Sentences with phrase «ruling of the court below»

But none of them seems to afford any material support for the challenged ruling of the court below.

The Court upheld the ruling of the courts below that simply because a country has not signed the Convention should not automatically bar relocation to that country.

Not exact matches

Cancelling the program would come with costs of its own: Some 250,00 Essential Plan members are legally present immigrants at or below the poverty line who are entitled to health coverage under state court rulings.

Under the rules, parties are not allowed to approach the appellate court, except under the special circumstance that the record of proceedings at the court below had been compiled and transmitted by its registry.

The case was referred to the European Court of Justice, which ruled in 2014 that national courts can and should ensure that governments act to get air pollution below legal limits «as soon as possible».

Some of the quotes below, all of which were taken directly from Justice Kennedy's written opinion, reflect the Supreme Court's response to the lower court ruling, not to the original complCourt's response to the lower court ruling, not to the original complcourt ruling, not to the original complaint.

Listed below with links are many of the court rulings and major filings by both sides:

More below the fold.The court's ruling was 5 - 4 in favor of the Navy who justices said needed to conduct realistic exercises to respond to enemy submarines.

Most, although not all, of his rulings that favored employers were in agreement with the court or agency below.»

Courts below ruled in favour of Smith up until the Supreme Court decision, R (on the application of Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence and another [2010] UKSC 29.

More than 100 judicial rulings have relied on Wikipedia, beginning in 2004, including 13 from circuit courts of appeal, one step below the Supreme Court.

In the High Court (subject to any specific rules: as yet there are none) and in the Family Court, applications to set aside must be by way of appeal and subject to the fresh action point in Gohill (see below).

The scheme for prosecution appeals under s 58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is that proceedings in the court below stand adjourned pending the hearing of the appeal, and the ruling is to have no effect pending the outcome of the appeal.

Below are some of the issues raised by Clinton's departure from the race, as well as an analysis of how yesterday's Supreme Court ruling recognizing the right of Guantanamo detainees to avail themselves of habeas corpus procedures is impacting the campaign message of the remaining two candidates.

«The rules could have provided that on appeal the normal rules as to costs should prevail, but part 27.14 (2) applies in terms to costs relating to an appeal; an appellate court should therefore be wary of ordering costs on appeal to be paid if they were not ordered below, unless circumstances on appeal are truly different.»

In the days following the decision, Robert and Elin gave the interviews linked below to explain the significance of the Court's ruling overturning the approvals of the Northern Gateway Pipeline Project.

The second section directs the Supreme Court of Texas to adopt rules to promote the resolution of civil actions in which the amount in controversy is below $ 100,000.

In the present case, it is common ground, that the amount of the public contract at issue in the main proceedings amounts to EUR 85,000, which is considerably below the thresholds for application laid down in Article 4 of Directive 2014/24... On the other hand, in its reference for a preliminary ruling, the referring court has not provided any information enabling the Court to... demonstrate the existence of a certain cross-border interest... In those circumstances, the Court finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis adcourt has not provided any information enabling the Court to... demonstrate the existence of a certain cross-border interest... In those circumstances, the Court finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis adCourt to... demonstrate the existence of a certain cross-border interest... In those circumstances, the Court finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis adCourt finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis added).

When answering that question, we consider the five Florida appellate court decisions below that ruled, as a matter of law, on the issue of whether or not a jury's award of pain and suffering damages were inadequate.

Matters of practice and procedure in the court below must be governed by its Rules, and those Rules must be duly enacted under the Court Rules of Practicecourt below must be governed by its Rules, and those Rules must be duly enacted under the Court Rules of PracticeCourt Rules of Practice Act.

The Court itself can only change and innovate to a degree (mainly administratively, below the level of the Statute and the Rule of Procedure and Evidence).

Furthermore, there is possibly a hint that she, as the Divisional Court below her did, may seek to approach the Article 50 case as very much a question of statutory interpretation — «rules of statutory interpretation which govern the way in which we read legislation and enable us to safeguard fundamental rights and the rule law.»

The courts below were right to apply the reasonableness standard: when an arbitrator interprets his or her enabling legislation to determine whether a dispute is arbitrable, applying the reasonableness standard undermines neither the rule of law nor the other constitutional bases of judicial review.

Except in cases of contempt of court and in leapfrog appeals, an application for permission to appeal must be filed «within 28 days from the date of the order or decision of the court below»: rule 11.

Appeal court rules against London Taxi Company, which claimed exclusive right to shape of its cars in order to thwart rival firm Please click on the links below to read... Read more →

A very interesting illustration of the principle in my tweet, below, came in the bank overdraft case where the Supreme Court ruled, according to the law governing the Office of Fair Trading, that the OFT could not look into the fairness of bank overdraft charges.

Here's a plain English explanation of the decision (embedded below), in which the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that Aereo's technology is legal, and why it's so significant for the TV industry.

If a court is satisfied that the required conditions (see Rules below) are met, the court will grant the decree of dissolution, dissolving the civil partnership.

In two of the PCD cases below, the courts examined the disclosure rules governing real estate transactions in their respective states.