My understanding is the benching of #Patriots CB Malcolm Butler happened because of a perfect storm of issues: Sickness, a rough week of practice, and a minor
rule violation believed to be related to curfew.
Not exact matches
In addition to any other requirements or restrictions set forth in this Agreement, you shall not: (i) utilize the credit available on any Card to provide cash advances to Cardholders, (ii) submit any card transaction for processing that does not arise from your sale of goods or service to a buyer customer, (iii) act as a payment intermediary or aggregator or otherwise resell our services on behalf of any third party, (iv) send what you
believe to be potentially fraudulent authorizations or fraudulent card transaction, or (v) use your Merchant Account or the Service in a manner that Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover or any other Payment Network reasonably
believes to be an abuse of the Payment Network or a
violation of Payment Network
rules.
A «whistleblower» discloses information he or she reasonably
believes evidences: • A
violation of any law,
rule or regulation • An abuse of authority • Gross mismanagement • A gross waste of funds • A substantial and specific danger to public health or safety
«If you belong to an institution with known, and lawful,
rules, it implies no
violation of dignity, and it is not cause for reasonable offence, that those
rules should be applied to you - however wrong you may
believe them to be.
According to the study, «many teachers
believe a need to comply with federal guidelines and a fear of penalties and the potential loss of federal dollars pushed MPS administrators to reduce discipline numbers however possible; even going so far as to stop issuing suspensions or even detentions for clear
violations of school
rules.»
Animal Haven will not retaliate against employees who disclose or threaten to disclose to a supervisor or a public body, any activity, policy, or practice of Animal Haven that the employee reasonably
believes is in
violation of a law, or a
rule, or regulation mandated pursuant to law or is in
violation of a clear mandate of public policy concerning.
The quote from HHS in the Omnibus
Rule is «[W] e
believe that making subcontractors directly liable for
violations of the applicable provisions of the HIPAA
Rules will help to alleviate concern on the part of covered entities that protected health information is not adequately protected when provided to subcontractors.»
However, the «duty to report» outlined in
Rule 2.15 above is reinstated if, in good faith, the JLAP committee member or volunteer has: reason to
believe that an attorney or judge participating in the JLAP program is failing to cooperate with said program; is engaged in criminal behavior or the threat thereof; or, is otherwise in
violation of
Rule 2.15 which is beyond or succeeds the behavior upon which the judge's participation in JLAP was initially based.
If, after this initial review, the Bar counsel determines that there is probable cause to
believe that the lawyer has violated the ethical
rules, the Bar counsel will assess the seriousness of the
violation.
We do not
believe the privacy
rules will limit voluntary reporting of
violations of the CSA.
The covered entity will not be in
violation of this
rule, provided that the disclosing individual
believes in good faith that the covered entity has engaged in conduct which is unlawful or otherwise violates professional or clinical standards, or that the care, services or conditions provided by the covered entity potentially endanger one or more patients, workers or the public.
If you
believe that a covered entity or business associate violated your (or someone else's) health information privacy rights or committed another
violation of the Privacy, Security or Breach Notification
Rules, you may file a complaint with OCR.
The Committee advised that doing so could mislead a potential client in
violation of
Rules 7.1 and 7.4 to
believe that the lawyer was a «specialist» in that area.
A lawyer who
believes that another lawyer's mental condition materially impairs her ability to represent clients, and who knows that that lawyer continues to do so, must report that lawyer's consequent
violation of
Rule 1.16 (b)(2), which requires that she withdraw from the representation of clients.
Maintaining a professional association with any person who the applicant, licensee, registered intern, or certificateholder knows, or has reason to
believe, is in
violation of this chapter or of a
rule of the department or the board.
If TREB has reason to
believe that a Member's VOW has been the cause of, or permitted a breach in, the security of the MLS ® data or a
violation of this VOW Policy, or the MLS ®
Rules and Policies (including the VOW
Rules) related to use by one or more Consumers, the Member shall, upon request of TREB, provide to TREB a copy of the record of the name, email address, username, current password, and audit trail, if required, of any Consumer identified by TREB to be suspected of involvement in the breach or
violation.
TREB will require that Members (1) utilize appropriate security protection, such as firewalls, as long as such requirement does not impose security obligations greater than those employed concurrently by TREB; and (2) maintain an audit trail of Consumers» activity on the VOW and make that information available to TREB if TREB has reason to
believe that any VOW has been the cause of, or permitted a breach in, the security of the MLS ® data or a
violation of applicable MLS ®
Rules and Policies (including the VOW
Rules).
MLSs that allow persistent downloading of the MLS database by participants for display or distribution on the Internet or by other electronic means may require that participants» websites (1) utilize appropriate security protection, such as firewalls, provided that any security obligations imposed on participants may not be greater than those employed concurrently by the MLS, and / or (2) maintain an audit trail of consumer activity on participants» websites and make that information available to the MLS if the MLS has reason to
believe that a participant's IDX website has caused or permitted a breach in the security of the data or a
violation of MLS
rules related to use by consumers.