Sentences with phrase «ruled in favor of the plaintiff»

If the class - action lawsuit against Honda, Nissan, Toyota and Ford rules in favor of the plaintiffs he notion of making money at all costs will also prove to be catastrophic at these companies.

When the International Trade Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs Suniva and SolarWorld in their case against cheap Chinese solar module and cell imports, reactions were polarized: the U.S. solar industry was outraged — as it had been for most of the duration of the court investigation — and investors, apparently, were extremely upbeat for the future of this same outraged industry, sending solar stocks sky - high.

Following months of legal wrangling, the commissioner said the county BOE would agree to grant access to those records if the judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff.

Although based on Lamberth's previous rulings in the case, he seems likely to rule in favor of the plaintiffs and issue a permanent injunction, Robertson predicts that stay or a new version of it would remain in place while the decision is appealed.

Oregon's system of paying for education has undergone challenges in court four times, but the state courts have never ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.

In June, a judge ruling in favor of the plaintiffs said that student performance must be used as part of a teacher's evaluation.

A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in 2014, finding that five long - standing teacher job protections, including a two - year probationary period for new teachers and a layoff system based on how many years one's been teaching, violated students» constitutional right to an equal education.

The courts must act and rule in favor of the plaintiffs — it must declare what is happening is legally wrong and join the demand for a just remedy so every child in PA has an opportunity to learn.

Judge Treu ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on every issue, removing five statutes concerning tenure, seniority and teacher dismissal rules from the state's constitution, adding, «The evidence is compelling.

Just last month, citing a part of the education code that says that a district may deviate from seniority (f) or purposes of maintaining or achieving compliance with constitutional requirements related to equal protection of the laws, Superior Judge William Highberger ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.

After an in - depth trial that lasted several, Administrative Law Judge Robert E. Meale ruled in favor of Plaintiff Surfrider Foundation and denied the town of Palm Beach a Joint Coastal Permit for the REACH 8 beach fill project because of the potential to harm environmental and recreational resources.

Plaintiffs and defendant all filed motions for summary judgment, and on Feb. 2, U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan issued a memorandum ruling in favor of plaintiffs and an order permanently barring Public.Resource.Org from posting any of the plaintiffs» standards.

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on the basis that the driver was in a position to monitor their blood sugar but failed to observe the necessary precautions to avoid a hypoglycemic attack.

The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and the City appeals.

The jury ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and found the drug company had «failed to warn the stay - at - home mother of the risks associated with Topamax and potential birth defects.»

On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court ruled in favor of the plaintiff.

The Master ruled in favor of the Plaintiff, determining that the Plaintiff had complied with Section 24 (5) of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act and, as such, there was no genuine issue to be decided at trial in this regard.

Atlantic City, N.J., jurors ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Linda Gross, and ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $ 11.11 million for failing to warn and making fraudulent misrepresentations about its transvaginal mesh product, Bloomberg reported.

A Dutch court classifies Bitcoin as a «transferable value», after it ruled in favor of a plaintiff who was owed 0.591 Bitcoins (BTC).

Not exact matches

A ruling in favor of the Friedrichs plaintiffs — or plaintiffs in future cases like it — would mean less money to support members in all states, even those that are not directly affected by the ruling.

Their false claims highlight the importance of remembering the facts in this case — the same facts that laid the ground for the landmark 2014 ruling in favor of the student plaintiffs and helped deliver a win for all of California's six million public school students.

In February of 2012 a district court judge ruled in favor of MEIC and other plaintiffs and determined that MDT failed to consider impacts of constructing new highway turnouts along the routIn February of 2012 a district court judge ruled in favor of MEIC and other plaintiffs and determined that MDT failed to consider impacts of constructing new highway turnouts along the routin favor of MEIC and other plaintiffs and determined that MDT failed to consider impacts of constructing new highway turnouts along the route.

Notwithstanding the liberal «relation back» principles of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and despite the plaintiffs» claim of «fraudulent concealment,» the Appellate Practice Group secured an award of summary judgment in favor of all additional defendants based on the statute of limitations defense.

In Salvas v. Wal - Mart Stores, the SJC ruled that a trial court judge erred when he decertified the class action, excluded testimony from the plaintiffs» expert witness, and granted partial summary judgment in favor of Wal - MarIn Salvas v. Wal - Mart Stores, the SJC ruled that a trial court judge erred when he decertified the class action, excluded testimony from the plaintiffs» expert witness, and granted partial summary judgment in favor of Wal - Marin favor of Wal - Mart.

The Alabama Supreme Court upheld the trial court's ruling in favor of Rockwell on the basis that the Plaintiff's product liability claims could not go forward because the Plaintiff failed to establish through competent evidence that any Rockwell product was defective.

Recently, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a premises liability plaintiff who alleged she was seriously injured when she tripped and fell on a missed step at an aviation company during an open house with her young grandson.

The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants early in the case proceedings, finding that the plaintiff could not sue the government for its alleged negligence, based on sovereign immunity grounds.

State Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Medical Malpractice Plaintiff's Attempt to Extend Statute of Limitations, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog, published July 15, 2016.

Rules are tagged with the court and jurisdiction, stage of case for disposition, date, and indication of whether the rule was applied in favor of the plaintiff or defendant.

: Prosecuted continuation applications, conducted discovery and authored successful claim construction ruling wholly in favor of plaintiff.

In the first comprehensive appellate decision interpreting Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1042.3 - 1042.6, Pennsylvania's tort reform measure intended to increase the threshold of merit for professional liability actions, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded for the entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of John's client, a physician, based upon the plaintiff's failure to file a certificate of merit in support of his medical malpractice claiIn the first comprehensive appellate decision interpreting Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1042.3 - 1042.6, Pennsylvania's tort reform measure intended to increase the threshold of merit for professional liability actions, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded for the entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of John's client, a physician, based upon the plaintiff's failure to file a certificate of merit in support of his medical malpractice claiin favor of John's client, a physician, based upon the plaintiff's failure to file a certificate of merit in support of his medical malpractice claiin support of his medical malpractice claim.

While the Court began its opinion by ruling in favor of Leonard on the plaintiff's manufacturing defect claim citing a lack of evidence that the valve was not installed as an anti-scald device, Leonard's fortunes quickly deteriorated.

The appellate court affirmed the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, finding that sufficient evidence was presented to allow the lower court to rule in her favor.

Several days after the court's ruling, a federal jury ruled in favor of a different plaintiff on a failure to warn claim.

A canny plaintiff will exploit differences between courts in her favor — differences in how they enforce certain rules, for example, or in their track records with a type of case.

In an unexpected ruling involving a dispute over 0.591 BTC, a Dutch Court motioned in favor of a plaintiff being rightfully entitled to his bitcoin mining proceeds from an unlisted mining company, Koinz Trading BIn an unexpected ruling involving a dispute over 0.591 BTC, a Dutch Court motioned in favor of a plaintiff being rightfully entitled to his bitcoin mining proceeds from an unlisted mining company, Koinz Trading Bin favor of a plaintiff being rightfully entitled to his bitcoin mining proceeds from an unlisted mining company, Koinz Trading BV.

«Lower courts have continued to allow plaintiffs access to federal courts with a simple allegation of a bare procedural violation or technical inaccuracy, resulting in forum - shopping by plaintiffs for the court most likely to rule in their favor,» said Melissa Sorenson, executive director of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS).

The court ruled in favor of the brokers against the plaintiffs.