Google hasn't helped that by not showing off a store and by making weird
rules against advertising without explaining what will be allowed.
Not exact matches
The Competition Bureau says lack of disclosure by bloggers and influencers could fall under its
rules against misrepresentation and false
advertising.
But there is no excuse for violating the marketing requirements — and given the
Advertising Standards Authority has ruled against claims made in the advertising for Danone's formula brands, it clearly is not a reliable and objective source of i
Advertising Standards Authority has
ruled against claims made in the
advertising for Danone's formula brands, it clearly is not a reliable and objective source of i
advertising for Danone's formula brands, it clearly is not a reliable and objective source of information.
Pfizer / Wyeth has another
ruling against it today from the
Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) following a complaint brought by Baby Milk Action, this time
against an email campaign for its SMA brand of formula.
On 19 September 2012 the ASA
ruled against Pfizer / Wyeth's
advertising campaign headlined «What's the best milk after Kate's?»
In 2012, the ASA upheld Baby Milk Action's complaints about a national
advertising campaign that claimed SMA is the best formula in a
ruling against its then owner, Pfizer Nutrition.
Wyeth
advertising to health workers makes similar claims to those the ASA has
ruled against today, but the ASA refuses to take action over
advertising directed at health professionals (example below from Community Practitioner, July 2012).
Topics in the Q&A included the source of money for the City's planned pre-K
advertising campaign, the City's target number of pre-K applicants, whether Speaker Silver thinks the proposed income tax surcharge should be pursued next year, how the pre-K selection process will work, how the City will cover the approximately $ 40 million annual gap between the estimated cost of pre-K and the amount provided in the state budget, when parents will learn whether their pre-K application has been accepted, how the City will collect data and measure success of the pre-K program, whether the existing pre-K application process will be changed, how the City will use money from the anticipated school bond issue, the mayor's reaction to a 2nd Circuit
ruling that City may bar religious groups from renting after - hours space in public schools, the status on a proposed restaurant in Union Square, a tax break included in the state budget that provides millions of dollars to a Bronx condominium project, the «shop & frisk» meeting today between the Rev. Al Sharpton and Police Commissioner Bratton and a pending HPD case
against a Brooklyn landlord.
Class action lawsuit filed
against Irving - based True.com dating website Website terms incorporated by «continue» button,
rules US court Is True.com Being Untrue to
Advertising Partners?
Independent schools in Kent are openly
advertising their success at coaching pupils to pass an 11 - plus test,
against their council's
ruling banning such tutoring.
This order concerns violations by Southwest Airlines Co. (Southwest) of the full - fare
advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84 (a), and the statutory prohibition
against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.
This consent order concerns advertisements published by Compania Mexicana de Aviacion S.A. de C.V. (Mexicana) that failed to comply with the Department's
rule on full fare
advertising, 14 CFR 399.84, and thereby violated the statutory proscription in 49 U.S.C. § 41712
against unfair and deceptive practices.
This order concerns violations by AirTran Airways, Inc., (AirTran) of the full fare
advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84 (a), and the statutory prohibition
against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.
This consent order concerns radio advertisements by Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana, S.A., (Iberia Airlines) that fded to comply with the Department's
rule on fare
advertising, 14 CFR 399.84, and thereby violated the statutory proscription in 49 U.S.C. § 41712
against unfair and deceptive practices.
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today assessed a civil penalty of $ 40,000
against Qantas Airways, a carrier based in Australia, for violating federal aviation laws and the Department's
rules prohibiting deceptive price
advertising in air travel.
This consent order concerns Internet advertisements by Globester, LLC (Globester), that violated the Department's full - fare
advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR Part 399, the Department's code - share disclosure
rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition
against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.
On February 6, 2013, Mr. Benjamin Edelman (the Complainant) filed a third - party complaint under 14 CFR 302.401
against British Airways PLC (British Airways), alleging that the carrier failed to properly disclose and provide adequate justification for carrier - imposed surcharges and to comply with the Department's «full fare»
advertising rule on its On Business company travel website.
n separate cases, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today assessed civil penalties
against Continental Airlines and US Airways for violating the Department's
rules prohibiting deceptive price
advertising in air travel.
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today assessed a civil penalty
against TACA International Airlines for violating the Department's
rules prohibiting deceptive
advertising of airfares.
This notice is intended to provide guidance on two matters related to compliance with 14 CFR 399.84, the Department's
rule on full fare
advertising, and the underlying statutory proscription in 49 U.S.C. § 41712
against unfair and deceptive trade practices.
[67] In 2010, the FTC announced it would charge the ITA for violating FTC
rules against deceptive
advertising, and the suit was later settled.
All useless rubbish that goes
against every Principle in the IPCC Communication handbook and breaks every
rule in the Marketing handbook of Common Sense and breaks every known fact in the scientific research finding of psychology, sociology,
advertising, marketing, public communications, cognitive science and political science.
While there is absolutely nothing wrong with using outside and creative talent to craft a blog, a lawyer that uses a «ghost blogger» without a disclaimer, to publicly
advertise the lawyer's engagement with and competence in a particular area, violates
Rule 7.1's prohibition
against misleading statements or claims in public communications about the lawyer or the lawyer's services.
The recent story of the Virginia State Bar's misconduct charges
against a Virginia attorney once again raises questions about the intersection of lawyers blogging and ethics
rules relating to
advertising.
There are prohibitions
against «an alluring but insincere offer to sell a product or service which the advertiser in truth does not intend or want to sell», and it is a
rule that «No advertisement containing an offer to sell a product should be published when the offer is not a bona fide effort to sell the
advertised product».
State
rules against subjective claims «remain one of the last bastions of restrictions on attorneys»
advertising,» Stern asserts.
The Committee on Attorney
Advertising says in Opinion 39 that ads trumpeting a lawyer's inclusion in the two rankings violate the
rule of professional conduct
against suggestions that one lawyer is better than another.
The recent story of the Virginia State Bar's misconduct charges (PDF)
against Virginia attorney Horace Hunter once again raises questions about the intersection of lawyers blogging and ethics
rules relating to
advertising.
«There but for the Grace of Nancy Main Bloggers Keep On Blogging Out
Against N.Y.'s Proposed
Advertising Rules»
Genuine issues of fact precluded summary judgment on a consumer's claims
against a seafood producer for allegedly making unlawful, false, and misleading
advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014
advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False
Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014
Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has
ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh, L.).
These means may include provisions whereby persons or organisations with a legitimate interest under national law in the withdrawal of
advertising which is incompatible with this Directive may take legal proceedings
against such
advertising or bring such
advertising to the attention of an administrative body competent to give a
ruling on complaints or to institute the appropriate legal proceedings.
If the government actually wants to protect the public
against Facebook abusing its power, it would need to go harder than the Honest Ads Act that would put political
advertising on Internet platforms under the same scrutiny regarding disclosure of buyers as the
rules for TV and radio
advertising.
Plus, if you're sending out the same thing, chances are high that you are
advertising or soliciting, both of which are
against the
rules.
Considering that they can now download and print out the sold listing itself from a certain site which openly and wrecklessly publishes every single one of them (
against advertising rules governing REALTORS), they have a document mortgage lenders ask for.