly in Sartre's insistence that the good novel present a self shaping an open future, not a puppet
ruled by the past whose end is contained in his beginning: «But in order for the duration of my impatience and ignorance to be caught and then moulded and finally presented to me as the flesh of these creatures of invention, the novelist must know how to draw it into the trap, how to hollow out in his
book, by means of signs at his disposal, a time resembling my own, one in which the future
does not exist.