Sentences with phrase «ruling in the case even»

Then again, the current court could make a final ruling in the case even before the court makeup shifts in January as a result of the Nov. 5 elections.

Not exact matches

«This was a meticulously documented indictment, and certainly in the case of one of the individuals I think it opens the door to other matters and it emphasizes why the rule of law is so important, and that even includes the president,» said Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat.

Case in point: In mid-September, three weeks before Morneau tabled his rules, credit reporting agency TransUnion estimated that hundreds of thousands of Canadians carrying variable rate subprime mortgages could be significantly impacted by interest rate increases of even 25 basis pointin point: In mid-September, three weeks before Morneau tabled his rules, credit reporting agency TransUnion estimated that hundreds of thousands of Canadians carrying variable rate subprime mortgages could be significantly impacted by interest rate increases of even 25 basis pointIn mid-September, three weeks before Morneau tabled his rules, credit reporting agency TransUnion estimated that hundreds of thousands of Canadians carrying variable rate subprime mortgages could be significantly impacted by interest rate increases of even 25 basis points.

The rules of asset diversification apply even in the compelling case of tax - free income.

Observed the report: «The context in which the policy was adopted and even the issue of whether a rule or policy has been actually adopted are also important in these cases.»

Yet, the current rules require that much of the cost be written off as an expense when it is incurred, meaning that early years in a product development tend to show very low profits, or in some cases even massive losses, with inflated profits toward the end.

Shareholder proposals under the current SEC rules are not burdensome, and in the vast majority of cases, are not even binding.

Second, and even more disturbing, in this case the SEC's rules overstep the boundaries between the federal and state regulatory spheres.

By the time the case got before the First Circuit, the SEC was in default by over a year even though it had gotten two 270 day periods to complete the rule.

Even in cases where companies do not choose to provide or are barred by FINRA rules from providing noncash compensation awards directly to agents, the report says, «they frequently provide cash or noncash incentives to the third - party marketing organizations that then pass these awards on to the agents.»

Politicians always follow the «look busy» rule: when bad things happen, they have to be seen to be responding, even if there is little likelihood their actions will have any effect. But in this case, Harper was motivated by an additional strategic judgment. Perversely, with his re-election campaign sidetracked by ongoing revelations in the Duffy / Wright case, the Prime Minister actually wants Canadians to worry about the economy. Conservative strategists hope that will undermine voters» willingness to consider an alternative government, playing into the traditional frame that Conservatives have the strongest economic «credentials.»

This was a national test case, because even though the ruling is effective only in Alaska and a precedent only there, it can serve as a model for pro-abortion forces in forty - nine other states.

The court thus ruled that no nonreligious entity - even, as in the case of VHA, a membership organization whose members had raised a conscience objection to performing abortions - possessed the statutory right described in the exempting statute.

That wasn't even Olson's case, but with assists from a federal district court judge who came out as being in a same - sex relationship only after ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state law, Olson and Boies did succeed in disenfranchising millions of Californians on a procedural technicality.

And in most cases, there's a strong argument to be made that the «rules» trapping women are not even in the religious texts!

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

Even the Davidic monarchy, as in the cases of king Solomon and king Ahab, used religious institutions and trappings to justify their arbitrary actions and rules.

This can also by all means be regarded as ensuing in the interest of a more inclusive analysis of the human being, as an opportunity for the theoretical comprehension of the so - called «primitive» experiences which even human beings have — and indeed to a large extent in every case — experiences which, as a rule, reach the level of consciousness only, for example, in a dull bodily sensation, in the feeling of various degrees of general psychophysical «presence,» etc..

While the First Amendment would seem to provide the answer to these objections by limiting majority rule in the case of fundamental freedoms, minority faiths in America know all too well that even constitutional guarantees are not iron - clad.

everything get burned to the ground - City, Real,MU,Bayern,Chelsea - they all find easy ways to go around that stupid UEFA fair play rule and the prices in players, instead of going down go to the sky.They all become more powerful than before instead of getting weak.Home grown players, English players?Just promote some kids from academy just to make the squad number.They don't even stay on the bench - but the rule is obeyed, right?So, Wenger was betting on a dead horse, he got stuck with a mediocre team, full with overpaid mediocre Brit players, youngsters no one heared about (see Sanogo case).

pls do well to go through the rules and watch more games from all over Europe a foul in a counterattacking situation on an opponent who is miles away from goal (in this case not even past the half - line) with one or more players still left to beat is a Yellow Card offense, Never a red card.

In this case, it will be even more important for your kids to know what the rules are when they're at your house.

Justice Ibrahim Buba of the court in his ruling on the defendants» preliminary objection on Monday, held that the engineers «had not made out a case of infringement on their fundamental rights even on the merit of the application,» and dismissed their applications.

The Court of Appeals eventually ruled in Soares» favor but even then - Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman noted the case involved a «personal issue back and forth» between Carter and Soares.

After the ruling on Thursday evening, Trump tweeted in call caps a vow to continue pressing his case for the executive order.

In some cases, agencies have made rulings that even contradict the written law, creating interesting legal questions and damaging to some degree the public trust.

There's the need to reform the state's bail rules to stop the routine incarceration of less affluent people before they've even been tried, and to require more timely sharing of evidence with defense attorneys in criminal cases.

It was fear of this that forced the Government to put up Alexander to go public on their case even while still in negotiations, throwing in concessions to the lowest paid to keep them in the scheme and to divide and rule the unions over any strike action.

«Even persons who were facing criminal prosecution prior to the 2015 presidential elections who are now members of the ruling APC and other members of APC who are overtly known to be involved in known cases of corruption were excluded from the list whilst persons who have never been charged with any crime and who in fact have not held any previous government portfolio including myself were listed as «looters».

«In this case, it will even be the decision of the majority and a losing battle already,» the Speaker ruled.

There's an equally legitimate reason as well for a 2008 state ethics ruling that bans public officials from taking, or even just looking for, free tickets to sporting events in most cases.

With further seat reductions possible if further member states join the European Union, there may be a need to consider whether the rules shaping the redrawing of European election boundaries needs to be revised (to possibly allow for larger constituencies — even a national constituency) or to also consider whether there may be scope for using an alternative set of electoral rules (e.g. a List system) in the specific case of European elections, especially if the option of having one single constituency for the entire State was to be pursued at a later date.

In the Supreme Court ruling on a case that aimed to stop the project, the top Israeli judges noted that during the planning period, «no one raised any claim, on even one occasion, that the planning procedures violated the sanctity of the site.»

«Here, NOAA Fisheries improperly relies on habitat mitigation measures that are neither reasonably specific nor reasonably certain to occur, and in some cases not even identified,» Redden wrote in his ruling.

As a general rule however, intermittent fasting involves cutting calories in whole or in part, either a couple of days a week, every other day, or even daily, as in the case of the scheduled eating regimen I use myself.

Union members may sue their employers in discrimination cases even if their labor contracts contain general language requiring such disputes to be submitted to arbitration, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week.

A ruling in favor of the Friedrichs plaintiffs — or plaintiffs in future cases like it — would mean less money to support members in all states, even those that are not directly affected by the ruling.

Governors as diverse as George Pataki of New York, Roy Barnes of Georgia, and Gray Davis of California have led the push to strengthen certification requirements, to design innovative recruitment incentives, and even, at least in Barnes» case, to loosen tenure rules.

Second, even in the many cases where courts have sided with the plaintiffs and demanded financing reforms, the courts have typically ruled that individual local districts are free to raise and spend above the level they deem «adequate.»

A veteran lawmaker with close ties to the California Teachers Association, Torlakson has been careful in his public comments about the Vergara case and is likely to become even more as the ruling's high profile continues to elevate.

So even in the cases of not having the strictest rules, the very design of disciplinary cultures do not allow for the kind of changes in power dynamics, gradually adding elements of equalization and greater autonomy.

At first it reminded me of a Twilight Zone episode where people who have broken the rules (in that case just by being rude, selfish and unkind) were shunned to the point that others around them pretended they couldn't even see them.

It's true that Android is open source software, but it's also the case that if you manufacture handsets and you'd like to run it as your operating system, there are rules (and now, even more than there were in the past).

THIS FACT, BEING ABSOLUTELY contrary to life's rules, provoked enormous and, in the circumstances, perfectly justifiable anxiety in people's minds, for we have only to consider that in the entire forty volumes of universal history there is no mention, not even one exemplary case, of such a phenomenon ever having occurred, for a whole day to go by, with its generous allowance of twenty - four hours, diurnal and nocturnal, matutinal and vespertine, without one death from an illness, a fatal fall, or a successful suicide, not one, not a single one.

1) They're gorgeous photos and the artist deserves a shout out even though they made it free to use, and 2) just in case the rules ever change, to cover my ass.

In most cases this will not present a problem because the rules for Roth IRAs allow you to withdraw your basistax - free even when you take a nonqualified distribution.

BTW, just in case there's confusion, even when the superficial loss rule is triggered, your capital loss is NOT LOST.

Keep in mind that the 4 percent rule — or 3.5 percent rule, in this case — assumes an even mix of stocks and bonds.

But in this case there are two beneficiaries and even that rule would not be applied.

In the case of the Roth IRA, withdrawals may even be tax - free provided certain minimum rules discussed later are met.