Sentences with phrase «rules of right conduct»

In this age of moral relativity, when relationships seem to be so easily trivialized and the impoverishment of other people is so easily neglected, it seems necessary to hear the Word of God from James, who chastises us for not living by the rules of right conduct.

Not exact matches

RMG reserves the right to immediately terminate your use of, or access to, this Site at any time if RMG decides at its sole discretion that you have breached this Agreement or any relevant law, rule or regulation or you have engaged in conduct that RMG considers to be inappropriate or unacceptable.

Doctrine and Covenants 134:10 10 We believe that all religious societies have a right to deal with their members for disorderly conduct, according to the rules and regulations of such societies; provided that such dealings be for fellowship and good standing; but we do not believe that any religious society has authority to try men on the right of property or life, to take from them this world's goods, or to put them in jeopardy of either life or limb, or to inflict any physical punishment upon them.

Thus, when visitors arrive from rural areas with very different rules of conduct and complain that they seem to have landed in a foreign country, they are, in a sense, absolutely right.

Respect for rules of conduct has been lost in the deafening and essentially empty rights - talk of our age.

(83) Say: Each one doth according to his rule of conduct, and thy Lord is best aware of him whose way is right.

The Arlington Heights Park District reserves the right to restrict entry to the facility and may ask persons to leave the facility as a result of not following the above rules or disorderly conduct or unsafe activity.

The conservative right could have conducted the leave campaign on the issues of democracy, rule of law and UK sovereignty, leaving the economics to the outcome of a subsequent election.

His careful attempts to position the party as a brake on the more right - wing instincts of the Conservatives have been blown off course by having to deal with serious allegations about Liberal Democrat conduct and defend arcane aspects of party rules and culture.

More so, it is unfair that while the NA has repeatedly affirmed its commitment to democratic rule and values, promotion and respect for Human Rights and above all conduct its operations in line with the Rules of Engagement (ROE), attempts are still being made to whip up anti-military sentiments through unwarranted antagonism from some media outlets.

[26] He also claimed that Government lawyers had not forced the judiciary to water down criticism of MI5, despite an earlier, draft ruling by Lord Neuberger, the Master of the Rolls that the Security Service had failed to respect human rights, deliberately misled parliament, and had a «culture of suppression» that undermined government assurances about its conduct.

«The review monitored troops closely in their operations to appraise their conduct, observance of rules of engagement and compliance with best international standard to ensure that human right remains sacrosanct.

He posits that the right way to think of quantum mechanics is as a set of rules about how to correctly conduct experiments.

In Revenue Ruling 57 - 127, the IRS Commissioner determined that funds from a government foundation used by an individual for the purpose of conducting a research project free from direction and control of the institution were not to be considered a fellowship because the foundation reserved rights in patents resulting from the research, thereby establishing a quid pro quo.

We reserve the right to immediately terminate or restrict your account or your use of the Tubi Services or access to Content at any time, without notice or liability, if Tubi determines in its sole discretion that you have breached these Terms of Use, violated any law, rule, or regulation, engaged in other inappropriate conduct, or for any other business reason.

The defendants claimed qualified immunity, which requires courts to rule in favor of a government employee unless the conduct violates «clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.»

For the purpose of assuring orderly and fair proceedings and to protect the basic civil rights of any accused person, the Board of Directors shall adopt and print rules of procedure and from time to time may amend these rules of procedure not inconsistent herewith for the conduct of such hearings, and such rules shall be binding upon the parties.

You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services or the Sites to take any actions that: (i) infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, discriminatory based on race, ethnicity, gender, sex or disability, pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on the Animal League or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN - SPAM Act of 2003); (vii) would encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal or international laws, rules or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interfere with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of the Animal League's or other's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other Animal League members, Site users or attempt to gain access to other Animal League members information, or otherwise mine information about Animal League members, Site users, or the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) are contrary to the Animal League's public image, goodwill, reputation or mission or otherwise not in furtherance of the Animal Leagues stated purposes.

The principle of the subordination of private property to the universal destination of goods, and thus the right of everyone to use, is a golden rule of social conduct and «the first principle of the whole ethical and social order.»»

The Law Society has an obligation to promote human rights in the legal profession and licensees are already bound by human rights equality, diversity and inclusion principles under their respective professional rules of conduct and the Code.»

While commercial parties may turn to arbitration as the choice dispute resolution mechanism in its transaction document, parties are advised to be alive to the fact that by adopting certain institutional arbitration rules within the arbitration agreement and conducting the arbitration under the auspices of those institutions, they will be taken to have agreed to waive their right to recourse against the award by way of appeal on a question of law in the context of domestic arbitrations.

As you can see, social media and social media content raise serious issues for the judiciary, with regards to independence, integrity and ethical standards, admissibility of evidence, the availability of ex parte information, the extent of judicial notice, practice rules, the right to a fair trial and juror conduct.

It said his conduct in opposing a development in his Toronto neighbourhood and later sitting on a three - judge Divisional Court panel that ruled against a controversial City of Toronto proposal for a streetcar right - of - way was «manifestly and totally contrary to the impartiality, integrity, and independence of the judiciary.»

However, irrespective of the rules of professional conduct, the last alternative is the «right» and only thing to do.

The defending narrative sees Henein's conduct through the lens of her protection of the rule of law, and the constitutional rights of her client.

For instance, one of the speakers on the call, Scott Wolfe, Jr., recently sued the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board in U.S. District Court, alleging that the state's recently amended rules of professional conduct regarding online legal communications restrict, unduly burden, and chill the exercise of commercial speech rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments the U.S. Constitution.

She drafted Opinions, «Rule 36» indications under the Commission's Rules of Procedures and prepared Observations in response to UK Government's Observations; and conducted a joint seminar, which related to case studies on international human rights law to legal practitioners and non-governmental organisations.

Before trial, the criminal law seeks to protect an accused from being conscripted against him - or herself by the confession rule, the right to remain silent in the face of state interrogation into suspected criminal conduct, and the absence of a duty of disclosure on the defence: R. v. Hebert, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 151.

But neither the BC human rights code nor the LSBC rules of professional conduct govern the behaviour of a private religious university.

The weighing process that will be used by the Board gives equal consideration to protecting employee rights and the importance of a company implementing work rules that allow the company to regulate the conduct of its employees in the workplace for legitimate business reasons.

For example, rules limiting judicial campaign conduct have been attacked as unduly restrictive of candidate's free speech rights.

Typically an intern host organization will conduct work in the areas of human rights, good governance and / or the rule of law, and will be working towards increasing access to justice for marginalized or underserved populations.

I also found it fascinating that the COA panel upheld the family court judge's right not to conduct a Rule 59 hearing at least, in part, because of the thoroughness of the Rule 59 motion filed by the husband's attorney:

This case, arising from the discipline by the Barreau du Québec of one of its members, involves the rules of professional conduct of a law society, and the intersection of these rules with both the administration of justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the «Charter»).

¹ The term «professionalism» reflects the codes of conduct that serve as guidance for what a lawyer should understand to be right and wrong — rules that shape what it means to be a professional and what the public can in turn measure our conduct by.

Clearly, discriminating against employees or clients, in contravention of our existing duty (under the Ontario Rules) not to discriminate (and Ontario Human Rights law) would run afoul of that obligation, but then, we already have an explicit (and distinct) obligation which addresses such conduct.

The object and meaning of the rule is this: that as, by reason of the complexity and difficulty of our law, litigation can only be properly conducted by professional men, it is absolutely necessary that a man, in order to prosecute his rights or to defend himself from an improper claim, should have recourse to the assistance of professional lawyers,... to use a vulgar phrase, that he should be able to make a clean breast of it to the gentleman whom he consults with a view to the prosecution of his claim, or the substantiating of his defence... that he should be able to place unrestricted and unbounded confidence in the professional agent, and that the communications he so makes to him should be kept secret, unless with his consent (for it is his privilege, and not the privilege of the confidential agent), that he should be enabled properly to conduct his litigation.

Moreover, not all discrimination violates Ontario human rights law (or, since the duty is defined by reference to Ontario human rights law, the rules of professional conduct)-- it contains numerous carve outs (similar to those which apply to TWU under BC law) which might affect lawyers.

The Department decided that informing consumers of their privacy rights and of the activities of covered entities with which they conduct business was too important a goal of this rule to exempt any entities.

The preamble to the proposed rule listed the following as examples of health oversight agencies that conduct oversight activities relating to the health care system: state insurance commissions, state health professional licensure agencies, Offices of Inspectors General of federal agencies, the Department of Justice, state Medicaid fraud control units, Defense Criminal Investigative Services, the Pension and Welfare Benefit Administration, the HHS Office for Civil Rights, and the FDA.

Based on these assumptions, the Department concludes that the principal economic effect of the final rule would be to expand the right to request amendments to protected health information held by a health plan or provider to those who are not currently covered by amendment requirements under state laws or codes of conduct.

The ruling comes after the Law Society of Upper Canada applied for a declaration that the Law Society Act applies to employees of the Crown (in right of Ontario) who provide legal services, and that Crown employees who provide legal services to the public respecting employer conduct prohibited by the OHSA are not exempt from the LSA paralegal licensing requirement (Bylaw 4).

«Students attending TWU are free to adopt personal rules of conduct based on their religious beliefs provided they do not interfere with the rights of others.

After considering the effects of the project on the rights of individuals and obtaining the agreement of the Chief Justice of Québec or the Chief Justice of the Superior Court or the Chief Judge of the Court of Québec, according to their jurisdiction, and after consulting the Barreau du Québec and, if applicable, the Chambre des notaires du Québec or the Chambre des huissiers de justice du Québec, the Minister of Justice, by regulation, may modify a rule of procedure, or introduce a new one, for a specified time not exceeding three years, for the purposes of a pilot project conducted in specified judicial districts.

Even more important perhaps is the fact that, right from the start, the police took on the codes not as «best practice», ie rules to be followed by other people, but as the ordinary way of conducting business, ie rules to be followed by everyone.

Moreover, the Court ruled that Article 9 of the Bill of Rights 1689 confirms that «it is Parliament and not the courts that should question limitations on freedom of speech, which is consistent with the Legislative Assembly's position that it should deal with regulating the conduct of its members, including their speech» (McIver, at para 52).

The company reserves the right to discipline and / or terminate any employee who violates Local Driving School policies, practices or rules of conduct.

Enforcement of the user content or conduct rules set forth in these Terms is solely at Digital Trends» discretion, and failure to enforce such rules in some instances does not constitute a waiver of our right to enforce such rules in other instances.

You represent and warrant to Evolution Coaching that nothing submitted by you to the Site shall contain any content which (i) is harassing, libelous, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, racially offensive, inaccurate, or otherwise objectionable, (ii) violates any law, rule, or regulation, (iii) infringes, misappropriates, or otherwise violates any copyright, trademark, or other intellectual property right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or any other right of any entity or person, (iv) encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, national, or international law or regulation, (v) advertises or otherwise solicits funds or is a solicitation for goods or services or (vi) encourages the use of controlled substances.

Judges preside over court hearings and trials, supervise legal proceedings, and uphold the rights of individuals involved in legal processes to ensure that trials are conducted according to established rules and procedures.