Not exact matches
The class action, filed in United States District
Court, Southern District
of New York, and docketed under 18 - cv - 02213, is on behalf
of a class consisting
of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations
of the federal securities
laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a)
of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and
Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain
of its top officials.
The state
of Florida passed a separate, and more strident, physician gag
rule (known as the «Docs vs. Glocks»
law) in 2011 — but a federal appeals
court overturned that this past February.
The class action, filed in United States District
Court, for the District
of Illinois, Eastern Division, is on behalf
of a class consisting
of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Akorn's securities between March 1, 2017 through February 26, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by defendants» violations
of the federal securities
laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a)
of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and
Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain
of its top officials.
Unlike Hobby Lobby, where the High
Court ruled narrowly to allow for - profit companies to exempt themselves from aspects
of the health - care
law for religious reasons, the latest cases deal with broader elements that underpin the ACA.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme
Court ruled Tuesday that whistleblower protections in a federal
law passed in response to the Enron financial scandal apply broadly to employees
of publicly traded companies and contractors hired by the companies.
A Circuit
Court of Appeals in San Francisco has
ruled that a challenge to the state's 145 - year - old ban on prostitution may proceed, saying a 2003 Supreme
Court ruling opened the door for closer scrutiny
of the
law.
And yet emails received in the
rule - free
court of public opinion may not be admissible in a
court of law, where strict
rules of admissibility apply.
But Kasich did sign into
law a measure banning abortions after 20 weeks — another controversial regulation that could potentially brush up against previous
court rulings, even though Kasich cited Supreme Court precedent for his veto of the «heartbeat» legisla
court rulings, even though Kasich cited Supreme
Court precedent for his veto of the «heartbeat» legisla
Court precedent for his veto
of the «heartbeat» legislation.
However, he praised the U.K.'s legal system, saying «we have the good fortune to live in a country where everyone... even government is subject to the
rule of law, so the government will comply with the judgment
of the
court and do all that is necessary to implement it.»
The
court's decision will allow more room for innovation, and consumers will have more choices to determine for themselves how they access and experience the internet,» Verizon's general counsel
of public policy,
law and security, Randal Milch, said after the
ruling was handed down.
The District
Court of Frankfurt has
ruled that Uber is not operating within German
law, and the ride - hailing company could face a fine
of 250,000 euros, or $ 328,000, per violation.
Lucas took the designer to
court for copyright infringement, but the
court ruled the replicas were not covered by copyright
law because they are not works
of art.
«It is highly ironic that Mr. Black is the one accused
of showing insufficient respect for our
rule of law or a failure
of trust in our
courts and juries,» Gurland quipped.
«Their efforts to undermine the agreements were dishonourable and deserving
of censure,» the Appeal
Court said in its
ruling, noting, however, that the state
of Canadian
law around grey marketing remains unsettled.
In a recent
court case, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marij
court case, the 9th Circuit
Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marij
Court of Appeals
ruled that the Department
of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state
laws regarding medical marijuana.
While there will be many contentious edge cases to work through, over time blockchains will provide «
rule -
of -
law - as - a-service» as an international, programmable complement to the Delaware Chancery
Court.
In the event that we are not able to resolve a dispute, we each agree that any and all disputes, controversies, or claims arising under, arising out
of, or relating in any way to this agreement, or the contractual relationship established by this agreement (whether in contract, tort, or under any statute, regulation, ordinance, or any other source
of law) shall be resolved on an individual basis through binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association, in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's
rules for arbitration
of consumer - related disputes (accessible at https://www.adr.org/aaa/faces/
rules)(except that you may assert individual claims in small claims
court, if your claims qualify).
On July 8, the public got its first view into how the U.S. Department
of Labor will defend its fiduciary
rule when it filed a cross motion for summary judgment, asking the U.S. District
Court for the District
of Columbia to dismiss a
law suit brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
The
court could have
ruled that Citizens United was not the sort
of group to which the McCain - Feingold
law was meant to apply, or that the
law did not mean to address 90 - minute documentaries, or that video - on - demand technologies were not regulated by the
law.
After the Supreme
Court in 1911 struck down the form
of resale price maintenance enabled by fair trade
laws, 59 Congress in 1937 carved out an exception for state fair trade
laws through the Miller - Tydings Act.60 When the Supreme
Court in 1951
ruled that producers could enforce minimum prices only against those retailers that had signed contracts agreeing to do so, 61 Congress responded with a
law making minimum prices enforceable against nonsigners too.62
The U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals in Washington
ruled in favor
of the Fed in 2014, saying the agency had made a «reasonable interpretation»
of the
law.
A
court in Washington has
ruled that the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) violated the state's finance disclosure
law when it funneled millions
of dollars in dark money from its major corporate members to the campaign that defeated a 2013 ballot initiative to label food containing genetically modified organisms, or GMOs.
Vice President Mike Pence called former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who was convicted
of federal contempt
of court last year, a «champion
of... the
rule of law» and said he was honored that Arpaio attended an event with him on Tuesday in Tempe, Ariz..
You will want to discuss all
of your options with your attorney or tax advisor before taking action, especially if creditor protection is a concern for you, as the Supreme
Court has
ruled that Inherited IRAs are not protected under federal bankruptcy
laws (although state
law creditor protection
of inherited IRAs still varies).
The home - rental site filed a lawsuit Monday (June 27) in federal
court alleging
rules recently passed by the city
of San Francisco violate free speech and privacy
laws.
But he also acted in a manner consistent with the
rule of law as it has been clearly interpreted by the U.S. Supreme
Court.
He successfully argued that foreign and domestic investors had asserted viable «holder claims» seeking to recover investment losses due to their retention
of already - owned shares in reliance upon the fraud, which is believed to be the first
ruling by a U.S.
court sustaining such a theory under English common
law.
On 6 August 2013, Federal Judge Amos Mazzant
of the Eastern District
of Texas
of the Fifth Circuit
ruled that bitcoins are «a currency or a form
of money» (specifically securities as defined by Federal Securities
Laws), and as such were subject to the
court's jurisdiction, [274][274] and Germany's Finance Ministry subsumed bitcoins under the term «unit
of account» — a financial instrument — though not as e-money or a functional currency, a classification nonetheless having legal and tax implications.
Mr. Lieberman is working with the Firm's international clients to craft a response to the Supreme
Court's
ruling in Morrison v. Nat» l Australia Bank, Ltd., which limited the ability
of foreign investors to seek redress under the federal securities
laws.
Abortion has been legal in Canada since 1988, when the Supreme
Court of Canada
ruled that Canada's abortion
law violated Section 7
of the Charter
of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees «life, liberty and security
of the person.»
In 1911 a Federal
court ruled DuPont in violation
of antitrust
laws, and the following year ordered the complete dissolution
of Eastern as part
of a remedy.
A theory
of constitutional
law that may be out
of fashion in today's legal academy, but that fits comfortably within the modern conservative and the traditional liberal views
of the
courts, begins with certain basic premises: the existence
of law and the possibility
of meaningful
rules of law.
We are
ruled by words ¯ words
of encouragement, words
of persuasion, and words that end up being
laws, regulations, and
court decisions.
«The European
Court of Human Rights
ruled back in 2003 that Sharia
law is incompatible with the fundamental principles
of democracy.»
That's how I read the Supreme
Court's decision not to hear cases in which lower
courts ruled that marriage
laws in various states that recognize unions only
of a man and a woman are unconstitutional.
She said: «On the day when the Belfast
Court of Appeal
ruled that it is up to the Stormont Assembly to decide on abortion
law in Northern Ireland, the Government at Westminster has now decided to ride roughshod over the views
of the vast majority
of people in Northern Ireland.»
The New York Times: Irish Poised to Revisit Abortion
Law Abortion is back on the agenda in Ireland after a European
Court of Human Rights
ruling last year found the state in violation
of its own Constitution on the matter.
The Supreme
Court will
rule on the extent
of protections conferred by the state's constitution, with its findings potentially set to impact this summer's referendum on Ireland's restrictive abortion
laws.
In the United States, the Louisiana state Supreme
Court ruled last year that state
law does not require a priest to notify authorities after hearing evidence
of child abuse from a child making a confession.
In asking the government to affirm our right to practice religion by
rulings from the
courts and
laws of this land, we have placed ourselves in bondage to the government.
The fears about standing and about funding
of religious organizations are important questions
of law, but both were satisfactorily resolved under the Supreme
Court's traditional standing
rules and there is no reason to think RFRA would reopen the issue.
That wasn't even Olson's case, but with assists from a federal district
court judge who came out as being in a same - sex relationship only after
ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state
law, Olson and Boies did succeed in disenfranchising millions
of Californians on a procedural technicality.
'» As a legal organization, CRLP's mission is to establish and protect the
rule of law by advancing women's reproductive rights in the U.S. and around the world, whether at the UN, with governments, or in the
courts.
They know that the hands
of law - enforcement officers are tied by the
rulings of a libertarian Supreme
Court.
Your arguments are absurd, immaterial to the issue, and if you were arguing this in a
court of law, you would most assuredly be
ruled against.
They attended a school - board meeting in October 1993 where they distributed material citing federal
laws and
court rulings upholding the rights
of pregnant students to participate in public school extracurricular activities.
Despite having reservations about the
court's order, Mr Sharif decided to «show his respect for the judiciary and
rule of law».
The Supreme
Court ruled that Congress could not grant the president the authority to ignore - portions
of legislation that Congress had passed and the president had signed into
law.
Nonetheless, the Justices gravely declared that «the character
of a nation
of people who aspire to live according to the
rule of law» is ultimately to be measured by the people's willingness to put aside their deeply held moral and religious views and accept the
Court's pronouncements on this and other divisive questions.
In November, the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals in New Orleans
ruled a Mississippi
law was unconstitutional because it effectively closed the last clinic in the state.