Sentences with phrase «ruling in the case between»

As the nation awaits Supreme Court ruling in the case between Senator Ali Modu Sheriff and Senator Ahmed Makarfi over the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chairmanship...

An appeals court in the US has reversed the ruling in the case between Google and Oracle which was decided in 2012 in favour of the search engine giant, saying that Oracle could copyright parts of the programming language Java.

Not exact matches

The Liberals are unlikely to make any final decision on drug testing until the Supreme Court of Canada rules on its legality in a case between Suncor and workers at its Alberta oil sands operation, said Troy Winters, senior health and safety officer with the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

Second, and even more disturbing, in this case the SEC's rules overstep the boundaries between the federal and state regulatory spheres.

We're building a wall between here and Mexico,» said Trump, who claimed that the Indiana - born US District Judge Gonzalo Curiel faced an «absolute conflict,» in ruling on the billionaire's case.

In that case and a few others when the Holy See bent its rule of limiting itself to generic condemnations, the reason was always that the pope hoped to play a part in brokering a peace between nationIn that case and a few others when the Holy See bent its rule of limiting itself to generic condemnations, the reason was always that the pope hoped to play a part in brokering a peace between nationin brokering a peace between nations.

In each case the model aided the formulation of the equations of the theory and also suggested rules of correspondence between certain theoretical terms and observable variables.

But there have been many historical cases in which rules of correspondence were suggested by analogies between observations.

The rule of thumb when deciding between robotic or conventional case packers is not as true today as in the past, because robots now cost less and are easier to use, creating more options for packagers.

The Miami case is embarrassing, but so is the 2012 Penn State case, the Reggie Bush USC sanctions, the separation of agents from their future clients, the random declarations of ineligibility, the year waiting period between transfers, the regulation of student - athlete endorsements and use of their own likenesses in products, the rules governing recruiting at any level, and a hundred other daily absurdities fostered by the need to keep money out of the hands of those who earn it.

In the last years, EU have faced several cases of countries with judicial independence issues and I am wondering if there is a connection between party in power ideology and judicial independence / rule of law issueIn the last years, EU have faced several cases of countries with judicial independence issues and I am wondering if there is a connection between party in power ideology and judicial independence / rule of law issuein power ideology and judicial independence / rule of law issues.

By the way, the deciders of the case distinguished between a child born to a vassal of King James in a jurisdiction ruled by King James while James was generally obeyed as ruler of that jurisdiction, versus a child born to the same parents in the same jurisdiction before James became the ruler of that jurisdiction.

The Court of Appeals eventually ruled in Soares» favor but even then - Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman noted the case involved a «personal issue back and forth» between Carter and Soares.

Brexit means that UK - EU relations need to be regulated by either negotiated treaty between EU and UK or, in case of failure of the negotiations, a default WTO rules.

Lots of violent cases were recorded in the Ashanti and Brong Ahafo regions, a development that raised fears as to what might happen in the general elections which promises to be keenly contested between the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) and the largest opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP).

As reported by The Real Deal last month, the city's Housing Court rarely rules in favor or tenants, having only done so in 2 percent of cases brought by tenants between 2014 and 2016.

The representative noted that between 2014 to 2016, New York City Housing Court only ruled that harassment occurred in 2 percent (or less) of cases brought by tenants.

However, if the scenario were to play out in which both politicians are found to have broken rules, I suspect that we would see a «gentlemen's agreement» between both Labour and Conservative parties not to make political capital out of either case - whereas if either Mrs Spelman or Mr Brown were found to have breached rules as an isolated news story, there would be calls for sackings, resignations etc..

In this case, Mr Hunter did not distinguish clearly enough between his Parliamentary and party political roles and as a result I conclude that he breached the rules by using the Communications Allowance, albeit largely indirectly, to support his party political or campaigning activities.»

Topics in the Q&A included the source of money for the City's planned pre-K advertising campaign, the City's target number of pre-K applicants, whether Speaker Silver thinks the proposed income tax surcharge should be pursued next year, how the pre-K selection process will work, how the City will cover the approximately $ 40 million annual gap between the estimated cost of pre-K and the amount provided in the state budget, when parents will learn whether their pre-K application has been accepted, how the City will collect data and measure success of the pre-K program, whether the existing pre-K application process will be changed, how the City will use money from the anticipated school bond issue, the mayor's reaction to a 2nd Circuit ruling that City may bar religious groups from renting after - hours space in public schools, the status on a proposed restaurant in Union Square, a tax break included in the state budget that provides millions of dollars to a Bronx condominium project, the «shop & frisk» meeting today between the Rev. Al Sharpton and Police Commissioner Bratton and a pending HPD case against a Brooklyn landlord.

In this case, the comparison between public and private schools was blurred by the fact that half the public schools in the authors» sample were either charter schools or recently reconstituted schools operating under special ruleIn this case, the comparison between public and private schools was blurred by the fact that half the public schools in the authors» sample were either charter schools or recently reconstituted schools operating under special rulein the authors» sample were either charter schools or recently reconstituted schools operating under special rules.

Although the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the lower court's ruling in 1973, the case brought national attention to state school - funding gaps between district haves and have - nots.

[10] This is equivalent to applying the Glazerman rules to the case in which the correlation between the predicted future value added and achievement is essentially zero.

@PatriciaShanahan Thank you for the counterexample, and the good rule of thumb for how to distinguish between the scammer and the legitimate business in such cases.

In our test case we had a 50,000 mile a year flyer needing between 292,00 and 375,000 miles — using the Rule of 7 would have put us at 350,000; pretty close.

One of the most exciting and unique things about the xenosaga series is that you can look foward to seeing different character models with each new game because appearence of the characters change with each game, not because the characters have aged but for other reasons.There is one special thing that xenosaga episode three has that should have been in the other xenosaga games is the swimsuit mode because it allows you to watch movie scenes with the characters in there swimsuits but for some reason not all of the movie scenes in xenosaga 3 can be viewed in swimsuit mode, I guess it would have made the movie less serious or something.My favorite movie scenes in xenosaga are blue testament, white testament, KOSMOS verses Black Testament, any movie with Luis Virgil becaus ehe is my favorite character in the game because he's passionate and i don't think that he is a bad guy since he was able to brek free from being a testament and the only real reasons why he became a testament was because he wanted to be able to visit that old church on miltia and to gain power to prevent death.I also love Luis Virgil and all of the movie scenes that he appear in becaus they are very dramatic.The best thing about the xenosaga series is thst the story is very dee, interesting, and shocking and anyone who has played the game in order from episode one through three will definitely say the same thing.There is no doubt that anyone who has completed episode one and two will be stunned when every secret and mystery is unraveled in episode three.The one thing that I can't seem to under stand is why do some of the characters have to travel back to the earth in the end, will shion and the gang make it back to earth or will there descendants finish the mission and find earth in the end, Chaos and Nephilim told the group that the key to saving humanity lies on earth, what I want to know is what is it and how will it be used to save the universe, Even in the end new mysteries arose and remained unraveled.If there is any one outher who has has the awnswer to any of these questions please let me know when you write you're review or else there has just got to be a xenosaga four on the way, (crying) they just can't leave the story end this way.The only thing that dissapointed me about the game at first was the battle system because on the back of the case of xenosaga three said that the best aspect of the previous battles systems from episode one were combined to form a new battle system, If namco had really done this Xenosaga episode three would have had a better battle system in my opinion because I belive that the best aspect of xenosaga episode one were the special atacks wich are better than the those of episode three and the best aspect of episode three as the break system wich was also better than those of episode three.I think that namco should have given xenosaga episode 3 the battle system of episode 2 combined episode ones style of special attack, but doing this would have probably made the battle system of xenosaga episode three boring because the same old tactics would have to be used in a new game and the battle system most likely would not be as realistic as it is but it would probably be cooler.However the ability to summon all four Erde Kaisers including the new Erde Kasier Sgma my most favorite summon in the world at will and use new Ether and Tech attacks along with the new Counter and Revenge abilities gave xenosaaga episode three more than boost that it needed to have an descent battle systemThe E.S battle system of xenosaga episode 3 is way more better than those of episod one and two though, I must say that Namco really outdid themselves with the E.S battle system of xenosaga episode because the other E.S battle system from the two previos games weren't good, luckily they made up for it with the character battle system.In episode one I never really wanted to use anA.G.W.S, lucky for me they were optional but in episode two sadly it is manatory that you pilot an E.S to progress in the game in Episode three you piloting an E.S is also mandatory to progress in the game but the difference between the three episode is that will be sorry in episode three you will ge glad that you are using an E.S because their battle system is extremely cool.Xenosaga is most definitely one of the besrt RPG games in the world andit is far more better than any final fantasy game that Square Enix has ever made but for some reason it still score lower than Some Final Fantasy and other Sqare Enix games on this site.I bet that if xenosaga was actually named Final Fantasy and had a subtitle it and if it wre made by sqare Enix it would have probably been more famous and it would have scored higher even though it is still the same gameIn the end with every thing being written said and done all i can say is that I feel more at peace now that I have defended this underated game.All I have to say now is that TURN BASED GAMES RULE!

Among the dominant trends in the Post-Painterly Abstraction are Hard - Edged Painters such as Ellsworth Kelly and Frank Stella who explored relationships between tightly ruled shapes and edges, in Stella's case, between the shapes depicted on the surface and the literal shape of the support and Color - Field Painters such as Helen Frankenthaler and Morris Louis, who stained first Magna then water - based acrylic paints into unprimed canvas, exploring tactile and optical aspects of large, vivid fields of pure, open color.

In those cases, 26 months passed between issuance of the first rule and the oral argument, and another four months to decision.

By simple inversion I mean that given by the standard rules of probability for converting PDFs between two parameters, being multiplication by the absolute value of the derivative of the old parameter with respect to the new one, or by 3.7 / S2 in this case, and renormalization.

Therefore at low temperatures and high pressures as is the case in the low atmosphere, the equilibrium between the different quantum states (the proportions must stay constant) is mainly ruled by collisions.

In September 2013, the EPA moved forward on the issues, releasing a report that makes the scientific case for the rule by demonstrating the vital connection between smaller streams and wetlands and downstream waters.

In simple terms, this tells me that the presence of a unit root rules out a deterministic trend and that the correlation between GHG and temperature is, therefore, not statistically robust, thereby raising serious questions regarding the case for causation.

It then proceeded to applied this principle to case before it: «[20] It follows from the foregoing that a body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible, pursuant to a measure adopted by the State, for providing a public service under the control of the State and has for that purpose special powers beyond those which result from the normal rules applicable in relations between individuals is included in any event among the bodies against which the provisions of a directive capable of having direct effect may be relied upon.»

Similarly, in case C - 656 / 11 UK v Council, the CJEU ruled that the same applies to a measure implementing the association agreement between the EU and the Swiss Confederation, since the association agreement extended to the Switzerland the application of the EU legislation concerning coordination of social security systems, putting Switzerland in similar position as an EU Member State.

After restating Becker's rationale, the court set out its conclusions thus: «[18] On the basis of those considerations, the Court has held in a series of cases that unconditional and sufficiently precise provisions of a directive could be relied on against organizations or bodies which were subject to the authority or control of the State or had special powers beyond those which result from the normal rules applicable to relations between individuals.»

The court said in the 2014 case that a lawyer who faces a conflict between two current clients can't avoid current - client conflict rules by dropping one client «like a hot potato.»

This is because the new version of the EEA Agreement established a new procedure to preserve the homogenous interpretation of the agreement through the EFTA Joint Committee monitoring the evolution of the Court of Justice's case law, and a mechanism analogous to the preliminary reference procedure whereby the Court of Justice would be asked to give a ruling on the interpretation of relevant rules in disputes between the Contracting Parties (Articles 105 - 111 of the EEA Agreement).

However, the Court of Justice found at paragraph 24 of Opinion 1/91 that the «interpretation mechanism» whereby the EEA court would have to interpret the rules of the agreement in conformity with the case - law of the Court of Justice would not be sufficient to ensure the legal homogeneity between the EEA states and the EU Member States.

The ruling in this case will place many employees in «the twilight zone,» somewhere between having been fired yet expected to continue working for the same or even a related employer.

The Court of Appeal held that in this case, there was a reasonable apprehension of a conflict between the interests of Reeb and RSA, which precluded the Court from ruling on the merits of the appeal.

In its recent decision in a case between two duelling drug companies, the nation's top court unanimously ruled the doctrine was «unsound.&raquIn its recent decision in a case between two duelling drug companies, the nation's top court unanimously ruled the doctrine was «unsound.&raquin a case between two duelling drug companies, the nation's top court unanimously ruled the doctrine was «unsound.»

In particular, Rule 26 (b)(3) eliminates the distinction between attorney work - product and non-attorney work - product, focusing on whether the materials were prepared in anticipation of litigation or trial.28 Further, Rule 26 (b)(3) preserves work - product protections unless the party seeking discovery has a «substantial need» for the materials in the preparation of the party's case and the party is unable without «undue hardship» to obtain the «substantial equivalent» of the materials by other means.In particular, Rule 26 (b)(3) eliminates the distinction between attorney work - product and non-attorney work - product, focusing on whether the materials were prepared in anticipation of litigation or trial.28 Further, Rule 26 (b)(3) preserves work - product protections unless the party seeking discovery has a «substantial need» for the materials in the preparation of the party's case and the party is unable without «undue hardship» to obtain the «substantial equivalent» of the materials by other means.in anticipation of litigation or trial.28 Further, Rule 26 (b)(3) preserves work - product protections unless the party seeking discovery has a «substantial need» for the materials in the preparation of the party's case and the party is unable without «undue hardship» to obtain the «substantial equivalent» of the materials by other means.in the preparation of the party's case and the party is unable without «undue hardship» to obtain the «substantial equivalent» of the materials by other means.29

A landmark legal ruling has been secured by UK200Group member firm Virtuoso Legal in a case between retail giant Argos and Virtuoso's client, a relatively small US - based software company, Argos Systems Inc..

There are also distinctions between states, but the broad outlines are often generally similar in all states and where they differ it is frequently the case that there are only two to four rules of all in place in all of the states combined with one majority or plurality rule and one to three minority rules.

The author also discusses the blood quantum rule, cultural appropriation, Indigenous use of intellectual property laws, Two - Spirit identities (Indigenous transgender individuals), the landmark Delgamuukw and Tsilhqot» in cases (recognition of Aboriginal title), non-benign myths about Indigenous peoples, the six - volume Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) final report on the residential school system where at least 6,000 Indigenous children died, Canada's Stolen Generations (between 1960 and 1990, 70 - 90 % of Indigenous children in Canada were removed from their homes and placed into non-Indigenous homes), Inuit relocations, the issue of access to safe drinking water for First Nations communities, the five - volume report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, Indigenous lands, education, treaties, and treaty - making.

The case is being closely watched due, in part, to the involvement of the company's corporate bodies in the United States, its Swiss affiliate and because «practitioners are hoping the courts will clarify the interplay between major elements of Canada's transfer pricing rules, as well as the appropriateness of the Canada Revenue Agency's aggressive approach to transfer pricing disputes.»

(1) Regarding the formation and effect of a contract (excluding labor contracts; hereinafter referred to in this Article as «consumer contract») between a consumer (i.e., an individual, excluding those cases where the party acts as a business or for a business) and a business operator (i.e., a juridical person or other corporate association, or an individual in those cases where the party is acting as a business or for a business), even where by choice under Article 7 or variation under Article 9, the applicable law would be a law other than that of the consumer's habitual residence, when the consumer indicates to the business operator his or her intention that a particular mandatory rule from within the law of the consumer's habitual residence should apply, this mandatory rule shall also apply to the matters covered by the rule concerning the consumer contract's formation and effect.

Mr. Tufts is also known for his expertise in obtaining successful results in cases involving the Federal Truth - in - Lending Act (and Regulation Z), the Federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (and Regulation X), the Utah One - Action Rule, the Utah Trust Deed Act, and similar laws that govern the relationships between lender, borrower and guarantor.

In civil cases, I found that (a) there is a small, but apparently statistically significant, difference between how likely each judge is to rule in favour of an appellant, and (b) there is a very noticeable difference in how long each judge takes to render a decisioIn civil cases, I found that (a) there is a small, but apparently statistically significant, difference between how likely each judge is to rule in favour of an appellant, and (b) there is a very noticeable difference in how long each judge takes to render a decisioin favour of an appellant, and (b) there is a very noticeable difference in how long each judge takes to render a decisioin how long each judge takes to render a decision.

The Sunberry ruling demonstrates the need, in many pre-pack cases, to carry out a balancing exercise between the legitimate interests of the landlord on one hand, and the interests of other creditors on the other.