Sentences with phrase «rules against them if»

A small business that has suffered loss as a result of a breach of competition law rules, but which can not afford the costs of litigation in the High Court, and the possibility of an adverse costs ruling against them if they lose, can shift that risk to the third - party litigation funder.

Not exact matches

If you run poor meetings by letting people talk too long then don't be surprised if people push back against the no devices rulIf you run poor meetings by letting people talk too long then don't be surprised if people push back against the no devices rulif people push back against the no devices rule.

And the 438th rule of business states, «If you benefit from the sneaky behavior of others, at some point the sneaky person will use the sneaky behavior against you.»

Most registrars have rules against using false names, and you'll run the risk of not receiving important notices if you do so.

Any refusal by Newfoundland and Labrador to lift minimum processing rules could trigger complaints under the pact which, if upheld, may result in penalties against Canada.

If those efforts fail, by using our Site or other online service, you agree that any complaint, dispute, or disagreement you may have against NBCUniversal, and any claim that NBCUniversal may have against you, arising out of, relating to, or connected in any way with these Terms of Service, our Privacy Policy, or any NBCUniversal Transactions or Relationships shall be resolved exclusively by final and binding arbitration («Arbitration») administered by JAMS or its successor («JAMS») and conducted in accordance with the JAMS Streamlined Arbitration Rules And Procedures in effect at the time the Arbitration is initiated or, if the amount in controversy exceeds $ 100,000, in accordance with the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules And Procedures then in effect (respectively, the «Applicable Rules»If those efforts fail, by using our Site or other online service, you agree that any complaint, dispute, or disagreement you may have against NBCUniversal, and any claim that NBCUniversal may have against you, arising out of, relating to, or connected in any way with these Terms of Service, our Privacy Policy, or any NBCUniversal Transactions or Relationships shall be resolved exclusively by final and binding arbitration («Arbitration») administered by JAMS or its successor («JAMS») and conducted in accordance with the JAMS Streamlined Arbitration Rules And Procedures in effect at the time the Arbitration is initiated or, if the amount in controversy exceeds $ 100,000, in accordance with the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules And Procedures then in effect (respectively, the «Applicable Rules»if the amount in controversy exceeds $ 100,000, in accordance with the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules And Procedures then in effect (respectively, the «Applicable Rules»).

But if either court rules against the government, an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court seems certain.

However, the often - conflicting local and federal drone rules pose potential problems if there is a legal dispute that puts the local government against federal authorities, Michel explained.

«If we have a trader that trades bitcoin, I would fire them in a second, for two reasons: It is against our rules and they are stupid, and both are dangerous,» he said at an investor conference.

If the class - action lawsuit against Honda, Nissan, Toyota and Ford rules in favor of the plaintiffs he notion of making money at all costs will also prove to be catastrophic at these companies.

He added that if the UK did try to offer tax rulings or introduce tax incentives that were contrary to the EU's rules against unfair tax competition between members, it could actually put companies off due to worries about retaliation.

Supporters of net neutrality threatened to go to court if Trump administration regulators move to weaken the rules barring discrimination against web sites and online services.

«If it's a fixed set of rules, with players acting according to preexisting behaviors, then it becomes a sufficiently well - defined problems that you can optimize against and the machine will do better than people,» he says.

If adopted, the new rules would ban large broadband firms like Verizon and Comcast from purposefully slowing down or discriminating against different types of data, but they would allow content providers to pay extra to access a virtual Internet fast lane.

«If Congress passed this bill that the American Bankers Association wants, how many community bank mortgages would be eligible for QM that aren't currently eligible... and how does that stack up against the number of mortgages held by Well Fargo, Citibank, JPMorgan and the other giants that would become eligible under this change in the rules?»

Thousands of financial and insurance services businesses may decide against advising consumers about the safety and protection of qualified annuities if the DOL rule is implemented as it is written.

If the proposal doesn't comply with the Senate's rules, an ensuing fight could pit conservatives against moderates and institutionalists — and could edge Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R - KY) closer to completely eliminating the legislative filibuster, a move with far bigger implications than health care policy.

If the WTO rules against the United States, it could then authorize the complaining nation to retaliate proportionally.

What happens if the Superior Court rules against Uber?

If the Floor Proposal is presented at the meeting, the proxy holders will have discretionary voting authority under Rule 14a - 4 (c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the Floor Proposal and intend to exercise such discretion to vote AGAINST such proposal.

For example, if a 100 share restricted stock unit award is made under the 2014 Plan, the award would count as 200 shares against the 2014 Plan's share limit after giving effect to the 2:1 premium share counting rule.

The lawsuit, which claims Levandowski had a long relationship with Uber before leaving Alphabet, could severely handicap the company's autonomous efforts if a judge rules against Uber.

I don't think I'm that much against link buying personally but if it's against the «rules» set out by those who regulate (and their rules are there for fairness) I can not do it myself.

Some credit card companies have a hard - and - fast rule against approving an application if you've gone through a bankruptcy.

The wise move would be to let it be or create Safe Harbor, but this one is subject to some pain if rules come out against it as a security.»

If you were to look at many (if not most) college campuses in the US, you'd find a similar rule against discriminatioIf you were to look at many (if not most) college campuses in the US, you'd find a similar rule against discriminatioif not most) college campuses in the US, you'd find a similar rule against discrimination.

Beg from you to support and stand by the legally elected ruling party against those militants within the opposition who are breaking down our country and killing the youth... those if they come up to rule will incur bloodshed every where and will stretch their bloodshed to reach every corner of this Arabian Peninsular... take my word for it they are evil and worse than that who you dumped into the sea...

But I think maybe that's all besides the point if it's against the rules.

If he rules against Prop 8, it will likely mean states will no longer be able to get away with a ban on same - sex marriages...

If there is a God and there is just as much for as against, But lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With man he only wants those with the faith to believe based on His book and faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.

In the pages of the Wall Street Journal, Peggy Noonan wonders if a string of failures for the Obama administration counts as mounting evidence not only against his primary claim to rule, executive competence, but also against the undergirding premises of liberal political philosophy.

He did not know whether any allowance was made for the age of the accused nor «whether pardon is given to those who repent» nor «whether punishment attaches to the mere name apart from secret crimes, or to the secret crimes connected with the name».3 In reply, Trajan wrote that Christians «are not to be sought out, but if they are accused and convicted, they must be punished — yet on this condition, that whoso denies himself to be a Christian, and makes the fact plain by his action, that is by worshipping our gods, shall obtain pardon on his repentance, however suspicious his past conduct may be».4 The Emperor Hadrian (76 - 138; ruled 117 - 138) made clear that slanderous accusations against Christians were unacceptable and that it had to be proved that they had acted contrary to the laws.

If they rule against Landmark Protection, I imagine a large number of «decent christians» will pray for their deaths, and some will make death threats.

Still, the case against teleological ethics may here offer this response: Granting the difference between direct and indirect applications, this yields only the familiar distinction between «act - teleology» and «rule - teleology, «3 is problematic for the following reason: Social practices or patterns of social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to produce.

They worship tradition, dress up in gaudy expensive clothes and march around, making arbitrary rules and regulations about every little thing, thinking if they do these things and make magical gestures that this somehow «cleanses» the outside of the cup, yet Jesus already knew of their type of priest in the old days, speaking against Pharisees for doing the exact same things the Catholics have been doing for centuries.

1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women, children as spoils of war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women / children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give to the poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your family and yourself to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give to the poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next to impossible for rich to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast for Lent in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes with sword, turns families against each other, those that love family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others, go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide for your family, you are an infidel)

Often times, the religious rights are self - righteous, but their lives may be full of conflicts against the Bible teaching; as the article points out, you can not follow all the rules laid out in the Old testaments, and if you believe the Bible literally, why do many religious rights do not follow as the Bible literally says.

If only he had read his Aristotle, he would know that money making easily becomes a rule over against wealth in terms of productivity.

In the prophetic faith, if not always in specific articulation, all men and all nations are in rebellion against God, denying in multiple ways the appropriate terms of human existence under the active rule of the righteous Yahweh.

Your arguments are absurd, immaterial to the issue, and if you were arguing this in a court of law, you would most assuredly be ruled against.

Agreed, but the general rule of thumb is if it goes against the revealed word of God, and no one else in your community can affirm it, it can be deemed as false

If one really wants to live by the Golden Rule they will inform someone when they are sinning against God.

Prediction: If the Supreme Court rules against Obamacare or whatever you want to call it, the insurance companies will have a green light.

------------------ So, if a corporation can be defined as a person, then what is the legal argument against the SCOTUS ruling?

PFC Luna, it seems as if upon further reflection, military officials have ruled against you, and determined that standing at attention demonstrates appropriate respect.

If the State says we can not allow religious symbols on public ground, then the church should be allowed to have leniency against rules that tells them that they need to actively do something they feel strongly against.

If you look at the prophets and saints you see they almost always went against the perceived «rules» or social norms of the day.

A 2015 case in Washington ruled against pharmacists who refused to carry the drugs; however, state law allows that «an individual pharmacist with religious objections may refuse to fill the prescription if another pharmacist working for the pharmacy does so.»

ive been wrestling since i was 9 years old and when i went into high school i had to wrestle a girl... growing up learning to wrestle i had ended up having violent style, i never was dirty or broke rules but i was taught to do anything in your power to win whehter it was to club down the head or grab the throat to gain position etc. unfortunately i was in the postion to wrestle a girl once and at the time i did nt care who you were boy / girl, white / black / purple it did nt matter im was going to go out there bounce your head of the mat and bury you, so i went out there and wreslted the same way i always wrestled, 110 % and always to put your oppenents back through the mat i dditn change my style at all bc she was a girl i wrestled the same against everyone but after i pinned her in the first minute i did nt even realize that i broke her ribs when i power doubled through her, now after that for the rest of the tournament i was heckled and berated for forcefully beating a girl ppl were telling my parents «hey, looks like you raised a wife beater» etc. etc.... ever since then i refused to wrestle girls and thank go i eventually grew out of the lower weights, moral of the story is that is great and all that girls are wrestling but they shouldnt wrestle boys even if they know what they are getting into because 1.

In the best tradition of those with everything to gain and nothing to lose by fighting, if necessary against the rules for what they want, the friaries of Erfurt and the six other Communities who had joined together to send the deputation immediately sent another two friars off to Rome, with a further objection and request.