Sentences with phrase «ruled in a case with»

It has come to my attention that Master Schlosser recently heard and made a ruling in another case with similar facts, and announced his intention to issue written reasons.

Internet users can lawfully browse articles online without the authorisation of the copyright holder, the Supreme Court has unanimously ruled in a case with huge implications for internet use.

Not exact matches

That said, there are exceptions to any rule and — in the case of presenting your business to the big guys — because they bring their old attitudes and ways of doing business to the bargaining table with them — it can be a big deal to look a lot bigger and broader than your business really is.

Included in the press release are parts of six e-mails obtained from the CBSA (download these documents), along with a CBSA Ruling and three trade compliance verifications, that lay out the group's case that the CBSA retroactively imposed an end use certificate requirement on these goods.

But with every rule, there's an exception: In this case, it's Justin Marks, Nascar driver and one of the purest entrepreneur / drivers in the sporIn this case, it's Justin Marks, Nascar driver and one of the purest entrepreneur / drivers in the sporin the sport.

Other occupations are using A.I. in tandem with people: Lawyers use software that can analyze cases and search for relevant past rulings; pharmaceutical firms use algorithms to aid in drug discovery.

In December, the Yukon appeal court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims, in this case to an area known as the KaskIn December, the Yukon appeal court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims, in this case to an area known as the Kaskin this case to an area known as the Kaska.

Now, with Montgomery v. Louisiana, the court must decide whether that rule can be applied retroactively: Henry Montgomery, the plaintiff in that case, shot and killed a Louisiana sheriff when he was 17 years old — way back in 1963.

Disney shareholders lost their case but the final ruling set a new bar for directors when approving these kinds of exit packages: «If a director acts with conscious disregard — in other words, a looking away — rather than a deliberate intent to violate his duties, he can still be held liable for acting in bad faith,» plaintiffs» attorney Steven G. Schullman told the New York Times back in 2006.

«This case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that heard it, which ruled in Yelp's favor and also found the claims not to be supported by credible evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.

The question is: Would you see more cards with higher interest rates or annual fees if issuers suddenly find the bottom line lacking due to an unfavorable settlement or ruling in this case?

Although he has ruled in several cases in favor of police accused of conducting illegal searches, he is best known for his opinions siding with defendants.

A ruling against Aereo would conflict with its earlier decision in the Cablevision case, the majority said.

The Liberals are unlikely to make any final decision on drug testing until the Supreme Court of Canada rules on its legality in a case between Suncor and workers at its Alberta oil sands operation, said Troy Winters, senior health and safety officer with the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

Yet, the current rules require that much of the cost be written off as an expense when it is incurred, meaning that early years in a product development tend to show very low profits, or in some cases even massive losses, with inflated profits toward the end.

With a number of organizations already in court making their case why this rule is unworkable, it's clear that jobs are on the line, and more importantly, families will lose access to sound professional financial advice.»

Tax Foresight uses the power of machine learning and artificial intelligence to analyze volumes of cases with an efficiency no human can match, allowing you to predict in advance how the court would rule on your client's scenario.

In that case, contingencies explain that «the Final Settlement Value will be determined in accordance with the By - Laws and Rules of The Options Clearing Corporation («OCC»).&raquIn that case, contingencies explain that «the Final Settlement Value will be determined in accordance with the By - Laws and Rules of The Options Clearing Corporation («OCC»).&raquin accordance with the By - Laws and Rules of The Options Clearing Corporation («OCC»).»

Removal (outside of those specific cases) typically involves hiring a lawyer, going to court, getting a judge to rule in your favor and getting the site's owner to comply with a court order.

The EU has invested five million euros to set up a centre that provides knowledge (in - depth sector market reports, guidelines, and case studies); tailored export advice extending to legal and regulatory requirements; rules on market access and competitor and market analysis; assistance with due diligence; training programs adapted for the needs of individual companies; and hot - desks and work spaces in China.

The agency has ruled importers who use the computer exemption must get certificates from the end users — consumers, in most cases — that certify the product will be used with a computer.

A state judge in Massachusetts ruled Wednesday that the Massachusetts Attorney General can move forward with a potentially gigantic data breach case against the credit reporting firm Equifax.

Included in the press release are parts of six emails obtained from the CBSA (download these documents), along with a CBSA Ruling and three trade compliance verifications, that lay out the group's case that the CBSA retroactively imposed an end - use certificate requirement on these goods.

It is a condition to the distribution that HP Co. receive (i) a private letter ruling from the IRS and / or one or more opinions from its external tax advisors, in each case, satisfactory to HP Co.'s board of directors, regarding certain U.S. federal income tax matters relating to the separation and related transactions, and (ii) an opinion of each of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, satisfactory to HP Co.'s board of directors, regarding the qualification of the distribution, together with certain related transactions,

It is a condition to the distribution that HP Co. receive (i) a private letter ruling from the IRS and / or one or more opinions from its external tax advisors, in each case, satisfactory to HP Co.'s board of directors, regarding certain U.S. federal income tax matters relating to the separation and related transactions, and (ii) an opinion of each of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, satisfactory to HP Co.'s board of directors, regarding the qualification of the distribution, together with certain related transactions, as a transaction that is generally tax - free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under Sections 355 and 368 (a)(1)(D) of the Code.

It's the first case of a major company using new IPO rules in Hong Kong that allow companies with different share classes to list there.

If events take a turn for the worse, as in the case of Valeant, executives can ride off with little fear of losing the large compensation they received during their tenure as clawback rules are rarely enforced.

All this is fixable, the companies say, with commitments to offload subscribers, hold prices steady or, in Comcast's case, make the combined entity comply with internet neutrality, content - sharing rules and other conditions to Comcast's 2009 acquisition of NBCU.

Jackson's order is consistent with the local rules in federal court in Washington in widely publicized cases, she noted.

Politicians always follow the «look busy» rule: when bad things happen, they have to be seen to be responding, even if there is little likelihood their actions will have any effect. But in this case, Harper was motivated by an additional strategic judgment. Perversely, with his re-election campaign sidetracked by ongoing revelations in the Duffy / Wright case, the Prime Minister actually wants Canadians to worry about the economy. Conservative strategists hope that will undermine voters» willingness to consider an alternative government, playing into the traditional frame that Conservatives have the strongest economic «credentials.»

With mounting uncertainty over the future of the North American free - trade agreement and more states eyeing possible Buy American rules, Ontario is keeping the policy ready in case it is needed, a senior government official told The Globe and Mail.

Milos Barutciski, a lawyer with Bennett Jones LLP in Toronto familiar with the SNC - Lavalin affair and who has co-operated with authorities on certain aspects of the case, said he believes the Trudeau government will study both allowing deferred prosecution agreements and changing the mandatory blacklist provisions in the Conservatives» controversial government procurement rules.

A federal judge has ruled in favor of an anonymous customer of the bitcoin exchange Coinbase against the Internal Revenue Service, permitting the unnamed bitcoiner to challenge the agency's summons and proceed with their case anonymously.

Rational investment decisions made based on existing capital rules are, in some cases, now inconsistent with the proposed rules.

The only reason I'm agnostic and not atheist is because I consider it arrogant for a person with limited information to rule something out totally (in this case a supreme god of the universe.)

Thus, in a lawsuit where a constitutional rule conflicts with a statute or executive policy the court hearing the case must follow the Constitution and ignore the conflicting act.

I doubt if many outside of Christianity would disagree with the court ruling in the case.

That wasn't even Olson's case, but with assists from a federal district court judge who came out as being in a same - sex relationship only after ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state law, Olson and Boies did succeed in disenfranchising millions of Californians on a procedural technicality.

Neville there were times when dominionism worked for Israel which were the exceptions rather than the rule but generally it did nt sadly because of the wickedness of peoples hearts.Power tends to corrupt people ie in the case of nebbucanezzar especially when they succeed.Like you i think Gods people have more impact by just letting Christ work through them could be me but i find politics tends to involve power money and compromise.Regardless of what political state we find ourselves Gods sovereign and his will be done on earth as it is in heaven.My focus is real simple just follow Jesus with all my heart mind soul and strength and love others as myself and that is just following Jesus daily and trusting him in everything.regards brentnz

The Home Office told Premier it did not «routinely comment on individual cases» but «each application is considered on its individual merits based on the evidence provided and in line with the UK's Immigration Rules.»

And is the case with children it is only in hindsight, and after experiencing the repercussions of our actions that any appreciation for the why of our parents rules seem in hindsight obvious and intended to spare us from learning lessons the hard way.

Schweitzer was firmly convinced that one of the shortcomings of all world religions is that they regard ethics as ultimately separated from spirituality, as is the general rule in Eastern religions, or as myopically identified with the total meaning of religion, as is the case generally in the West.

For all such cases complicated rules are necessary in order to avoid the dangers connected with them.

Now in mathematics insight into the relationship among ideas may indeed be «self - authenticating», at least within the framework of accepted axioms and rules; but in science this is not the case because one is not dealing with relationships among ideas alone.

Also, in case anyone is interested, I recently found this web page which shows various SC rulings dealing with religion and education — often regarding the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment:

A 2015 case in Washington ruled against pharmacists who refused to carry the drugs; however, state law allows that «an individual pharmacist with religious objections may refuse to fill the prescription if another pharmacist working for the pharmacy does so.»

Does the Supreme Court's ruling striking down state prohibitions of abortion in the 1973 cases of Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton belong on the plus side of the Court's ledger with Brown v. Board or on the minus side with Dred Scott?

With the recent Supreme Court ruling in the case of Allegheny County v. ACLU, I believe a new and exciting chapter in the church - state debate may be evolving around Jewish attempts in Pittsburgh and other places to legitimate the display of Jewish religious symbols in the public square.

The rule for organic was 100 % purity — at least at the farm gate — and there are cases in which a coop lost its organic certification and the director lost all credibility with the coffee industry.

A notable exception to this rule is Jamaican jerk pork, which can be treated with either a jerk rub, a jerk paste, or in some cases (mostly outside Jamaica), a jerk sauce.