Not exact matches
On January 26, 2016, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
ruled the Canadian government discriminates against First Nations
children by inequitably funding
child welfare services and by failing to fully implement Jordan's Principle.
In a landmark
ruling released
on January 26, 2016, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal found that the Canadian government is racially discriminating against 163,000 First Nations
children and their families by providing flawed and inequitable
child welfare services («FNCFS Program») and failing to implement Jordan's Principle to ensure equitable access to government services available to other
children.
If one parent has sole custody, the other parent can have visitation rights, whereby that parent has unsupervised or supervised time with the
child, depending
on the court
ruling, but doesn't have implied rights to make important decisions concerning the
child's
welfare, including medical treatment.
The primer provides background
on Live Scan, differing state
rules for accessing the technology, and other key considerations for
child welfare agencies.
[FN9] The paternal preference was based
on the English common law
rule recognizing the father's right to his
children's services (the «fruits of their labor») in return * 770 for his obligation to provide for their
welfare.