EW: A few weeks ago, a New York judge issued
a ruling about the inequity of the education - funding system.
Not exact matches
Rather than making a series of empty, unfilled promises, these policies would actually improve teachers» working conditions, students» learning conditions, and school funding; would protect public schools from
inequities of funding caused by the proliferation of charter schools; and would «encourage» the decision makers who currently establish public education policy to play within the
rules, or forfeit the thing they are really most concerned
about: those sweet, sweet campaign contributions.
The commentaries
about the
inequities and irrationality of the legal class system at the 2017 CLOC Institute were fast and furious: from Richard Susskind's explanation
about the importance of the ABS
rules (alternative business structures) in the UK in breaking down walls to allow new ways for lawyers to collaborate and share accountability (and profits) with professionals from other disciplines and professions within the same workplace, to the battle cry so clearly articulated by Lucy Bassli (then of Microsoft and now of InnoLegal Services), demanding that we remove the term «non-lawyer» from our daily conversations and certainly from our value playbooks.
Its findings, based on two years of research and data, were grim: It saw growing social
inequities and the curtailing of the
rule of law and political freedoms in
about 40 nations, including some countries with rather advanced democracies.