It's why the courts are
ruling against prejudice bigots like you.
Not exact matches
Baxter Holmes of the Los Angeles Times reported a conversation overheard on an airplane implied that the NCAA could have had
prejudice towards Muhammad, and was going to
rule against him no matter what facts were brought forth.
Kanu and his co - accused alleged that the Judge had in the course of a
ruling he delivered on an application on 26 April expressed serious
prejudice against a member of the defence team.
The case was dismissed «without
prejudice,» meaning that Anversa and Leri can bring the issue back to court once an administrative hearing
rules for or
against them.
«Hereby stipulate that the claims within this adversary proceeding
against ECMC may and shall be dismissed without
prejudice, pursuant to Bankruptcy
Rule 7041, to permit Plaintiff to enter into a repayment program with the Department of Education.»
It was an effort to remind the public of the lingering, pervasive
prejudice in France — and the French court
ruled against him.
The judge
ruled specifically that the defendant was not on actual notice of the accident until over eight months after the accident and that the plaintiff failed to meet the necessary burden of showing how the district would not be «substantially
prejudiced» by allowing the plaintiff's case to proceed
against the defendants.
Chris Bryden and Michael Salter warn
against tampering with the & ldquo; without
prejudice & rdquo;
rule
It relied on a number of factors, including that the tribunal had awarded costs
against the commissioners because of their «serial failures to comply with the time limits in the tribunal
rules and its directions», which «hamper the administration of justice and can
prejudice the other party».
In a separate case, Chrysler Group LLC v. Walden, Grant held that compensation evidence «is subject to the
Rule 403 analysis weighing the evidence's unfair
prejudice against its probative value.»
Although the trial court
ruled that the driver's privacy was violated, the court still refused to suppress the evidence because it found the violation to be harmless error (the court essentially found that the violation of the driver's privacy did not result in any
prejudice against him to justify suppression of the evidence).
Under
Rule of Evidence 411, evidence that a witness was insured
against liability is admissible to prove their «bias» or «
prejudice».