Sentences with phrase «rule in each case whether»

If only a «man» and a «woman» can get «married», then you have to have CLEAR definitions of all 3 terms so that you can rule in each case whether 2 people can «marry» or not.

Not exact matches

The IRS decides whether these arrangements are legal on a case - by - case basis, so the rules aren't set in stone.

Now, with Montgomery v. Louisiana, the court must decide whether that rule can be applied retroactively: Henry Montgomery, the plaintiff in that case, shot and killed a Louisiana sheriff when he was 17 years old — way back in 1963.

Unless rules governing narrow situations like this one are clearly spelled out, it would be hard to determine whether a company was simply conveying information or giving investment advice, in which case it would have to register as a broker - dealer.

US Supreme Court justices appeared unsure on Tuesday whether to rule against online TV startup Aereo in a major copyright case.

Observed the report: «The context in which the policy was adopted and even the issue of whether a rule or policy has been actually adopted are also important in these cases.»

The European Court of Justice is expected to rule this year in a major case centered on whether Uber should be treated as a taxi service, which would mean it was subject to rigorous safety and employment rules, or merely as an online platform connecting independent drivers and waiting passengers.

Be sure to ask whether your state regulator has received notice of the offering or, in the case of a Rule 504 offering, cleared the offering for sale in your state.

This is particularly true in cases where the new rules single out certain activities as especially concerning and impose further taxes, whether in the form of higher capital charges, more stringent regulatory supervision or activity - specific legal and regulatory costs and restrictions.

In difficult cases one asks not (for instance) whether the rule against murder has exceptions but whether this kind of case counts as murder - a question of analogical judgment.

However, it is certainly very much to be desired that a sober thinker would for once explain how far this purely logical process, which recalls the grammatical rule that two negatives make an affirmative, and the mathematical rule that two minuses are a plus — how far, I say, this logical process is valid in the world of reality, in the world of qualities; whether after all the qualities are not subject to a different dialectic; whether in this case «transition» does not play a different rôle.

The Conseil went beyond American case law, though, in announcing presumptive rules for display of a crèche that depend on whether the display is inside or outside a public building.

He then brought a new case in the federal courts to consider, among other things, whether a state could reverse the «once free, always free» principle under which the St. Louis County Court had ruled in Scott's favor.

The only thing that might come back to Trump is whether or not he was aware of the Stormy Daniels pay off, in which case, it's in violation with some rules of campaign finances.

What is debatable is whether performance in rule - application and case - handling should be judged to have got a bit worse or a lot worse on such evidence.

The judge in the case noted that Silver took a «number of official acts — most obviously passing legislation and approving state grants and tax - exempt financing — as part of a quid pro quo, but there remained a «substantial question» on whether the court's jury instructions were valid in light of the McDonnell ruling.

Gorsuch declined to say whether Roe vs. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion, was correctly decided more than four decades ago, but did say that if Trump had asked him to rule in a certain way involving Roe, «I would've walked out the door.

In many cases they are those who are allegedly responsible for observing whether the rules are observed.

The judge who will rule on the matter, state Supreme Court Judge Lisa Fisher — who was elected in a 2014 upset running as a Republican — noted at one point that there is «a thin line on whether the court can hear this case.»

Doug Burns, a former Eastern District prosecutor from Nassau County, said the «cardinal rule» in the government's use of a cooperating witness is «whether or not what they say can be backed up or corroborated by other evidence in the case.»

Saratoga County district attorney Charles B. Andrus, the county's government appeal agent, recently asked the district exemption board whether exceptions could be made to this rule in cases of obvious hardship.

But the rules governing whether a prosecutor must step down from a case in which they may have a conflict of interest are generally discretionary and left to the judgment of the prosecutor, the attorneys said.

With further seat reductions possible if further member states join the European Union, there may be a need to consider whether the rules shaping the redrawing of European election boundaries needs to be revised (to possibly allow for larger constituencies — even a national constituency) or to also consider whether there may be scope for using an alternative set of electoral rules (e.g. a List system) in the specific case of European elections, especially if the option of having one single constituency for the entire State was to be pursued at a later date.

Topics in the Q&A included the source of money for the City's planned pre-K advertising campaign, the City's target number of pre-K applicants, whether Speaker Silver thinks the proposed income tax surcharge should be pursued next year, how the pre-K selection process will work, how the City will cover the approximately $ 40 million annual gap between the estimated cost of pre-K and the amount provided in the state budget, when parents will learn whether their pre-K application has been accepted, how the City will collect data and measure success of the pre-K program, whether the existing pre-K application process will be changed, how the City will use money from the anticipated school bond issue, the mayor's reaction to a 2nd Circuit ruling that City may bar religious groups from renting after - hours space in public schools, the status on a proposed restaurant in Union Square, a tax break included in the state budget that provides millions of dollars to a Bronx condominium project, the «shop & frisk» meeting today between the Rev. Al Sharpton and Police Commissioner Bratton and a pending HPD case against a Brooklyn landlord.

A Manhattan Supreme Court justice recently ruled that the tenured professor can keep his position until a special hearing is held to determine whether he can stay on, but he has to post a $ 350,000 bond in case he loses so the school can easily recover his salary and other costs if it wins, The Post exclusively reported earlier this month.

The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the so - called Citizens United case, which allowed almost unchecked independent expenditures by corporations and unions, also made it nearly impossible for candidates to block outside campaign efforts, whether positive or negative — unlike direct campaign contributions.

As the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is busy girding itself for a fight over new greenhouse gas emissions rules, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments today in a case on whether lawsuits over climate ought to be permitted.

W: When you look at systems that self - organize into complex behaviors and understand what the rules are, the bigger question becomes whether there are situations in which your understanding of the individual cases can help you predict the behavior of the complex system.

Indeed, the preliminary ruling in the Roche case directly addressed the issue of informed consent, and hinged on whether Mr. Roche had given consent for the future implantation of any non-transferred embryos [75].

In ruling on any discovery dispute or extension request, the arbitrator shall take into consideration the nature, amount, and scope of the underlying arbitration claim, the cost and other effort what would be involved in providing the requested discovery, the case schedule, and whether the requested discovery is necessary for the adequate preparation of a claim or defensIn ruling on any discovery dispute or extension request, the arbitrator shall take into consideration the nature, amount, and scope of the underlying arbitration claim, the cost and other effort what would be involved in providing the requested discovery, the case schedule, and whether the requested discovery is necessary for the adequate preparation of a claim or defensin providing the requested discovery, the case schedule, and whether the requested discovery is necessary for the adequate preparation of a claim or defense.

Brett Myers, a Dallas lawyer representing Machete Productions, told Watchdog.org that the production company is considering whether to take their case to the U.S. Supreme Court after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled against them in December.

The Connecticut Supreme Court in 2010 ruled that every child is entitled to an «adequate» education, and sent the case back to the lower court to determine whether the state is providing that.

As for whether the school has a contingency plan in case the state Supreme Court rules that charter schools are unconstitutional, Chen said he's not too concerned right now.

In Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association et al., ten public school teachers are asking the High Court to strike down Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, a 1977 case that sanctioned agency shop rules that permit unions to dock a teacher's pay regardless of whether they want to be a member of a union and represented in union activitieIn Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association et al., ten public school teachers are asking the High Court to strike down Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, a 1977 case that sanctioned agency shop rules that permit unions to dock a teacher's pay regardless of whether they want to be a member of a union and represented in union activitiein union activities.

But the most serious concern about the consolidation rule is whether or not the scorers can accurately associate inquiries with the correct loan type — especially in the case of mortgages.

If you are not sure whether the statute of limitations applies in your case — the rules vary from state - to - state — simply ask the collection agency if your debt is «time - barred» meaning the statute of limitations has run out.

Whether you can process cruelty cases using contacts depends on the rules in your city / county / state.

If the defense had gone forward, whether the jury ruled in their favor or not, it would have made settling the other cases impossible — they would have spent the next five years in court.

In which case, double check to see whether there are any guidelines or rules to follow.

The court is currently hearing a substantive challenge to the interpretive rule, and in light of today's ruling, the hemp industry is optimistic that the Court will ultimately invalidate the DEA's rule, as one of the prime criteria in granting the Stay was whether the hemp industry is likely to ultimately prevail on the merits of the case.

ordvic, in each case whether it is a scientist that says something or a journalist that quotes them, the rule is to check the published reports and original press releases from the scientists, which tell you what is supported by what evidence.

In case there was any question about whether the three judge panel had lost patience with the states and industry groups, the Court focused briefly on a request to overturn the Timing Rule.

Little did I know that, in the dank toilet of DC justice, they can, on the one hand, have two trial judges simultaneously ruling on the same case while, on the other hand, be entirely unaware of whether their own anti-SLAPP law is appealable and thus require a decision from the Appeals Court on whether the law is appealable before the appeal can be appealed.

My question was I guess more whether it could really be ruled out, or whether it was obviously a ridiculous speculation on some other grounds... How you go about testing for a series of steps seems to be a bit of an issue in this case, given the amount of internal noise in the climate system..

In the simplest case, the total social benefit from level x of good X is simply a sum across individuals of the individual benefits that result from a level x of good X. (I'm glossing over some very interesting issues here, especially interpersonal comparability of benefit, and whether additivity is the right aggregation rule, but that's life in a vanilla utilitarian worldIn the simplest case, the total social benefit from level x of good X is simply a sum across individuals of the individual benefits that result from a level x of good X. (I'm glossing over some very interesting issues here, especially interpersonal comparability of benefit, and whether additivity is the right aggregation rule, but that's life in a vanilla utilitarian worldin a vanilla utilitarian world.)

It seems that rules for getting Greenguard certification don't assess relative levels of goodness, just whether it is better than the standard they set, which in this case is 1 / 10th the American workplace standard or the National Ambient Air Quality Standard set by the EPA.

It held that while the data subject's right to privacy and data protection override «as a general rule» the interest of internet users in having access to information, the balance in specific cases may depend on other factors (such as the nature of the data and whether the public had an interest in it)[81].

Key factors the study looked at in assigning grades were whether state law mandates the appointment of attorneys for children in dependency proceedings; whether these attorneys represent the children in a client - directed manner; whether the representation continues throughout the case, including appeal; whether states provide attorneys with specialized training; whether the child is given the legal status of a party to the proceedings; and whether rules pertaining to confidentiality and immunity from liability apply to attorneys representing these children.

Last week, U.S. Judge Royce Lamberth of the federal court in D.C. issued a ruling permitting the case to go forward, finding that there were valid questions as to whether Wachovia acted legally when it terminated the loan.

In that case, U.S. District Judge George Daniels ruled that Congress, not the courts, should decide whether Trump is violating the Constitution by failing to divest his business holdings.