Sentences with phrase «rule on a certain issue»

In legal terms, a stipulation means there's no need for the court to rule on a certain issue, because the parties to the lawsuit already agree on it.

In legal terms, a stipulation means there's no need for the court to rule on a certain issue, because the parties to...

Not exact matches

Many large financial services firms were on track to comply by the rule's April 10 effective date, but facing pressure from certain segments of the financial industry, President Trump issued a presidential memorandum directing the Labor Department to consider revising or even rescinding the rule entirely.

And then comes: the taboo subjects; talking about people as if they are not there (or as if they are an «issue», not a person); assuming everyone (who counts) is of a certain race, ability, class, language, sexuality or gender; various non-biblical behavioural rules; the targeted enforcement of church rules (whether «biblical» or not) on particular groups; and the general reluctance to see things from another's perspective (even if this is a skill that churchgoers use all day, every day, outside thw church).

Nadine Dorries, a Tory backbencher who is starting to gain a reputation for adopting Christian positions on moral issues, introduced the ten minute rule bill, which would «require schools to provide certain additional sex education to girls aged between 13 and 16» and «to provide that such education must include information and advice on the benefits of abstinence from sexual activity».

Disapprove Alaska Predator Control Rule — Vote Passed (225 - 193, 12 Not Voting) The joint resolution would disapprove the rule issued by the Interior Department on Aug. 5, 2016, that prohibits certain predator control practices in national wildlife refuges in Alaska (such as the taking of mother bears and their cubs, the killing of wolves and their pups at den sites, and aerial shootiRule — Vote Passed (225 - 193, 12 Not Voting) The joint resolution would disapprove the rule issued by the Interior Department on Aug. 5, 2016, that prohibits certain predator control practices in national wildlife refuges in Alaska (such as the taking of mother bears and their cubs, the killing of wolves and their pups at den sites, and aerial shootirule issued by the Interior Department on Aug. 5, 2016, that prohibits certain predator control practices in national wildlife refuges in Alaska (such as the taking of mother bears and their cubs, the killing of wolves and their pups at den sites, and aerial shooting).

Dr Bachmann originally became involved in this area of research through his role as Rule of Law Subject Matter expert for the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation's (NATO) study on hybrid threats facing Europe — diverse issues such as terrorism, organized crime, failed states and how a mass influx of migrants might lead to political instability in certain countries.

FHWA and FTA reopened the docket for 30 days beginning on September 23 (with the comment period ending on October 24) to seek public comment on certain issues raised in the NPRM, including on the impact of the proposed requirements for unified planning products where multiple MPOs serve the same UZA, potential exceptions that should be included in the final rule, and criteria for applying such exceptions.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) issued a final rule adopting certain regulations required by the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) enacted on December 4, 2015.

The proposal comes on the heels of Pruitt's plans to prevent the agency from using certain scientific research in issuing new rules.

I suspect that the real heavy lifting in enhancing access to justice is a matter of procedural reform — specialized decision - making bodies with extremely simplified procedural rules for specific civil law issues (something that actually already exists in certain areas such as Landlord / Tenant, but could be further improved upon), wider permissions for over-the-counter motions, fewer unnecessary court appearances, fewer procedurally - mandated appearances (e.g., going from a Case Conference to a Settlement Conference to a Trial Management Conference, and possibly further, before you can get to a family law trial), and so on.

Indiana Trial Rule 403 goes on to state in part that even relevant evidence can be excluded if its probative value is outweighed by certain dangers of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues or misleading the jury.

Applying the Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27, the Court noted that «subject to certain well - known exceptions, the general rule is that when an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and the determination is essential to the judgment, the determination is conclusive in a subsequent action between the parties, whether on the same or a different claim.»

The Hryniak decision backed Ontario's new rules on summary judgment (judgment made on a claim, without full trial, when a judge finds an issue can be decided based on certain facts or clear, incontrovertible evidence), and provided guidance on when it can be used.

Moreover, there is no question that many other issues in contract law do engage substantive rules of law: the requirements for the formation of the contract, the capacity of the parties, the requirement that certain contracts be evidenced in writing, and so on.

Genuine issues of fact precluded summary judgment on a consumer's claims against a seafood producer for allegedly making unlawful, false, and misleading advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh, L.).

On May 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada denied a group of Nortel's bondholders leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal's previous ruling that Nortel's bondholders were not entitled to US$ 1.6 billion in post-filing interest on their unsecured claims against Nortel.4 Between 1996 and 2008, certain of Nortel's Canadian and U.S. entities issued and / or guaranteed a number of unsecured bonds (referred to in Nortel's CCAA proceedings as the «Crossover Bonds»On May 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada denied a group of Nortel's bondholders leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal's previous ruling that Nortel's bondholders were not entitled to US$ 1.6 billion in post-filing interest on their unsecured claims against Nortel.4 Between 1996 and 2008, certain of Nortel's Canadian and U.S. entities issued and / or guaranteed a number of unsecured bonds (referred to in Nortel's CCAA proceedings as the «Crossover Bonds»on their unsecured claims against Nortel.4 Between 1996 and 2008, certain of Nortel's Canadian and U.S. entities issued and / or guaranteed a number of unsecured bonds (referred to in Nortel's CCAA proceedings as the «Crossover Bonds»).

In the present case, it is common ground, that the amount of the public contract at issue in the main proceedings amounts to EUR 85,000, which is considerably below the thresholds for application laid down in Article 4 of Directive 2014/24... On the other hand, in its reference for a preliminary ruling, the referring court has not provided any information enabling the Court to... demonstrate the existence of a certain cross-border interest... In those circumstances, the Court finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis added).

Intriguingly, know that some of the most thoughtful persons working on sentencing issues are also golf nuts, and they are trying to improve the clarity of sentencing rules and trying to «reduce the penalties in certain circumstances to ensure that they are proportionate.»

The case revolves around the issue of interpretation of certain provisions of the underling agreement and the interplay between the English law rules on equitable set - off and Russian foreign currency exchange regulations.

The Eighth Circuit also had accepted a mandamus petition with respect to certain discovery rulings that State Farm had challenged, but found it unnecessary to reach the discovery issues given its ruling on the merits and class certification.

Ohio - At the request of the Ohio State Society of Medical Assistants (OSSMA), Mr. Balasa drafted comments on behalf of the OSSMA and the AAMA regarding proposed rules issued by the Ohio Board of Nursing for advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) delegation to medical assistants of certain types of medication administration.

A court's legal authority to hear a case, and issue enforceable orders and judgments within a particular geographic area and / or rule on certain types of legal cases.

On December 12, 2013, The Federal Reserve Board, along with five other federal regulatory agencies, issued a final rule to exempt a subset of higher priced mortgage loans (HPML) from certain appraisal requirements.