When negotiating a divorce settlement in 2019 or later, the new tax
rule on alimony and spousal maintenance can be factored into the settlement by reducing the amount of alimony or spousal maintenance the paying spouse must send to compensate for the loss of the prior tax deduction.
Not exact matches
Canada Supreme Court decision
on cross-border beer run could rewrite trade
rules, Globe and Mail Feds order budget review of Gordie Howe bridge over cost concerns, documents show, Toronto Star Ex-wife wins one of largest
alimony judgments in Quebec history, Ottawa Citizen
After the family court issued a final order awarding her $ 500.00 per month in permanent periodic
alimony, Wife filed a motion pursuant to
Rule 59 (e), SCRCP, requesting the family court reconsider its decision to not award her attorney's fees and credit her the payments she made
on the second mortgage.
For a married couple with assets
on reserve, a diligent judge would have to apply the Divorce Act for
alimony and child support, provincial family law relations statute to moveable (personal) property only, possibly the FHRMIRA to immoveable (real) property, or else the local land code if the community is under the First Nations Land Management Act or self - government agreement (e.g., Westbank in BC) or its own matrimonial property law if it adopts one under the FHRMIRA and displaces the statute's default
rules.
On November 3, 2010, Quebec's Court of Appeal
ruled that the province's Civil Code does indeed discriminate against common - law spouses by denying them the same recourse to
alimony as those who are married.
When these allegations are accompanied by substantial corroborating evidence, they can have significant impacts
on custody and
alimony rulings.
In determining the amount and duration of the final spousal support or
alimony pendente lite award, the trier of fact shall consider the factors in
Rule 1910.16 - 5 and shall make findings of fact
on the record or in writing.
On May 31, 2000, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled on a request for a change in spousal support (alimony) in the case of Robert B. Crews vs. Barbara D. Crews, by stating that the parties must go back and identify the marital standard of living at the time of the divorc
On May 31, 2000, the New Jersey Supreme Court
ruled on a request for a change in spousal support (alimony) in the case of Robert B. Crews vs. Barbara D. Crews, by stating that the parties must go back and identify the marital standard of living at the time of the divorc
on a request for a change in spousal support (
alimony) in the case of Robert B. Crews vs. Barbara D. Crews, by stating that the parties must go back and identify the marital standard of living at the time of the divorce.
Florida requires different petitions if you have children, if you don't have children but have marital assets, or have no children or property but want the court to
rule on other issues, such as
alimony.
U.S. Tax Court
Alimony Decisions: Five Cases You Should Know (10/14/16) This article summarizes five U.S. Tax Court cases in which the Court ruled against the taxpayer on issues involving deductible a
Alimony Decisions: Five Cases You Should Know (10/14/16) This article summarizes five U.S. Tax Court cases in which the Court
ruled against the taxpayer
on issues involving deductible
alimonyalimony.
New Jersey Court
Rule 5:3 - 7 (a) Additional Remedies
on Violation of Orders Relating To Parenting Time,
Alimony, Support or Domestic Violence Restraining Orders