Profits
ruled over the public interest.
Not exact matches
The New York
Public Interest Research Group examined the board's
rulings over the past five years and found that «they never take action on anything.»
Every land - owner, the judge
ruled, had property rights
over clouds and the water they contained passing
over their land; and, while men should not play God, if the government decided that cloud seeding was in the
public's
interest, it should proceed.
The leading case handed down
over twenty years ago was Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19 (1990), where the Supreme Court of Canada set out a three - pronged test: when a
public body's decision is administrative and final in nature, is made under a statute or code, and affects the
interests or rights of the accused person, then the
rules of procedural fairness must be followed.
Ensure you are up to date with the relevant procedural
rules If you are
interested in attending any Expert Witness Law and Procedure Courses to ensure that you are up to date with the current procedural
rules that affect you and your duties as an expert we have the following
public courses scheduled
over the coming months:
I do not believe that anyone would seriously argue that when drafting Model
Rules, it would be appropriate for the ABA to wear its «trade group» hat and promote the
interests of its member lawyers
over the
interests of clients, the courts, or the
public.
We're well
over a year away from the earliest point at which the ITC would make a final initial determination and, if that preliminary
ruling suggested an import ban, would request the most important round of
public interest submissions (the complaint also triggered a request for input, but the most important submissions would likely be made at a later stage).
At this point, the members of the Federation will discuss the issue at a meeting next month, and then the initiative passes to the law societies in the provinces and territories, who will be mulling
over what
rule would be best in the
interests of the
public, clients and the profession.
In a legal battle
over Internet music storage that could impact innovation and free expression on the Internet EFF
Public Knowledge and other public interest groups asked a federal judge in an amicus brief to protect the «safe harbor» rules for online content in EMI v. MP3
Public Knowledge and other
public interest groups asked a federal judge in an amicus brief to protect the «safe harbor» rules for online content in EMI v. MP3
public interest groups asked a federal judge in an amicus brief to protect the «safe harbor»
rules for online content in EMI v. MP3Tunes.