The rules of behavior of these two systems are very different, and the collision is disrupting both.
Not exact matches
And the 438th
rule of business states, «If you benefit from the sneaky
behavior of others, at some point the sneaky person will use the sneaky
behavior against you.»
When companies create ridiculous and demoralizing
rules to halt the outlandish
behavior of a few individuals, it's a management problem.
Best
of all, Nimble has a
rules engine that helps the software learn from user
behavior and predict increasingly relevant contacts and activities.
As Harvard's David Weinberger pointed out in a recent post, Reddit has always been a semi-autonomous community, one that operates with only a very loose set
of rules about
behavior.
It is a set
of simple, powerful
rules that govern the internal
behavior of any team, organization, family and even nation.
I like to think that my biggest contribution to the whole process was a single sentence: «A great culture has to be built on expectations
of performance, not
rules of behavior.»
«If it's a fixed set
of rules, with players acting according to preexisting
behaviors, then it becomes a sufficiently well - defined problems that you can optimize against and the machine will do better than people,» he says.
To credulously accept this sort
of response, on an issue as important as this one, is
behavior unfit for any citizen
of a free country, where safeguarding the
rule of law is a civic responsibility.
It would be quite unfortunate if the fundraising
behavior of the Unicorn herd led to increased SEC involvement and
rules with respect to private venture - backed startups.
Recent developments, including ongoing investigations into bribery and corruption at the Company's subsidiaries in Mexico, China, Brazil, and India; new revelations
of accounting fraud at the Company's China operations; a recent
ruling by a National Labor Relations Board Administrative Law Judge against the Company for its illegal discipline
of employees; and, the NLRB decision to authorize a nationwide complaint against the Company for violations
of the National Labor Relations Act, highlight the need for enhanced oversight
of Wal - Mart's corporate culture and
behavior.
Instead, the U.S. government's opposition appears to center on a belief that legal settlements that pave the way for a merger — yet include lengthy
rules policing the
behavior of two companies — tend not to work.
Now the system appears to include a wealth
of additional
rules that may land a user on the travel ban list, suggesting China is slowly building its social credit database to include more and more sources
of unruly
behavior.
here's a kind
of proliferation
of conferences where the West in particular tries to promote its vision
of cyberspace and
rules of behavior for cyberspace, and so this is a competitor to it,» he says.
Companies that require managers to fire a certain percentage
of poor performers every year are simply imposing a
rule to try to correct for the poor leadership
behavior of managers.
Instead
of rules, however, Buffett added, «We count very heavily on principles
of behavior.»
The monetary policy debate over whether
rule - like
behavior is preferable to pure discretion dates back at least to Henry Simons in 1936.1 More recently, in their Nobel Prize - winning work, Finn Kydland and Ed Prescott demonstrated that a credible commitment by policymakers to behave in a systematic
rule - like manner leads to better outcomes than discretion.2 Since then, numerous papers using a variety
of models have investigated the benefits
of rule - like
behavior in monetary policy and found that there are indeed significant benefits.
Her allegations get at a core concern about the Trump presidency: that he may have used (indeed, may still be using) his money and power to make sure the ordinary
rules of human
behavior don't apply to him.
AT&T and other internet service providers face new
rules approved by a Democrat - led Federal Communications Commission, for example, prohibiting their use
of data such as web browsing
behavior without explicit consumer permission.
To believe without a God you have no
rules of behavior is very dangerous.
The standard
of the law
of love (Golden
Rule if you prefer) is a very high standard
of ethical
behavior.
When evil
rules the majority, then those laws will gradually be changed so that
behavior gradually becomes more inclined to selfish gratification at the expense
of others, wickedness then becomes expected, then it becomes normal, then it becomes the law.
You are arguing that the Golden
Rule includes punishment
of criminal
behavior like Bin Laden's; since Bin Laden would wish that any terrorist that attacked HIS country be punished the same way he is punished for attacking our country.
I was making the point that every person is different and there is no standard
of behavior or empathy that has been identified in males and females, no
rule of thumb you can apply.
And if God chooses to convict us through the words
of another broken human, we can easily interpret conviction as being judgmental,
behavior modification,
rule - making, legalism or worst
of all — shame.
We could strive for global
rules governing corporate
behavior that would place human well - being and the health
of the earth above corporate profits.
But where the study, for instance, only hinted at normalization, the draft forges ahead with a strong bias toward full acceptance
of gay unions, explicitly
ruling out the traditional opposition
of the church toward homoerotic
behavior.
Chang Qiang Zhu's
behavior began to suffer only after the immigration judge asked him specific questions, such as what form
of persecution the Apostle Paul used against Christians and what year Paul converted to Christianity, the Second Circuit Court
of Appeals recently
ruled.
Its cause may be cowardice, preventing us from making a revolution against inherited
rules of behavior.
It is said that if this life is all one can look forward to, nothing at all is worthwhile and that the amoral law
of the jungle will be the inevitable
rule of behavior.
Judging from their
behavior, far too many christians think they deserve the prize
of heaven without obeying the
rules Christ set down for them.
The roughly
rule utilitarian ethics I live by just defines not only basic
rules to live by on a daily basis, but more general acts
of «good» and «evil»
behaviors.
Gothard's teachings involve
rules upon
rules all dealing with the outward, dress, hair, smiling, bright eyes, no birth control or dating, no higher education for girls who must stay in the home until the father decides what they should do, how God blesses and is happy with you if you do such and such, so many
rules, those who really wanted to please God were under the weight
of things they could never accomplish... plus the male regime and women having to be careful not to defraud men by their dress or looks made it so easy for sexual predatory
behaviors to take hold and the woman at fault for the man's problems and such... ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder some
of the children
of this regime became athiests.
you know... a list
of rules about what not to talk about around Mr. and Mrs. Jenkins, a set
of behaviors to not do when in the presence
of Pastor Jim, a personal interest to keep hidden from Elder Bob, and my political leanings to stay silent about around Miss Morrell.
Moral principles were never regarded by them merely as satisfying
rules of behavior.
It is interesting to note that when the
rules governing human
behavior are reduced by the Hebrew people to the number
of ten, no fewer than two
of the ten have to do with human speech.
That this is the view
of the world can also be seen in almost all the proverbs, which are merely
rules for shrewd
behavior.
Though no rigid set
of rules can prescribe the appropriate
behavior and nuance for every case, the Rav undertook to provide certain general principles.
We try to help those who are waiting their turn to get into one
of the shelters or programs that provide housing and services, and some who can not get into shelters or programs because they are unable or unwilling to follow the
rules (which usually have to do with drug and alcohol usage and
behavior).
The church has misrepresented God's essence and neatly wrapped it into a
behavior modification system
of rules and regulations that we call love.
Moreover, the spiritual but not religious reflect the «me» generation
of self - obsessed, truth - is - whatever - you - feel - it - to - be thinking, where big, historic, demanding institutions that have expectations about
behavior, attitudes and observance and
rules are jettisoned yet nothing positive is put in replacement.
A bishop then must be blameless, the husband
of one wife, temparate, sober - minded,
of good
behavior, hospitable, able to teach; not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for money, but gentle, not quarrelsome, not covetous; one who
rules his own house well, having his children in submission with all reverence (for if a man does not know how to
rule his own house, how will he take care
of the church
of God?)
Mores and morals, laws and
rules, religions and rituals, have all come into being in the course
of human history to interpret the meaning
of life and to guide
behavior.
His only tools for change were good morals, eloquent words, honorable and natural
rules of conduct, good and truthful
behavior, kindness, and helpfulness.
The irony is that the central message
of Christianity, treating others as you would like to be treated, is completely overshadowed by the obsession with the
rules of the trivial
behavior mentioned above.
In that case, the «social» in «social justice» refers to something that emerges not organically and spontaneously from the
rule - abiding
behavior of free individuals, but rather from an abstract ideal imposed from above.
Except for the excessive and paranoid
rules around character,
behavior, church attendance, finances, thoughts, feelings, child rearing and the possibility
of demonic presences in your home and contents!
Therefore, the gospel can not be summarized in a doctrinal statement because statements
of belief usually do not also contain statements
of behavior, and even if they did, such «lists» soon become legalistic
rules, which undermines the gospel even further.
In his view (i) the concept
of autonomous hierarchy involves collections
of elements which are responsible for producing their own
rules as contrasted with collections which are designed by an external authority to have hierarchical
behavior.
For instance, the wife is working with the illusion that she was «no longer felt safe or loved» and «was suddenly bombarded with lies» when she found out that the
behavior of her husband was not that
of her understanding
of their unspoken
rules.