Sentences with phrase «rules of court regulation»

This act will have the effect of preparing the way for the new rules of court regulation to be implemented.

The long awaited, new Alberta Rules of Court regulation is available.

Not exact matches

Through all of this, a particularly vocal constituency that favored maintaining net - neutrality regulations as they were prior to the court's 2014 ruling included a who's who of some of the most important technology companies, such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft.

But Kasich did sign into law a measure banning abortions after 20 weeks — another controversial regulation that could potentially brush up against previous court rulings, even though Kasich cited Supreme Court precedent for his veto of the «heartbeat» legislacourt rulings, even though Kasich cited Supreme Court precedent for his veto of the «heartbeat» legislaCourt precedent for his veto of the «heartbeat» legislation.

In January, a federal appeals court ruled that because ISPs are not regulated as utilities, equal access regulations could not apply to these providers, as they do with telecommunications carriers under the Communications Act of 1934.

Hwang is the co-founder of FiscalNote, a startup that uses data from things like congressional regulations and court rulings to predict future legislation and court cases.

In the event that we are not able to resolve a dispute, we each agree that any and all disputes, controversies, or claims arising under, arising out of, or relating in any way to this agreement, or the contractual relationship established by this agreement (whether in contract, tort, or under any statute, regulation, ordinance, or any other source of law) shall be resolved on an individual basis through binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association, in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's rules for arbitration of consumer - related disputes (accessible at https://www.adr.org/aaa/faces/rules)(except that you may assert individual claims in small claims court, if your claims qualify).

To comply with the rules and regulations of our courts, the SEC, the IRS, and other regulatory agencies, you need an experienced, independent valuation firm.

We are ruled by words ¯ words of encouragement, words of persuasion, and words that end up being laws, regulations, and court decisions.

The Kentucky Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that Medi - Share, which currently serves nearly 50,000 people in 49 states, offers a «shifting of risk» and thus shouldn't be exempt from state insurance regulations.

The reviewing court, however, rejected the lower court's ruling and found that the plaintiff's claims amounted to a violation of the FDA's regulation on «nutrient content claims.»

However, in 2006, the Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Association of the Philippines, made up of milk companies among others, succeeded in appealing to the Supreme Court for a temporary restraining order on the Code's revised implementing rules and regulations.

Removing names by due process, using the quasi-judicial methods outlined in the Public Elections (Registration of Voters) Regulations, 2016 (C.I. 91) and by the Supreme Court, is the democratic, constitutional and civilised way to go; unless we are already fed - up with the Rule of Law and Due Process and are longing and yearning for the return of dictatorial rRule of Law and Due Process and are longing and yearning for the return of dictatorial rulerule.

The Cuomo administration's 2012 regulations imposing stringent new suspension periods on licenses of drivers with repeat driving - while - impaired offenses on their records are legal, the state's highest court ruled unanimously today.

Other things the landlords wanted, but didn't get, were a longer time - frame for the rent - regulations extension (a full eight years, versus the four they got), and legislation that would address the 2009 Court of Appeals decision on Roberts v. Tishman Speyer, which ruled that apartments could not be deregulated if they received J - 51 incentives for property improvements.

Because in the Peskova ruling of May 2017 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) decided that a bird strike was an «extraordinary event» under EU flight compensation regulation 261 - with the result that airlines didn't have to pay compensation, just as they don't for delays caused by lightning strikes or severe weather events.

Prudence and common sense therefore requires the Commissioner on the strength of the decision of Ex Parte Papa Kwesi Nduom to see her way clearly to give each of the aspiring presidential candidates the opportunity to alter or amend his nomination forms in accordance with regulation 9 (2) of C.I. 94 to enable the processes to the election to proceed without any further delay instead of waiting for each aspiring candidate to secure a separate ruling from the Court.

Following three state appellate court rulings in the second appellate division in September 2017 requiring healthcare agencies to pay home care workers for all their hours on 24 - hour shifts, Governor Cuomo's Department of Labor issued «emergency regulations» in October consistent with contrary federal court rulings allowing payment for only 13 hours.

Ruling in a suit brought by Massachusetts over the regulation of car emissions, the court said that the EPA has the authority to regulate such climate - destabilizing greenhouse gases as carbon dioxide — something the agency had denied.

The San Juan Capistrano court ruling that seems to rule out as unconstitutional tiered pricing that «educates» water wasters is a punch in the face of efforts to establish regulation that follows the human behavior and responsiveness in order to minimize wastage,» he said.

The delay tactic has become a hallmark of Pres. Donald Trump's approach to environmental rules and other regulations, but the court decision pokes a hole in it.

After the U.S. Supreme Court last month ruled to delay implementation of Obama's Clean Power Plan on fighting emissions from power plants, new methane regulations could help Washington meet its pledges made in Paris.

The D.C. Circuit court ruled in favor of Verizon because of how the FCC had originally classified broadband providers of high - speed Internet as being exempt from «common carrier» regulations.

But as a law professor at Drake Law School who has been studying property transfers for years, I've seen that laws, regulations and court rulings are only recently trying to figure out how to handle the ever - changing realm of digital technology.

The court ruled that Japan's JARPA II program, which sought to take some 850 minke whales, 50 fin whales, and 50 humpback whales, was not for the purposes of scientific research as stipulated in the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling.

The Trump administration's 42 - page proposal for repealing former President Obama's Clean Water Rule largely builds its case on a 2009 split decision by the Supreme Court on federal regulation of swear words on television.

The department amended its regulations in the wake of a 1983 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in National Soft Drink Association v. Block that the department exceeded its rulemaking authority when it issued orders on the «time and place» in which junk food could be sold on school grounds.

A legal - reform advocacy group that contends numerous laws, court rulings, and regulations hamper schools in their job of educating students has launched a Web site to help dramatize its arguments.

By using standard notice - and - comment rule making, by bringing the agency's policy in line with the Supreme Court's interpretation of Title IX, by getting a better handle on the extent of sexual assault in educational institutions and effective prevention measures, and above all, by focusing regulations on improving the educational opportunities that we provide students rather than upending the sexual mores of society at large, they can demonstrate that not everyone appointed by President Trump need sink to his level.

So we see hundreds of thousands of pages of federal regulations, countless executive orders, federal guidance documents, and «Chevron deference,» the policy of court's trusting that federal agencies and their rules and interpretations are right.

In 2000, a federal district judge ruled that Arizona was violating this relatively obscure law, both by not spending enough on its Lau programs — a reference to a Supreme Court decision of 1974 and regulations of the federal Office for Civil Rights — and by failing to provide enough teachers, aides, classrooms, materials, and tutoring.

On June 27, the CA Superior Court issued a ruling finding that LAUSD has failed to comply with Proposition 39 and its implementing regulations in calculating school space, including the number of classrooms, offered to charter schools for the 2012 - 13 school year.

As per an email I received earlier today from Bruce (i.e., Sheri's husband / attorney who prosecuted her case), the Court otherwise «declined to make an overall ruling on the [New York growth] rating system in general because of new regulations in effect» [e.g., that the state's growth model is currently under review]... [Nontheless, t] he decision should qualify as persuasive authority for other teachers challenging growth scores throughout the County [and Country].

The General Attorney occupation covers professional legal positions involved in preparing cases for trial and / or the trial of cases before a court or an administrative body or persons having quasi-judicial power; rendering legal advice and services with respect to questions, regulations, practices, or other matters falling within the purview of a Federal Government agency (this may include conducting investigations to obtain evidentiary data); preparing interpretative and administrative orders, rules, or regulations to give effect to the provisions of governing statutes or other requirements of law; drafting, negotiating, or examining contracts or other legal documents required by the agency's activities; drafting, preparing formal comments, or otherwise making substantive recommendations with respect to proposed legislation; editing and preparing for publication statutes enacted by Congress, opinions or discussions of a court, commission, or board; drafting and reviewing decisions for consideration and adoption by agency officials.

In the Supreme Court ruling on the bank charges test case, the chief judge of the Supreme Court thought it important enough to say this ruling didn't stop people challenging fairness under «Regulation 5» of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (which the Supreme Court case did not cover).

In the Supreme Court decision in 2009, the chief judge thought it important enough to say this ruling didn't stop people challenging fairness under Regulation 5 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCCR), which the Supreme Court case did not cover.

... any county with a population of 200,000 or more may regulate or prohibit the running at large of dogs within said county, and cause such dogs as may be running at large to be impounded... Any person, firm or corporation who violates any rule or regulation... shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished as provided by the laws of this state in any court of competent jurisdiction, provided that in the case of continuing offenses, each day on which the offense occurs shall constitute a separate offense.

So one must feel like it was with some form of irony that on actual Ground Hog's Day, the city of Toledo announced that they plan to appeal last month's court ruling that the city's breed specific regulations are unconstitutional.

Basing its opinion on these studies, the Central Administration Court in Berlin, upheld a ruling that voided Lower Saxony's ban on Bull Terriers, American Staffordshire Terriers and Pit bull Terriers and regulation of Rottweilers and Dobermans.

Following the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007)-- which clarified that greenhouse gases are an «air pollutant» subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act (CAA)-- the Environmental Protection Agency promulgated a series of greenhouse gas - related rules.

The bill would block the implementation of the Clean Power Plan, kill new methane regulations, prohibit regulation of lead in ammunition and fishing tackle and not allow the EPA to implement the Waters of the United States rule that is currently blocked by a federal court.

We call BLM's rule — and a similar EPA regulation — the «little rules that could» because, since their inception, they've stood up to a barrage of attacks in court, from the Trump administration, and from members of Congress who are beholden to dirty fossil fuel interests.

However, before considering CO2 as a «criteria pollutant» subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court ruling requires the EPA to demonstrate by independent research that higher levels of CO2 are damaging to «human health and welfare.»

The court could rule before the end of Obama's term, and then the Supreme Court, which already issued a stay on enacting the regulation, would have to consider whether to take up the court could rule before the end of Obama's term, and then the Supreme Court, which already issued a stay on enacting the regulation, would have to consider whether to take up the Court, which already issued a stay on enacting the regulation, would have to consider whether to take up the case.

[10] Given the EPA's desire to transform the electricity sector, the original intentions of Section 111 (d), and the recent Supreme Court ruling on the tailoring rule, the regulations for existing power plants will face much - warranted legal scrutiny.

The court's rulings on these four rules have the potential to halt, delay, modify, or greatly increase the scope of greenhouse gas regulation under the CAA.

Industry is gearing up to challenge the power plant rules in court, as are many states, and the House and Senate will almost certainly pass Congressional Review Act resolutions of disapproval to overturn the regulations.

When the DC appeals court ruled that the EPA had the authority to regulate greenhouse gases on June 26, 2012, it brought to a close a process of regulation and court challenges that started in 1999.

First, they have to face the possibility that in the absence of some alternative method of reining in carbon emissions, the EPA will, in the end, be allowed by the courts to proceed with its draconian and expensive regulations, a possibility made more likely by the death of Justice Scalia, who voted with the majority in the Court's 5 - 4 decision to stay the application of EPA rules.

But the Court also found that the states and industry groups failed to establish their legal standing to request that a third component of the regulations, the EPA's Tailoring Rule, be overturned.