Sentences with phrase «rule in cases of»

One will deal with cases of suspected violation of the code of ethics, while the other will rule in cases of appeal.

However, there are exceptions to this rule in cases of extreme negligence.

Saratoga County district attorney Charles B. Andrus, the county's government appeal agent, recently asked the district exemption board whether exceptions could be made to this rule in cases of obvious hardship.

The decision by NB Liquor comes just days after the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the case of Gerard Comeau who was fined in 2012 for bringing home cheaper beer and liquor he bought in neighbouring Quebec.

The U.S. judge has excluded foreign investors, based on a precedent set in a 2010 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Morrison v. National Australian Bank.

The Supreme Court has become a cause célèbre among evangelicals since the 1973 ruling in the case of Roe v. Wade (which effectively legalized abortion in America).

On April 22, 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling in the case of Interstate Circuit v. Dallas, which revolved around the film Viva Maria.

Whatever Marbury was supposed to mean about the scope of the power of judicial review, it is a notable fact that the Court declined to exercise that power to declare another act of Congress to be unconstitutional until 1857, when it ruled in the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford.

With the recent Supreme Court ruling in the case of Allegheny County v. ACLU, I believe a new and exciting chapter in the church - state debate may be evolving around Jewish attempts in Pittsburgh and other places to legitimate the display of Jewish religious symbols in the public square.

While the First Amendment would seem to provide the answer to these objections by limiting majority rule in the case of fundamental freedoms, minority faiths in America know all too well that even constitutional guarantees are not iron - clad.

You can work around this rule in the case of important events and appointments, but most of the time you should stay consistent.

Initially scheduled to report to prison on July 1, Silver's appeal has gained some ground in recent weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of ex-Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell that narrowed the definition of an official quid pro quo in public corruption cases.

Such legal distinctions are illustrated in the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell.

And, he blames the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Citizens United, allowing unlimited independent expenditures, as the reason.

Both times, the court cited a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Republican former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell that narrowed the definition of a corrupt act by a public official.

«These police commands were selected in direct response to the judges ruling in the case of Floyd versus the city of New York,» Bratton said during the press conference at police headquarters.

The same rules in the case of a Newbie apply here, follow if you know the person and if he has tweeted recently.

Just days after the announcement of the Foundation Update for No Man's Sky, we now have an official ruling in the case of the alleged misleading marketing campaign...

«Adapted from the novel by Ian McEwan, Emma Thompson and Stanley Tucci star in this riveting, complex drama of a family - court judge facing a personal and professional crisis when she's asked to rule in the case of a teenager who is refusing a life - saving blood transfusion due to his family's religious beliefs.»

The justices made the ruling in the case of Owasso Independent School Dist.

Last month, Denver District Judge Sheila Rappaport ruled in the case of Lobato vs. State of Colorado that Colorado's current public school finance system fails to meet state constitutional requirements to maintain a thorough and uniform public school system.

The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has recently started bracing itself for a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case of Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association.

This was the ruling in the case of DCIT Vs Tata Sons as listed here.

In 20120, the Circuit Court in Miami Dade ruled in the case of Cardelle v. Miami Dade Code Enforcement that the way the county was enforcing the law violated due process.

Last year the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Massachusetts v. EPA that the agency has to consider greenhouse gases as air pollutants that may need to be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

The Court ruled in the case of Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc. that B.C. courts have the power to make Google remove certain websites from its search -LSB-...]

In 2012, the Supreme Court reaffirmed and expanded on the principles laid out in the Gladue ruling in the case of R. v. Ipeelee.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of Missouri v. Jenkins that a law firm may charge for paralegal services at market rates, not just the actual cost to the firm.

The Seattle Times reports here that the Washington State Supreme Court has ruled in the case of State of Washington v. E.J.J.:

The SJC issued its ruling in the case of Rhodes v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc., 461 Mass. 486 (2012).

On February 12, 2016, the Supreme Judicial Court issued its ruling in the cases of DiCarlo v. Suffolk Construction Co., Inc. (SJC - 11854); Martin v. Angelini Plastering, Inc. (SJC - 11853).

On January 15, 2013, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg released its ruling in the cases of four Christian employees who argued that they suffered from discrimination and that their employers encroached upon their right to religious freedom at work.

Here, the AG refers to the Court ruling in the case of N.S. and others, and the Handbook for the processing of visa applications and the modification of issued visas, published by the Commission in 2010.

In its 1906 ruling in the case of State v. Koch, our Montana State Supreme Court ruled that «the jury has power to disregard the law as declared and acquit the defendant, however convincing the evidence may be, and that the court or judge has no power to punish them for such conduct.»

The combination of that decision and an earlier ruling in the case of The RBS Rights Issue Litigation [2016] EWHC 3161 has meant a tightening of the ability of corporates to assert legal professional privilege in the context of internal investigations.

We know that from two Supreme Court of Canada rulings in the case of Omar Khadr.

On March 13, The Florida Supreme Court ruled in the case of The Estate of Michelle Evette McCalll vs. the United States of America, overturning an existing cap of $ 500,000 for doctors and $ 1 million for hospitals and clinics on non-economic damages in wrongful death cases.

Eugene Volokh reports on a recent Ninth Circuit ruling in the case of Williams v. Cavazos in which a juror, who was reluctant to convict, was dismissed in the middle of deliberations: Dismissing a Holdout Juror in the Middle of Deliberations Because «His Mind Is Bent... Against the Prosecution»

On June 8, 2016, the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta released a 60 - page ruling in the cases of Kent v. Martin, and Kent v. Postmedia, awarding $ 150,000 in general damages for the print publication of a defamatory article, and a further $ 50,000 for continuing online publication.

The Seattle Times reports here that the Washington State Supreme Court has ruled in the case of State of Washington v. E.J.J.: «First Amendment protects profanity against police» A teenage boy...

«Detainees» Lawyers Oppose More Filings»: The Associated Press provides a report that begins, «Attorneys representing hundreds of Guantanamo Bay detainees urged a federal appeals court Monday to reject a Bush administration request for more legal filings in light of last week's Supreme Court ruling in the case of Osama bin Laden's driver.»

The ruling in the case of Mari and Kieran is that even when the property damage is caused not by the fault or negligence of an individual unit owner but simply due to defective plumbing or a malfunctioning appliance, that the condominium unit owner may still be held responsible for the damage.

L. 100 — 647 applicable to contracts entered into on or after June 21, 1988, with special rule where death benefit increases by more than $ 150,000, certain other material changes taken into account, certain exchanges permitted, and special rule in the case of annuity contracts, see section 5012 (e) of Pub.

Not exact matches

Irish Finance Minister Michael Noonan told CNBC Tuesday that the country would appeal to the ruling, restating Ireland's position that the «full amount of tax was paid in this case and no state aid was provided.»

In this case, a policy can mean a set of rules for employees to follow.

Army Col. Jeffery R. Nance, the military judge overseeing Bergdahl's case, had ruled in February that Trump's statements as a candidate (and, therefore, a private citizen) didn't rise to the level of undue command influence.

At the opening of the trial in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts, which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, said.

«This was a meticulously documented indictment, and certainly in the case of one of the individuals I think it opens the door to other matters and it emphasizes why the rule of law is so important, and that even includes the president,» said Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat.

Case in point: In mid-September, three weeks before Morneau tabled his rules, credit reporting agency TransUnion estimated that hundreds of thousands of Canadians carrying variable rate subprime mortgages could be significantly impacted by interest rate increases of even 25 basis pointin point: In mid-September, three weeks before Morneau tabled his rules, credit reporting agency TransUnion estimated that hundreds of thousands of Canadians carrying variable rate subprime mortgages could be significantly impacted by interest rate increases of even 25 basis pointIn mid-September, three weeks before Morneau tabled his rules, credit reporting agency TransUnion estimated that hundreds of thousands of Canadians carrying variable rate subprime mortgages could be significantly impacted by interest rate increases of even 25 basis points.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the case in which a court majority ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow said.