Sentences with phrase «rules of court provides»

The class proceedings rules of court provides for lawyers» fees to be approved by the court.

Rule 3.15 of the Rules of Court provides that the Court lacks jurisdiction to extend the time for adding and serving a party on an application for judicial review:

While the Rules of Court provide judges with discretion to allow expert evidence to be admitted even if technically non-compliant with the Rules of Court «if the interests of justice require it ``, this threshold often will not be met by an explanation of witness inexperience with the Rules of Court.

Note: There may be Rules of Court providing for when, and how, an application for review of the award can be made (see paragraph 123 (1)(sf)-RRB-.

Not exact matches

Now, documents filed in BNY's case in the past few weeks 2014 the court proceedings begin Monday 2014 provide unprecedented detail about how STARS was crafted at a time when banks and accounting firms were offering deals for multinational corporations to take advantage of loopholes in rules governing foreign tax credits.

That gave the FCC more authority to regulate ISPs, and provided its net neutrality rules a stronger legal footing after years of court battles.

While there will be many contentious edge cases to work through, over time blockchains will provide «rule - of - law - as - a-service» as an international, programmable complement to the Delaware Chancery Court.

Coinbase balked, but a court ruled that it must provide the records of roughly 14,000 customers, fewer than 1 percent of its patrons, who made transactions involving more than $ 20,000 of virtual currencies.

I do not yet know what all of Levin's proposed Liberty Amendments are — apparently, there is a new crack at Congressional term limits, which I am iffy about, an amendment for Supreme Court decisions to be expunged by 60 % of Congress or the States, which I am very iffy about, one providing Supreme Court term limits, which I am cool with, one requiring bureaucracy - ordered rule - changes to be subject to Congressional approval when they affect the economy by a certain amount, which I am also.

On July 14, the 10th Circuit Appeals Court in Denver ruled that Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic order that cares for the elderly, would also be required to provide contraception or opt out.

[Editor's Note: In light of yesterday's controversial Supreme Court ruling that Hobby Lobby does not have to provide certain forms of birth control to employees under the Affordable Care Act,...

Their licenses require them to broadcast «in the public convenience, interest and necessity,» and the courts have ruled that this means a broadcaster must provide diverse programming that meets the needs of its entire listening - viewing audience.

CNN: Pizza magnate wins temporary ruling on contraception coverage dispute The billionaire founder of Domino's Pizza has won a temporary court victory, with a federal judge blocking enforcement of part of the health care reform bill requiring most employers to provide a range of contraception and reproductive health services.

«Additional seats for minorities are not a matter of grace and benevolence of political parties, but are constitutional requirements so that the legitimate interests of the minorities are provided for,» ruled the court, according to UCA News.

They have already lost fights in the High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European Court of Human Rights after Mr Justice Hayden ruled that doctors could stop providing life - support treatment for the 23 - month old.

At the same time they should intercede with Congress (House and Senate Judiciary committees) to approve Rule 506 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which would provide such protection in federal courts.

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 26) provide that in the absence of statute or rule, the court shall follow «the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason and experience.&raRule 26) provide that in the absence of statute or rule, the court shall follow «the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason and experience.&rarule, the court shall follow «the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason and experience.»

The court ruled that, for purposes of summary judgment, the plaintiff class established a defect not because their individually purchased products contained biological contaminants, but rather because the act of recalling potentially contaminated food provided evidence of a product defect.

SB 219 would serve to clarify employer requirements and keep New Hampshire in compliance with current Federal laws and court decisions, including the March 25 Supreme Court ruling on Young vs United Parcel Service (UPS), which ruled in favor of Peggy Young to reverse the lower court's decision and to have a trial, after she sued UPS under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommodatcourt decisions, including the March 25 Supreme Court ruling on Young vs United Parcel Service (UPS), which ruled in favor of Peggy Young to reverse the lower court's decision and to have a trial, after she sued UPS under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommodatCourt ruling on Young vs United Parcel Service (UPS), which ruled in favor of Peggy Young to reverse the lower court's decision and to have a trial, after she sued UPS under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommodatcourt's decision and to have a trial, after she sued UPS under the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, for failure to provide pregnancy accommodations.

A top National Basketball Association executive on Wednesday told state lawmakers New York officials should provide a legal framework to allow sports gambling, pending the outcome of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

The Code provides in the same Rule that «A judge is permitted to make public statements (my emphasis) in the course of his or her official duties or to explain for public information the procedure of the court, general legal principles, or what may be learned from the public record in a case.

«While we understand the significant cost of complying with the recent court rulings overturning decades of New York State policy on 24 - hour homecare cases, we strongly believe that it is unfair to continue to ask home care workers to bear the financial burden of providing needed round - the - clock care.»

In its decision regarding Silver's case, the appeals court ruled in 2017 that the definition of official corruption provided to the jurors differed from the one used by the U.S. Supreme Court when it overturned the corruption conviction of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, and so it was possible the jury could have ruled differently had it been instructed on the updated definition of thecourt ruled in 2017 that the definition of official corruption provided to the jurors differed from the one used by the U.S. Supreme Court when it overturned the corruption conviction of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, and so it was possible the jury could have ruled differently had it been instructed on the updated definition of theCourt when it overturned the corruption conviction of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, and so it was possible the jury could have ruled differently had it been instructed on the updated definition of the law.

, from the very link you provided: «Court reversed itself in 1957 in the case of Yates v. United States, by ruling that teaching an ideal, no matter how harmful it may seem, does not equal advocating or planning its implementation.»

Attorney Steven Molo notified the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Thursday that he'd like to ask the high court to review last week's ruling, which wiped out the conviction but also provided the government with assurance that there was sufficient evidence to convict Silver if a jury is properly instructed on the law and decides to dCourt of Appeals in Manhattan on Thursday that he'd like to ask the high court to review last week's ruling, which wiped out the conviction but also provided the government with assurance that there was sufficient evidence to convict Silver if a jury is properly instructed on the law and decides to dcourt to review last week's ruling, which wiped out the conviction but also provided the government with assurance that there was sufficient evidence to convict Silver if a jury is properly instructed on the law and decides to do so.

The rally, organized by the Rise and Resist and the Alliance for Quality Education (AQE) in recent weeks, is part of a statewide push to fulfill the 2007 Campaign for Fiscal Equity court ruling that mandates education funds be distributed to New York's school districts to ensure all schools can provide students with a «sound basic education.»

In her ruling on Monday, Justice Anwuli Chikere upon being provided with the details of the Supreme Court judgement which on March 18, held that the defendant has a criminal case to answer granted EFCC the leave to re-arraign the former governor.

Following the ruling of the Supreme Court, which effectively extended the nomination period to November 8, 2016, and following the hearing provided you today, we should be grateful if you would do the following.

In a swift reaction to the High Court ruling upon which it ordered the Federal Government and her to provide information relating to N30 trillion allegedly unaccounted for during the administration of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, immediate past Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo - Iweala said she wasn't served any court proceCourt ruling upon which it ordered the Federal Government and her to provide information relating to N30 trillion allegedly unaccounted for during the administration of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, immediate past Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo - Iweala said she wasn't served any court procecourt processes.

The Court is scheduled to rule after December 1st on the US Department of Justice's motion to compel New York State to comply with the MOVE Act requirement to transmit ballots to military and overseas voters not later than 45 days before election day for federal office rather than the 32 day deadline currently provided for in state statute.

There are unfunded mandates and lack of aid from the state, and while he has provided more money for education, it is less than the Campaign for Fiscal Equity settlement [the 2006 court ruling requiring the state to pay billions in backpay to shortchanged school districts]... When [Assembly Speaker Carl] Heastie proposed a slightly progressive income tax, he just rejected it.

He also said «If there are extra resources in the state budget, we must remember that the State Court of Appeals ruled — in the landmark Campaign for Fiscal Equity decision several years ago - that the children of this city deserve billions more in educational resources, and now is the time to provide it.»

But in her motion challenging the EFCC's ex parte application, Mrs. Jonathan, through her lawyers, argued that the EFCC's «Ex parte Originating Summons» was not one of the modes of commencement of action under Order 3, Rule 1 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure Rules) 2009, and that it was not known or provided for by any law or rules of cCourt (Civil Procedure Rules) 2009, and that it was not known or provided for by any law or rules of cRules) 2009, and that it was not known or provided for by any law or rules of crules of courtcourt.

A «democracy «where a Democrat for Governor promotes austerity budgets while providing tax cuts to the rich, where the Republicans demand even more money for the rich and an end to the New Deal, and where the Supreme court repeatedly rule in favor of the 1 % to buy our political system under the guise of free speech.

However, the counsel to the claimant F.A Ademu had filed a motion for default judgement against the defendant having failed to file their statement of defense within 30 days as provided in the state high court (civil procedure) rule 2006.

Primary legislation (the statutes enacted by sovereign legislatures, such as the British Parliament) provides a framework which is complemented by secondary law, in the form of rules drafted by government agencies and court rulings which establish legal precedents.

The Court of Appeals, New York's highest court, ruled in 2006 in the Campaign for Fiscal Equity case that the state had failed to meet its constitutional obligation to provide adequate education to New York City studCourt of Appeals, New York's highest court, ruled in 2006 in the Campaign for Fiscal Equity case that the state had failed to meet its constitutional obligation to provide adequate education to New York City studcourt, ruled in 2006 in the Campaign for Fiscal Equity case that the state had failed to meet its constitutional obligation to provide adequate education to New York City students.

Yesterday the US Supreme Court ruled that forcing some companies to provide women with free contraception was a violation of their religious freedom.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that asking companies to provide free contraception is a violation of religious freedom — a decision made without looking at the science

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler responded to the court ruling by holding out the possibility of appealing the decision: «We will consider all available options, including those for appeal, to ensure that these networks on which the Internet depends continue to provide a free and open platform for innovation and expression, and operate in the interest of all Americans.»

In any such proceeding, the court may make allowances to the attorney general as provided in paragraph six of subdivision (a) of section eighty - three hundred three of the civil practice law and rules, and direct restitution.

OUT-LAW.COM — Sep 9 — A US Court of Appeals has ruled that merely providing a link to a website's terms and conditions above a registration form's submit button is sufficient for establishing users» compliance.

The project is based on Laura Kaplan's book «The Story of Jane: The Legendary Underground Feminist Abortion Service,» which follows women who provided abortion services in the years before 1973's Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion.

South Carolina Circuit Court Judge Thomas W. Cooper Jr. ruled Dec. 29 in favor of eight small, rural districts, saying the state fails to provide the youngest children in those areas «the opportunity to obtain a minimally adequate education.»

The state's highest court, the Court of Appeals, apparently recognized this even as it approved DeGrasse's ruling, stating, «Decisions about spending priorities are indeed the Legislature's province, but we have a duty to determine whether the State is providing students with the opportunity for a sound basic educacourt, the Court of Appeals, apparently recognized this even as it approved DeGrasse's ruling, stating, «Decisions about spending priorities are indeed the Legislature's province, but we have a duty to determine whether the State is providing students with the opportunity for a sound basic educaCourt of Appeals, apparently recognized this even as it approved DeGrasse's ruling, stating, «Decisions about spending priorities are indeed the Legislature's province, but we have a duty to determine whether the State is providing students with the opportunity for a sound basic education.

Kansas City schools were already predominantly minority, and the Supreme Court had ruled in the Detroit case that surrounding school districts not found guilty of segregation could not be pulled into a case to provide more white students for desegregation.

In a unanimous ruling, the New York State Court of Appeals held last month that the Monroe - Woodbury school district was not required under state law to provide a separate facility for handicapped children from the Orthodox Jewish village of Kiryas Joel.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has ruled that a school district's failure to provide tenured public - school teachers with a hearing prior to dismissal violates the teachers» due - process rights under the 14th Amendment.

Child support can be a sticky issue in any state — especially when a child's education becomes a factor — but a recent Ohio Supreme Court ruling provides a bit of clarity for those whose situation may be made more complicated by home - schooling or distance - learning arrangements.

In April, the California Court of Appeal overturned the trial court's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group of families had challenged the constitutionality of state laws governing teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants tenure to teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisiCourt of Appeal overturned the trial court's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group of families had challenged the constitutionality of state laws governing teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants tenure to teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisicourt's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group of families had challenged the constitutionality of state laws governing teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants tenure to teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisions.)