On the same day the Center filed comments against the proposed standards, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied an administration request to revisit the court's November 2007
ruling in our case against the Department of Transportation, once again affirming that fuel economy standards must be set at the maximum feasible level to save oil, reduce greenhouse gas pollution and protect consumers.
Not exact matches
In fact, in 2014 when the last major cases involving such infringements were decided, the court ruled unanimously against patent troll
In fact,
in 2014 when the last major cases involving such infringements were decided, the court ruled unanimously against patent troll
in 2014 when the last major
cases involving such infringements were decided, the court
ruled unanimously
against patent trolls.
The strongly worded
ruling from Judge Leon was
in a
case brought
against the governors of the Federal Reserve by a group of plaintiffs including the National Association of Convenience Stores, the National Retail Federation, the Food Marketing Institute, Miller Oil Co., Boscov's Department Store and the National Restaurant Association.
US Supreme Court justices appeared unsure on Tuesday whether to
rule against online TV startup Aereo
in a major copyright
case.
In two cases against the U.S. Postal Service in 2011, the EEOC ruled that gender stereotyping claims are indeed sex - discrimination claim
In two
cases against the U.S. Postal Service
in 2011, the EEOC ruled that gender stereotyping claims are indeed sex - discrimination claim
in 2011, the EEOC
ruled that gender stereotyping claims are indeed sex - discrimination claims.
A
ruling against Aereo would conflict with its earlier decision
in the Cablevision
case, the majority said.
While Gorsuch has come down
against excessive force
in some
cases, including that of the 13 - year - old, he has
ruled several times
in favor of police.
District Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn agreed June 27 to allow the three lawsuits
against DOL's
rule that are pending
in the state to be consolidated, and both parties filed a motion asking that the judge render a decision
in the
case as soon as October.
When the International Trade Court
ruled in favor of plaintiffs Suniva and SolarWorld
in their
case against cheap Chinese solar module and cell imports, reactions were polarized: the U.S. solar industry was outraged — as it had been for most of the duration of the court investigation — and investors, apparently, were extremely upbeat for the future of this same outraged industry, sending solar stocks sky - high.
An Ontario Court of Appeal justice has warned
against «summary judgment at all costs»
in her dissent of a
ruling on the application of the doctrine of emergency
in a personal injury
case.
The Department of Justice defended the
rule when it filed papers
in July
in a Washington district court arguing
against the
case filed by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
On October 13, 2017, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed a
case brought by the blockchain firm R3 Holdco
against Ripple Labs, another company active
in the space,
ruling that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the lawsuit.
The first oral arguments
in the string of lawsuits filed
against DOL's fiduciary
rule were heard on Aug. 25 by Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia,
in the
case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
Just two days after being granted a preliminary injunction
in its
case against Patrick McDonnell and Coin Drop Markets, the CFTC used that
ruling to give notice of supplemental authority
in another cryptocurrency - related
case.
A state judge
in Massachusetts
ruled Wednesday that the Massachusetts Attorney General can move forward with a potentially gigantic data breach
case against the credit reporting firm Equifax.
The federal judge overseeing the
case in Texas
against the Department of Labor's fiduciary
rule on Wednesday denied considering all but two of the eight amicus briefs filed
in the court, allowing only the briefs filed by the Financial Planning Coalition and the American Association for Justice.
Also March 20, 2018: New York state Judge Jennifer Schecter
rules against Trump's lawyers» motion to dismiss the defamation
case by Summer Zervos, citing the Supreme Court's
ruling in Clinton v. Jones that presidents are not immune from civil suits.
Little progress has been made, although the WTO did
rule against China
in the
case and export restrictions were lifted
in 2015.
Plaintiffs
in the court
case that threw out the Department of Labor's fiduciary
rule declared «complete victory»
against the
rule and said the way is now clear for the Securities and Exchange Commission to create a new standard that would apply across financial disciplines.
In a guest article, Robert E. Plaze, a partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, analyzes Gallagher's statement; addresses the more interesting
case of the two settlements Gallagher voted
against; and discusses Gallagher's criticisms of
Rule 206 (4)-7.
The Senate voted Tuesday night to kill a controversial
rule that would have allowed Americans to file class - action suits
against banks instead of being forced
in many
cases into private arbitration.
A federal judge has
ruled in favor of an anonymous customer of the bitcoin exchange Coinbase
against the Internal Revenue Service, permitting the unnamed bitcoiner to challenge the agency's summons and proceed with their
case anonymously.
She then appealed her
case to the Washington Supreme Court, which
ruled 9 — 0
against her
in February 2017.
In difficult
cases one asks not (for instance) whether the
rule against murder has exceptions but whether this kind of
case counts as murder - a question of analogical judgment.
In a report on the first three hundred days of Modi's
rule, 43 deaths were documented and, overall, 600
cases of persecution, 149
against Christians, most of the rest
against Muslims, and some
against Jews and Parsis.
In those cases the court deferred to the judgment of the Air Force that the free - exercise claim of a Jewish officer who wore his yarmulke on duty could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of correctional authorities that the free - exercise claim of a Black Muslim to attend Friday afternoon religious services could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service that building a logging road through a national forest was necessary despite the damage to religious practices of Native American tribes in that area; it deferred to the Internal Revenue Service's ruling that Bob Jones University was not entitled to tax exemption because of its religiously motivated rule against interracial dating and marriage on campus; it deferred to the judgment of the secretary of labor that a religious community must pay its members the minimum wage for work they performed in the group's business although the members said they had religious objections to being paid for their wor
In those
cases the court deferred to the judgment of the Air Force that the free - exercise claim of a Jewish officer who wore his yarmulke on duty could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of correctional authorities that the free - exercise claim of a Black Muslim to attend Friday afternoon religious services could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service that building a logging road through a national forest was necessary despite the damage to religious practices of Native American tribes
in that area; it deferred to the Internal Revenue Service's ruling that Bob Jones University was not entitled to tax exemption because of its religiously motivated rule against interracial dating and marriage on campus; it deferred to the judgment of the secretary of labor that a religious community must pay its members the minimum wage for work they performed in the group's business although the members said they had religious objections to being paid for their wor
in that area; it deferred to the Internal Revenue Service's
ruling that Bob Jones University was not entitled to tax exemption because of its religiously motivated
rule against interracial dating and marriage on campus; it deferred to the judgment of the secretary of labor that a religious community must pay its members the minimum wage for work they performed
in the group's business although the members said they had religious objections to being paid for their wor
in the group's business although the members said they had religious objections to being paid for their work.
In recent years the International Court of Justice — the World Court — has ruled against the U.S. in human rights cases brought by Nicaragua and Paragua
In recent years the International Court of Justice — the World Court — has
ruled against the U.S.
in human rights cases brought by Nicaragua and Paragua
in human rights
cases brought by Nicaragua and Paraguay.
A 2015
case in Washington
ruled against pharmacists who refused to carry the drugs; however, state law allows that «an individual pharmacist with religious objections may refuse to fill the prescription if another pharmacist working for the pharmacy does so.»
In multiple
cases, courts have
ruled that such discrimination
against orthodox persons and organisations is illegal but, as French notes, that doesn't stop the academic thought patrol from trying again and again.
Following the denial of USC's appeal of the NCAA
ruling in the SC football program's illegal benefits
case, the BCS has taken an unprecedented strike
against a sanctioned team and moved to formally strip the Trojans of their 2004 college football national championship title.
A New Jersey Superior Court Judge
ruled Thursday that fraud claims
against New York Giants quarterback Eli Manning
in a memorabilia civil
case will still go to trial.
Judge Claudia Wilken, who presided over the O'Bannon
case, issued an order declaring that the NCAA and some of the conferences will have to defend the
rules against players receiving more than tuition, room and board (and now a cost - of - attendance stipend)
in open court
in a
case brought by a plaintiff group that includes former Clemson cornerback Martin Jenkins and former Wisconsin forward Nigel Hayes.
«
In the Champions League, especially in the knockout rounds, sometimes one goal or the away goals ruling can decide ties, like with us against Monaco, where that was the cas
In the Champions League, especially
in the knockout rounds, sometimes one goal or the away goals ruling can decide ties, like with us against Monaco, where that was the cas
in the knockout rounds, sometimes one goal or the away goals
ruling can decide ties, like with us
against Monaco, where that was the
case.
That wasn't the
case in Week 1 when Gronkowski was
ruled out shortly before New England's season opener
against Arizona.
Sara Bennett — Co-author of The
Case Against Homework started stophomework.com Was successful
in changing
rules at her kid's schools
Before
ruling against joint custody, the court may also consider hospital and police records (
in cases of abuse or where allegations of abuse are present) as well as character witnesses.
For example,
in case number 87 C 10746, Gutzmacher v. Public Building Commission,
in U.S. District Court for the Northern District ofIllinois, Eastern Division, Senior Federal District Judge James B. Parson
ruled on Dec. 4, 1989 that the Public Building Commission was enjoined from discriminating
against all forms of religious expression and ordered the Public Building Commission to permit Gutzmacher to erect a nativity scene display during the Christmas season,» added Scholten.
In April, a U.S. District Court judge ruled on a case against the Park District that had been brought by an Edgewater couple who wanted to donate a brick as part of a fundraising effort for new playground equipment in Senn Par
In April, a U.S. District Court judge
ruled on a
case against the Park District that had been brought by an Edgewater couple who wanted to donate a brick as part of a fundraising effort for new playground equipment
in Senn Par
in Senn Park.
A
rule banning specifically Muslim religious clothing may constitute direct discrimination
against Muslims, but
in these two
cases the
rules more generally banned visible religious clothing,
in pursuit of a policy of neutrality, so it was found that direct discrimination had not occurred.
Client Earth previously won a
case against Government
in the Supreme Court last year, which
ruled that it must come up with plans to combat air pollution «as soon as possible».
For instance, Justice Jones Dotse is reported to be the author of this phrase «create, loot and share»
in reference to a certain
case before the court during the ndc era which subsequently became a vile political slogan for the NPP prior to the 2012 elections
against the then
ruling NDC government.
In a celebrated case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»
In a celebrated
case brought by a group of civil libertarians to the U.S. Supreme Court
in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact»
in 1942, Chief Justice Robert Jackson,
against the strong argument of civil libertarians on the issues of «interrogation without the due process of law» and prolonged detention of suspects, gave his famous
ruling that the United States «Constitution is not a suicide pact».
The Learned Hand
rule on such questions of tort would suggest, for example, that producers and other parties ought to take precautions
against harming others
in any
cases where the cost of the precaution is less than the expected cost of the damage: that is, the cost of the damage, discounted by the probability of its occurring.
In a case that could have wide - ranging national significance for gay rights, a federal appeals court in New York ruled that a landmark civil rights law bars employers from discriminating against their workers based on sexual orientatio
In a
case that could have wide - ranging national significance for gay rights, a federal appeals court
in New York ruled that a landmark civil rights law bars employers from discriminating against their workers based on sexual orientatio
in New York
ruled that a landmark civil rights law bars employers from discriminating
against their workers based on sexual orientation.
In a major
ruling, the British Humanist Association (BHA) has won its
case against the Department for Education (DfE) over its refusal to publish a list of all groups proposing to establish Free Schools.
The Kumasi High Court has
ruled in favour of MultiChoice Ghana,
in a
case levelled
against Champion Broadcasting Limited
in 2016.
Staten Island Supreme Court Justice Phillip G. Minardo handed down his decision
in the
case Friday morning,
ruling against Assembly members Ron Castorina Jr. (R - South Shore) and Nicole Malliotakis (R - East Shore / Brooklyn), who filed the
case.
«It is my decision that this court has jurisdiction on the charges filed
against the first defendant
in this
case and the notice of preliminary objection is dismissed,» Justice Solebo
ruled.
A State Supreme Court judge
ruled against the city
in the controversial Broadway Triangle rezoning
case in which a coalition of community groups allege...
A Bronx judge
ruled today that Councilman Fernando Cabrera could stay on the ballot
in his primary challenge
against State Senator Gustavo Rivera, tossing the
case because Mr. Rivera's team failed to properly serve a subpoena to a petition carrier for Mr. Cabrera who allegedly collected fraudulent signatures.