Sentences with phrase «ruled in a case involving»

The state of the law regarding the use of race in student assignment has been somewhat up in the air since the Supreme Court's confusing 2007 ruling in a case involving the Seattle school system and a DOE «guidance» issued the following year.

The appeal court was ruling in a case involving former Ontario Provincial Police officer Danno Cusson, who sued the Ottawa Citizen and three of its reporters after the newspaper published a series of stories about his trip to New York in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

(In Gubernat the Supreme Court in 1995 ruled in a case involving children of parents who never married, that the court in ruling on a name change motion should consider: «[T] he length of time that the child has used one surname, the identification of the child as a member or part of a family unit, the potential anxiety, embarrassment, or discomfort the child might experience if the child bears a surname different from the custodial parent, and any preferences the child might express, assuming the child possesses sufficient maturity to express a relevant preference.»)

Not exact matches

In fact, in 2014 when the last major cases involving such infringements were decided, the court ruled unanimously against patent trollIn fact, in 2014 when the last major cases involving such infringements were decided, the court ruled unanimously against patent trollin 2014 when the last major cases involving such infringements were decided, the court ruled unanimously against patent trolls.

However, Lawlor says the Florida Supreme Court in 2003 ruled that the shooting of a separate victim constituted a separate incident when reviewing the case of a fatal shooting at a fraternity graduation party involving multiple victims.

Removal (outside of those specific cases) typically involves hiring a lawyer, going to court, getting a judge to rule in your favor and getting the site's owner to comply with a court order.

Neville there were times when dominionism worked for Israel which were the exceptions rather than the rule but generally it did nt sadly because of the wickedness of peoples hearts.Power tends to corrupt people ie in the case of nebbucanezzar especially when they succeed.Like you i think Gods people have more impact by just letting Christ work through them could be me but i find politics tends to involve power money and compromise.Regardless of what political state we find ourselves Gods sovereign and his will be done on earth as it is in heaven.My focus is real simple just follow Jesus with all my heart mind soul and strength and love others as myself and that is just following Jesus daily and trusting him in everything.regards brentnz

In June, the Supreme Court managed to rule on two separate cases involving same - sex marriage without ruling on the merits of a constitutional right to same - sex marriage.

The Washington State Supreme Court just overturned a discriminative ruling in a child custody case that involved a lesbian mother unable to come out to her own children after divorcing their father.

In 2015, additional guidelines were added, which further protected all intended parents and made the rule that most surrogacy cases that directly involved California in some way would have to be tried within the statIn 2015, additional guidelines were added, which further protected all intended parents and made the rule that most surrogacy cases that directly involved California in some way would have to be tried within the statin some way would have to be tried within the state.

The ruling involved women and girls who were denied abortions in Northern Ireland either in cases of fatal foetal abnormality or despite their pregnancies being the result of sexual crimes.

The Supreme Court, in a case last year involving former Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell, ruled that corruption convictions could only be based on performance of an «official act» that represented a formal exercise of government power — not just a phone call or a meeting with a lobbyist.

The Court of Appeals eventually ruled in Soares» favor but even then - Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman noted the case involved a «personal issue back and forth» between Carter and Soares.

Gorsuch declined to say whether Roe vs. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion, was correctly decided more than four decades ago, but did say that if Trump had asked him to rule in a certain way involving Roe, «I would've walked out the door.

The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that a former National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party, Chief Olisa Metuh, had a case to answer in respect of the money laundering charges involving the sums of N400m and $ 2m instituted against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

But the judge overseeing the case, ruling on a host of pretrial motions, found this distinction somewhat immaterial, since Percoco, according to the government, «continued to function in a senior advisory and supervisory role with regard to the Governor's Office, and continued to be involved in the hiring of staff and the coordination of the Governor's official events and priorities.»

Despite the allegation involving funding for the DA's race — and another accusing Sampson of filing false Senate disclosure forms to conceal a $ 188,500 loan from a real estate developer — Carter insisted his case wasn't in the same category as a recent rash of other criminal cases accusing New York lawmakers of abusing their authority for personal gain or to cheat on campaign finance rules.

But the two otherwise separate cases are linked by a Supreme Court ruling in criminal cases, involving potential prosecution witnesses, the sources said.

According to the report in the Telegraph newspaper Mr Lyon wrote to Mr Hands saying: «Given his understandable wish to inform his constituents about the handling of constituency cases during the election period, and that he did not intend to breach the rules of the House in sending out his letter, and given the scale and costs involved, I consider that the matter can be resolved on the basis of Mr Khan's response.

Graduate assistants at private universities may form unions, the National Labor Relations Board ruled today in a case involving Columbia University.

«Even persons who were facing criminal prosecution prior to the 2015 presidential elections who are now members of the ruling APC and other members of APC who are overtly known to be involved in known cases of corruption were excluded from the list whilst persons who have never been charged with any crime and who in fact have not held any previous government portfolio including myself were listed as «looters».

The civil rights activist has served as a spokesman for the family of Garner — a 43 - year - old Staten Island man whose chokehold death was ruled a homicide by the medical examiner following a July 18 attempt to arrest him for allegedly selling loose cigarettes — and is also heavily involved in the case of Michael Brown, who was shot and killed by police in Ferguson, Mo..

Fayose noted that two of the judges involved, Justice Adeniyi Ademola and Justice Nnamdi Dimgba, recently ruled against the DSS and condemned its impunity in the cases of former National Security Adviser, Col Sambo Dasuki (retd.)

In a separate case involving undergraduate admissions at the University of Michigan, the court ruled that the college's mechanical point system, which granted a prespecified number of points on the basis of race, was not legitimate (14).

The Supreme Court is also likely to consider one of several cases involving conceal carry rights in the future because of conflicting rulings from intermediate courts of appeal, Donohue said.

The rules can be stricter at public universities or hospitals — especially, in the latter case, if clinical trials are involved.

The court was ruling on a case, In re Kubin, involving a patented gene sequence for the human immune protein NAIL, owned by Amgen Inc. in Thousand Oaks, CaliforniIn re Kubin, involving a patented gene sequence for the human immune protein NAIL, owned by Amgen Inc. in Thousand Oaks, Californiin Thousand Oaks, California.

Biotech companies got a break today when a U.S. appeals court handed down a long - awaited ruling on gene patents in a case prompted by a suit involving Myriad Genetics of Salt Lake City.

The ruling involved a case brought by Greenpeace in 2004 against a German patent granted to neuroscientist Oliver Brüstle in 1999.

Eli Lilly takes a win over generic challenger Actavis as London court rules in its favor in a patent case involving lung cancer drug Alimta.

As a general rule however, intermittent fasting involves cutting calories in whole or in part, either a couple of days a week, every other day, or even daily, as in the case of the scheduled eating regimen I use myself.

In ruling on any discovery dispute or extension request, the arbitrator shall take into consideration the nature, amount, and scope of the underlying arbitration claim, the cost and other effort what would be involved in providing the requested discovery, the case schedule, and whether the requested discovery is necessary for the adequate preparation of a claim or defensIn ruling on any discovery dispute or extension request, the arbitrator shall take into consideration the nature, amount, and scope of the underlying arbitration claim, the cost and other effort what would be involved in providing the requested discovery, the case schedule, and whether the requested discovery is necessary for the adequate preparation of a claim or defensin providing the requested discovery, the case schedule, and whether the requested discovery is necessary for the adequate preparation of a claim or defense.

Adding to this is her great uncle Lord Mansfield's position as the most powerful judge in the land, who is set to rule on a case involving a slave ship that could affect England's slave trade as a whole.

In its decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983In its decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983.)

In ruling on the due - process question, the appeals court overturned a district court's decision to dismiss the case, which involved a San Antonio science teacher's claim that he was «constructively discharged «3from his position without a hearing prior to his dismissal.

Also, the justices ruled in favor of a student debtor in a case involving student loans and bankruptcy that was being watched closely by many in banking and higher education.

The Supreme Court's recent decision in Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, which authorizes educators to supervise the content of official high - school newspapers, is the Court's most significant ruling in a free - speech case involving public - school students since it decided Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District almost 20 years ago.

Their ultimate ruling in the joined cases Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (05 - 908) and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education (05 - 915) will have far - reaching implications for integrated schooling in the United States.

School choice advocates were already celebrating Monday's 7 - 2 ruling in a closely watched case involving Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Mo..

A court case in 2016 involving Zenna Atkins, former Ofsted chair, revealed how academy trusts could circumvent rules to make a profit.

Should the unions lose, the immediate impact in terms of union income is relatively small — however the precedent set by a ruling in favor of the teachers has broad implications for future cases involving efforts to give every child the chance at an excellent education.

In 2007, the Parents Involved vs. Seattle School District Supreme Court case ruled that schools could no longer control enrollment by race.

The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial of cases before a court or an administrative body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview of a Federal Government agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions of governing statutes or other requirements of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required by the agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted by Congress, opinions or discussions of a court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption by agency officials.

The rule of thumb here is to have a savings account that is at least 3 months» worth of your current expenses, in case you get laid off or let go from your job, or you are involved in a car accident or have another reason you can not work.

However, the reason they're looking at the DNA testing is in order to rule more dogs as «non-pit bulls» and thus adoptable vs being instantly killed (the county recently lost a a Breed ID case involving three Cane Corsos).

Mansour v. King deals with due process in dangerous dog cases and is very clear about the standards and rules for the case, appeals and keeping of records involved.

In particular, she cited the case of Cortana in the Halo games, and how the developers have played with her character to keep her involved in the storyline without explicitly going against the in - universe rule of AIs having a seven - year lifespaIn particular, she cited the case of Cortana in the Halo games, and how the developers have played with her character to keep her involved in the storyline without explicitly going against the in - universe rule of AIs having a seven - year lifespain the Halo games, and how the developers have played with her character to keep her involved in the storyline without explicitly going against the in - universe rule of AIs having a seven - year lifespain the storyline without explicitly going against the in - universe rule of AIs having a seven - year lifespain - universe rule of AIs having a seven - year lifespan.

In a case involving the 5 Pointz building in Long Island City, New York, the artists invoked VARA but lost because the judge ruled that, although the artists had permission to decorate the space with murals, they «knew that the buildings were coming down» and therefore could not have expected that the work would be permanenIn a case involving the 5 Pointz building in Long Island City, New York, the artists invoked VARA but lost because the judge ruled that, although the artists had permission to decorate the space with murals, they «knew that the buildings were coming down» and therefore could not have expected that the work would be permanenin Long Island City, New York, the artists invoked VARA but lost because the judge ruled that, although the artists had permission to decorate the space with murals, they «knew that the buildings were coming down» and therefore could not have expected that the work would be permanent.

by Chris White Daily Caller A New York court ordered AG Eric Schneiderman Thursday to fork over public information about elements of his climate crusade to a libertarian think tank in Washington, D.C. New York Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) in a case involving a series of documents conservatives believe could reveal a -LSB-...]

The U.S. Supreme Court in 2016 ruled on two cases similar to the Illinois suit, involving state - federal jurisdiction regarding power markets.