They're waiting for Acting State Supreme Court Justice Gerald W. Connolly to
rule in the case which he is hearing at the Albany County Court House.
As reported in the December 26, 2011 issue of Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, Julie E. Green of Todd & Weld LLP received a favorable
ruling in a case which the firm took on a pro bono basis on behalf of John Sullivan, an inmate at MCI - Norfolk.
Not exact matches
At the opening of the trial
in Rome, the U.S. investment bank the other defendants asked a three - judge panel at the Court of Accounts,
which rules on abuses of public funds, to reject the
case in an acknowledgement that the judges do not have jurisdiction, Marco Fratini, one of the judges, said.
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision at the beginning of 2015 to accept the
case in which a court majority
ruled in June that state gay marriage bans are unconstitutional was a likely trigger, Warbelow said.
In her announcement, Gillibrand criticized the 2010 Supreme Court
case, Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission,
which ruled that the government should not regulate the amount of money corporations and unions can spend on campaigns.
For instance, we were once
in a proceeding
in which the judge made a
ruling on evidence presented at trial by opposing counsel that was going to fundamentally change the outcome of the
case.
As the judge
in the
case ruled, Apple played «a central role»
in convincing publishers that its model would raise e-book prices,
which it did.
While the Supreme Court
in October 2015 declined to review the
case, the justices
in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's
case,
in which a federal appeals court
in California had issued a potentially conflicting
ruling.
That includes the Byrd
rule,
which has two key provisions: It can add only a specified amount to the debt
in a 10 - year window —
in the Senate bill's
case, $ 1.5 trillion — and can't add any debt past then.
In these cases, the drone operator could record the adjacent property next to the home they are taking pictures of, which may result in a violation of the rule
In these
cases, the drone operator could record the adjacent property next to the home they are taking pictures of,
which may result
in a violation of the rule
in a violation of the
rules.
«This
case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that heard it,
which ruled in Yelp's favor and also found the claims not to be supported by credible evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.
Unless
rules governing narrow situations like this one are clearly spelled out, it would be hard to determine whether a company was simply conveying information or giving investment advice,
in which case it would have to register as a broker - dealer.
Last week a London court
ruled that a plumber was entitled to full employment rights despite being technically self - employed,
in a
case seen as a key test
which could force employers to start offering irregular workers benefits including pensions and holiday pay.
In every field, there are rules of success that you can either break (in which case, you'll be punished) or follow (in which case, you'll be rewarded
In every field, there are
rules of success that you can either break (
in which case, you'll be punished) or follow (in which case, you'll be rewarded
in which case, you'll be punished) or follow (
in which case, you'll be rewarded
in which case, you'll be rewarded).
In the former
case, a personal guarantee by the corporation's principals is usually required,
which makes an exception to the limited liability
rule.
In the
case of more traditional financial institutions, creditors have to abide by the Credit Practices
Rule,
which states that any financial institution, auto dealer, retailer or credit union must advise consumers about their legal obligations and more.
Nokia,
which is trying to boost its royalty income as its phone business slides, said it had filed
cases in the United States, Britain and Canada to enforce the arbitrator's
ruling.
In his majority opinion on the Illinois case, Judge Richard Posner said the Heller ruling guaranteed people the right to carry weapons «in case of confrontation,» which is not limited to the home, according to Slat
In his majority opinion on the Illinois
case, Judge Richard Posner said the Heller
ruling guaranteed people the right to carry weapons «
in case of confrontation,» which is not limited to the home, according to Slat
in case of confrontation,»
which is not limited to the home, according to Slate.
The
ruling marks the second time the high court has rendered an opinion
in the
case,
in which the state is seeking to hold Greenberg accountable for sham transactions at the insurer.
Observed the report: «The context
in which the policy was adopted and even the issue of whether a
rule or policy has been actually adopted are also important
in these
cases.»
The European Court of Justice is expected to
rule this year
in a major
case centered on whether Uber should be treated as a taxi service,
which would mean it was subject to rigorous safety and employment
rules, or merely as an online platform connecting independent drivers and waiting passengers.
«The Movants have had ample opportunity to intervene
in the multiple
cases challenging the so - called «Fiduciary
Rule»
in district courts around the country,
in appeals
in two other circuits courts, and
in this appeal,
which was decided by this Court more than a month ago,» the filing said.
Forking
rule: «REQ - 7 Difficulty adjustment
in case of hashrate drop In case the MTP of the tip of the chain is 12h or more after the MTP 6 block before the tip, the proof of work target is increased by a quarter, or 25 %, which corresponds to a difficulty reduction of 20
in case of hashrate drop
In case the MTP of the tip of the chain is 12h or more after the MTP 6 block before the tip, the proof of work target is increased by a quarter, or 25 %, which corresponds to a difficulty reduction of 20
In case the MTP of the tip of the chain is 12h or more after the MTP 6 block before the tip, the proof of work target is increased by a quarter, or 25 %,
which corresponds to a difficulty reduction of 20 %.
There are exceptions to this
rule if your home is
in a «high cost» area,
in which case loan amounts can rise to more than $ 679,650.
In that case, a NAFTA tribunal ruled 2 - 1 that an environmental assessment process, which resulted in a U.S. firm being denied a permit to dig a massive quarry in an ecologically sensitive region of Nova Scotia, violated the firm's NAFTA investor protection
In that
case, a NAFTA tribunal
ruled 2 - 1 that an environmental assessment process,
which resulted
in a U.S. firm being denied a permit to dig a massive quarry in an ecologically sensitive region of Nova Scotia, violated the firm's NAFTA investor protection
in a U.S. firm being denied a permit to dig a massive quarry
in an ecologically sensitive region of Nova Scotia, violated the firm's NAFTA investor protection
in an ecologically sensitive region of Nova Scotia, violated the firm's NAFTA investor protections.
It may seem odd to pay taxes on coverage that you've already paid for, but this
rule is meant to account for
cases in which you receive a discounted rate by purchasing group life insurance.
If you're not a Christian, you probably would not want to join unless you're joining for the wrong reasons
in which case, there would need to be
rules set
in place preventing certain people from holding a leadership role.
Anyway this isn't a relgious issue at all, to make it into a relgious issue is a bit silly unless what they are claiming is that this
rule ONLY applies to religious groups
in which case that is clear discrimination on the part of the University.
She then appealed her
case to the Washington Supreme Court,
which ruled 9 — 0 against her
in February 2017.
That's how I read the Supreme Court's decision not to hear
cases in which lower courts
ruled that marriage laws
in various states that recognize unions only of a man and a woman are unconstitutional.
According to the standards of procedural justice,
which calls for treating similar
cases in a similar fashion, nations should not be selective
in implementing trade
rules but should simply let mutually agreed - upon processes and procedures run their course.
There was the Superior Court judge
in Ontario who
ruled that Ottawa had «failed
in their duty of care to indigenous peoples»
in one
case pertaining to the Sixties Scoop
which hardly seems sufficient language for the intergenerational pain that was inflicted but I'm glad for it.
The Supreme Court has become a cause célèbre among evangelicals since the 1973
ruling in the
case of Roe v. Wade (
which effectively legalized abortion
in America).
The resulting court
case (Hudnut v. the American Booksellers Association) went as far as the U.S. Court of Appeals,
which ruled in favor of the booksellers.
On April 22, 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a
ruling in the
case of Interstate Circuit v. Dallas,
which revolved around the film Viva Maria.
It is not possible to lay down any general
rule which can be applied as the fixed standard
in all
cases of this nature.
However, it is certainly very much to be desired that a sober thinker would for once explain how far this purely logical process,
which recalls the grammatical
rule that two negatives make an affirmative, and the mathematical
rule that two minuses are a plus — how far, I say, this logical process is valid
in the world of reality,
in the world of qualities; whether after all the qualities are not subject to a different dialectic; whether
in this
case «transition» does not play a different rôle.
The exception to the
rule, the situation, is granted
in the
case of the necessita, the action required
which can not be made on the basis of the law of the being.
Neville there were times when dominionism worked for Israel
which were the exceptions rather than the
rule but generally it did nt sadly because of the wickedness of peoples hearts.Power tends to corrupt people ie
in the
case of nebbucanezzar especially when they succeed.Like you i think Gods people have more impact by just letting Christ work through them could be me but i find politics tends to involve power money and compromise.Regardless of what political state we find ourselves Gods sovereign and his will be done on earth as it is
in heaven.My focus is real simple just follow Jesus with all my heart mind soul and strength and love others as myself and that is just following Jesus daily and trusting him
in everything.regards brentnz
In neither case does it reflect a disrespectful view of divine law (which both the Old and the New Testament see as grounded in divine grace), but rather it refers to what is bound to happen to the law when we start «handling» it and using it to establish our own righteousness rather than letting the rule and righteousness of God dwell and become embodied in our mids
In neither
case does it reflect a disrespectful view of divine law (
which both the Old and the New Testament see as grounded
in divine grace), but rather it refers to what is bound to happen to the law when we start «handling» it and using it to establish our own righteousness rather than letting the rule and righteousness of God dwell and become embodied in our mids
in divine grace), but rather it refers to what is bound to happen to the law when we start «handling» it and using it to establish our own righteousness rather than letting the
rule and righteousness of God dwell and become embodied
in our mids
in our midst.
The Supreme Court gave a boost to their conviction that secularism is a genuine competing faith
in the
ruling in the 1961 Torcaso
case,
in which «Secular Humanism» was identified as a religion, and
in Justice Potter Stewart's dissent
in the 1963 Schempp
case,
which referred to a refusal to permit religious exercises
in schools as not «the realization of state neutrality, but rather as the establishment of a religion of secularism.»
In my
case my earliest and continuing favorite is Huckleberry Finn from
which I first learned that truth and personal integrity are often beyond the
rules of society.
Moreover,
cases often turn on minute details,
which makes the law unpredictable; critics refer to a «three plastic reindeer
rule,» under
which the presence of a sufficient number of secular decorations
in close proximity to a crèche render it constitutional.
For
in this
case Christians did not take the land by might of arms but by persuasion, and
ruled not as foreign conquerors but as inhabitants and natives, harvesting the fruit of earlier centuries during
which the bulk of the local population gradually adopted the new religion as its own.
In which case the
rule book should be changed, like the IFR.
Let's consider something: if
in the atheist existential
case we can admit that
in order to achieve outcomes
which we desire we often have to pay a steep price for the sake of achieving what we intend to achieve, why must this be
ruled out
in the
case of God?
Just because conduct is not determined by unified intelligible basic principles, but is regulated by the formal authority of the Law, the task of the scribe is to «make a fence around the Torah,» that is, by endless acute deductions from Scripture to find
rules for
cases not foreseen
in the Law,
which nevertheless confront men
in their present life.
Also,
in case anyone is interested, I recently found this web page
which shows various SC
rulings dealing with religion and education — often regarding the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment:
Given a commitment to utilitarian calculation as the basic decision procedure, one can not
rule out the possibility that circumstances might arise
which would justify unequal treatment
in a particular
case.
This can also by all means be regarded as ensuing
in the interest of a more inclusive analysis of the human being, as an opportunity for the theoretical comprehension of the so - called «primitive» experiences
which even human beings have — and indeed to a large extent
in every
case — experiences
which, as a
rule, reach the level of consciousness only, for example,
in a dull bodily sensation,
in the feeling of various degrees of general psychophysical «presence,» etc..