Sentences with phrase «rule of science which»

Not exact matches

Sir Sayyid urged the Muslims to develop a new science of dialectics to counter the atheistic trends produced by Western civilization, and in 1292 (A.D. 1875) he wrote a commentary on the Qur» an in which he rejected the conception of Islam as a code of rules and regulations which, he said, can not stand the test of scientific scrutiny.

The protest is NOT against science and structure, rather, the protest is against the «dehumanization» of the human being by reducing him / her down to only matter and rules, and is against dismissing the «spirit & soul» which give every individual his / her unique «person.»

Many commonplaces of today are the improbabilities of yesterday, and in any branch of science «improbabilities» occur from time to time which are apparently arbitrary exceptions to previously observed rules.

Thereby they guide the direction of normal research, which is «an attempt to force nature into the preformed and relatively inflexible boxes that the paradigm supplies».18 Like solving a puzzle or playing a game of chess, normal science seeks solutions within an accepted framework; the rules of the game are already established.

Theologians influenced by positivism, whose adherents saw reality as strictly that which can be experienced through the senses and knowledge as that which can be obtained through a narrow definition of the scientific method, and linguistic analysis, which purported that the only proper function of philosophy is the study of the usage of words and sentences, also treated science and religion as separate realms, distinct «language games,» each with its own set of rules.

LeJeune would point out that science which remained within the constraints of the moral law proved, as a rule, to be more creative and more beneficial than science that did not.

The Bible, is fiction; because, overall, its authors meant it as presentation, not as science, or even as history, which is a form of science with its own scientific rules of evidence.

Just as an astrologer» «please explain to me how science proves anything» «Religion is based on what someone stated a long time ago and can not be changed» «book of rules, which once it is written down it can't be changed» «Religion is equivalent of magic» «met a few rational atheists, but not many.

Nevertheless, just as in science there are some overarching governing rules of the universe which tend to be active in all situations and events, so also in trying to understand some of the bad things that happen in life, there seem to be some overarching rules which guide and govern these actions.

The Obama - era regulation — the Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices rule — would have incorporated into the National Organic Program welfare standards that were not based on science and that were outside the scope of the Organic Food Production Act of 1990, according to the National Pork Producers Council, which maintains that the Organic Food Production Act limited consideration of livestock as organic to feeding and medication practices.

I like to think we could take the «best of both worlds», and learn from the French, who pioneered the science of child health (puériculture) in the 19th century — on which their wonderful kids» food rules, routines, and recipes are based.

By participating in the Contest, each entrant unconditionally accepts and agrees to comply with and abide by these Official Rules and the decisions of the American Association for the Advancement of Science («AAAS» or «Sponsor») which shall be final and binding in all respects.

Science gains from a long - standing «20/20» rule: To get a meteorite name and an official classification — which makes a stone more valuable — a dealer or collector must hand over to a scientific institution 20 grams or 20 % of the weight of the stone, whichever is less.

In addition to his scientific research, Hawking, a professor at the University of Cambridge, was known for his popular science books, including the best - selling A Brief History of Time, which captivated readers with lucid explanations of the universe's birth and the physical laws that rule the cosmos.

As for releasing a synthetic organism into the environment — for example, a souped - up algae for energy production, which one ecologist worried could cause havoc — at least for now, the risks are not much different from those of more conventional genetically modified products, which are covered by existing rules, said science policy expert Michael Rodemeyer of the University of Virginia.

In its statement, IWC points out its reviews and reports «have been widely debated and referenced by parties on all sides of the [scientific whaling] debate including the 2014 ruling of the International Court of Justice,» which found that Japan's whaling program was not about science.

Earlier this month, NASA unveiled a draft set of rules for its next Discovery competition, which funds planetary science missions costing no more than $ 450 million.

Lead author Dr Alex Serb, from Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton, said: «If we want to build artificial systems that can mimic the brain in function and power we need to use hundreds of billions, perhaps even trillions of artificial synapses, many of which must be able to implement learning rules of varying degrees of complexity.

Under these new principles another incident like the sacking of Professor David Nutt by the Home Secretary, which was criticised at the time by the Science Minister, will be entirely within the Government's new rules.

But you have to play by the rules, and if the rules state that «all aspects of science and technology, including those biographies... which contribute to an understanding of scientific thought or method, are covered», then one book published last year has to take pride of place, even if it is by a non-British professional science writer.

While there was a lot of interesting science in this paper (the new methodology, the range of results etc.) which fully justified its appearance in Nature, we were quite critical of their basic conclusion — that climate sensitivities significantly higher than the standard range (1.5 — 4.5 ºC) were plausible — because there is significant other data, predominantly from paleo - climate, that pretty much rule those high numbers out (as we discussed again recently).

A social class is a set of subjectively defined concepts in the social sciences and political theory centered on models of social stratification in which «These upper class toffs don't care about those on the breadline» - We asked the people hurting most if the new Universal Credit rules would ACTUALLY

It is the reason why science fiction is my cinematic genre of choice — there is something thrilling about breaking the rules and getting away with it, and here is a world in which the laws of... Continue reading Annihilation

It is the reason why science fiction is my cinematic genre of choice — there is something thrilling about breaking the rules and getting away with it, and here is a world in which the laws of nature really don't apply.

1984 is based on the classic science fiction novel by George Orwell, which offered a bleak vision of a future dystopia where one's thoughts and actions were controlled by a totalitarian government ruled by an entity known simply as «Big Brother».

Coming in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision to uphold race - conscious admissions policies at the University of Texas at Austin — a case in which Garces authored briefs on behalf of 444 social science researchers — the Schuette case will rule on changes to the admission system at public postsecondary institutions in the state of Michigan.

If the judge again rules in the parent union's favor at a hearing later this month, parents who signed the trigger petition will vote Oct. 18 on one of two local nonprofit charter operators that submitted bids to take over Desert Trails in the fall of 2013: the Lewis Center for Educational Research, which runs a popular charter school with a focus on science and project - based learning, and LaVerne Elementary Preparatory Academy, which partners with a university and has a focus on classic literature.

His fiction includes Sutherland's Rules, a crime caper / thriller with a shimmer of the fantastic; Black Easter, a supernatural suspense novel which pits love against black magic and demonic possession on a remote, idyllic Greek island; and Free Verse and Other Stories, a collection of Dario's short science fiction work (currently 99 cents on Amazon).

His fiction includes Sutherland's Rules, a crime caper / thriller with a shimmer of the fantastic; Black Easter, a supernatural suspense novel which pits love against black magic and demonic possession on a remote, idyllic Greek island; and Free Verse and Other Stories, a collection of Dario's short science fiction work.

As for the procedure of ordering science custom papers online, it is necessary also to follow some requirements and rule, which are helpful in order to implement the task online.

His pointillist style, which is guided by intuition rather than science, generates meaning with dabs of paint that cover the entire canvas according to an implied set of rules or codes.

While there was a lot of interesting science in this paper (the new methodology, the range of results etc.) which fully justified its appearance in Nature, we were quite critical of their basic conclusion — that climate sensitivities significantly higher than the standard range (1.5 — 4.5 ºC) were plausible — because there is significant other data, predominantly from paleo - climate, that pretty much rule those high numbers out (as we discussed again recently).

Even in mathematics, which is much more exact than the other sciences, since it builds on immutable axioms and the rules of logic, there are numerous conjectures that are believed to be true, but for which a stringent and in itself conclusive mathematical proof is missing.

The apparent acclaim from science is its acceptance of the EPA rules for MPGE, which denies the fact that electricity is fundamentally derived from heat engine operations, where massive heat energy is discharged of necessity, and the formula asserts no such heat discharge.

The role of science will be to discover new bad consequences that need to be considered, and to try to see which of the possible bad consequences can be ruled out in the light of new research.

What I said was «As authors, we had to report only the best available science (inclusive of a select few grey literatures as per the rules of procedure) which is «policy - relevant and yet policy - neutral» and that's what we collectively did while writing the Asia Chapter.

They bypassed this most basic rule in science, which underscores the paradox of rules.

The Methodological Level: disputes over the rules to settle factual disputes a) are in effect «rules of evidence» b) serve as a kind of «science court» in which a «verdict» on factual disputes is resolved by appeal to «evidence» c) this reflects the empiricist's commitment to the «Leibnizean ideal» d) explains how a «staggering proportion» of disputes are in fact resolved e) however, occasional disputes over the methodological rules arise 3.

However, as we shall see, there is another role of science about which the rules and norms shift as a matter of ethics.

The youth, between 9 and 14 years old, had petitioned the State agency to create a rule mandating reductions of greenhouse gas emissions based on the most current climate science, which says that 350 ppm of carbon dioxide is the maximum level for a safe climate system.

If courts value the universe of science, uphold the rule of law, and stay within the limits of their own authority, they should refuse to rule on climate science and refer scientific disputes back to the scientific community, which is where they belong.

That is, in Thomas Kuhn's sense of «normal science» as puzzle solving, in which there are «rules that limit both the nature of acceptable solutions and the steps by which they are to be obtained».

«It is the rule which says that the other rules of scientific procedure must be designed in such a way that they do not protect any statement in science against falsification.»

There is no Supreme Court of Science; some organization which rules who is right or wrong on an issue appretaining to sScience; some organization which rules who is right or wrong on an issue appretaining to sciencescience.

1) accused of plagarism, felony, anti-science, misleading Congress because of your climate science testimony, 2) have a rule made up, which only applied to you, that blocks you from mentoring graduate students, 3) have a friend tell you he was not happy with you because you were awarded a patent.

If you enter a profession or milieu which is governed by certain standards, whether it be medicine, law, science, the military, public service etc — part of the deal is that there have to be very exceptional circumstances for you to break the rules.

This is no problem at all, rule one of climate «science «states that «when models and reality differ in value, it is reality which always in error «Having spent all that time and effort in making the data give the «right results «how could it be otherwise.

Good decisions tend to emerge from processes in which people are explicit about their goals; consider a range of alternative options for pursuing their goals; use the best available science to understand the potential consequences of their actions; carefully consider the trade - offs; contemplate the decision from a wide range of views and vantages, including those who are not represented but may be affected; and follow agreed - upon rules and norms that enhance the legitimacy of the process for all those concerned.

In contrast, when the media, politicians and many many academics talk of «science» they mean a group of people, almost entirely academics and the rules of this club is that you can only get in if submit to other members of the club and get them to sanction your membership (which comes by getting papers and grants).

To date, much international discussion at the interface of science and politics has taken as a rule of thumb that — as a first step — global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide should not exceed approximately twice the concentrations which existed before the modern industrial era.