Sentences with phrase «ruled against the buyers»

The appellate court ruled against the buyers» contention that the rep had failed to meet the obligations for fiduciary duty listed in the agency disclosure form they had signed.

Not exact matches

A ruling against AT&T would seemingly eliminate Verizon or Comcast as buyers.

I would advise clients to always obtain their own inspection report as I believe there was an Ontario court ruling some years ago that a buyer can not rely on an inspection report prepared for a seller and therefore there is no recourse against the inspector and no fiduciary duty required from the sellers inspector.

The buyers may lose their deposit, which hurts, but not as much as a court ruling against them.

Insight A court recent ruled that a tolling agreement, when entered into between companies that intended to merge, violated the Hart - Scott - Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, leading to the imposition of significant financial penalties against the buyer, according to Hogan Lovells.

If the government actually wants to protect the public against Facebook abusing its power, it would need to go harder than the Honest Ads Act that would put political advertising on Internet platforms under the same scrutiny regarding disclosure of buyers as the rules for TV and radio advertising.

The court ruled that the Broker's confidentiality policy was contrary to the purpose of the property disclosure law and that the Buyer had sufficiently alleged a cause of action against the Broker for its failure to disclose the information from the earlier transaction.

The Georgia appellate court ruled that a fraudulent inspection report could serve as the basis for a lawsuit by the buyers against their agent, the seller, and inspector.

I would advise clients to always obtain their own inspection report as I believe there was an Ontario court ruling some years ago that a buyer can not rely on an inspection report prepared for a seller and therefore there is no recourse against the inspector and no fiduciary duty required from the sellers inspector.

After the court dismissed the claims against the appraiser and the broker, the buyer appealed those rulings.

South Dakota court rules that buyer's claims against representative over information about utilities was not barred by the statute of limitations.

Thus, no misrepresentations were made by the Salesperson and so the court ruled in favor of the Salesperson and Brokerage (and also dismissed the cross-claim made against the Buyer's Representative, as those claims no longer had any basis).

Therefore, the court ruled that the only commission claim that the Buyer's Representative could bring would be a claim against the listing broker, not the Seller, and so dismissed the lawsuit against the Seller.

Following the favorable ruling, the Brokerage filed a lawsuit seeking indemnification from the Sellers for the costs incurred in defending itself against the buyer's lawsuit.

If there is a subsequent sale of the property and the licensee, who is the principal shareholder of ABC Mortgage Corporation which holds the mortgage registered against the property, is not providing trading services to the seller and buyer of the property and has no knowledge of the sale, that licensee would not be required to make disclosure in accordance with section 5 - 9 of the Rules.

The same licensee would also be required to disclose the potential conflict of interest as required by section 3 - 3 (1)(j) of the Rules if the licensee was representing the buyer or seller or both and was at the same time holding a mortgage against the property either personally or through a corporation.

The federal government and state of Colorado have numerous rules and laws to protect tenants and home buyers from being discriminated against.

The Buyer brought a lawsuit against the Sellers, and the trial court ruled that the Sellers were guilty of negligent misrepresentation and also ruled that the Buyer had suffered $ 25,000 in damages.

Buyer appealed the trial court's ruling, and the appellate court reversed and assessed the costs of the appeal against the Managing Broker.