In light of the recent California Supreme court «Vergara»
ruling on teacher tenure, this win for Torlakson is even more significant.
Taking On Teacher Tenure Backfires California
Ruling on Teacher Tenure Is Not Whole Picture New York Times op - ed by JESSE ROTHSTEIN, associate professor of public policy and economics at the University of California, Berkeley
Even before a California court
ruling on teacher tenure rocked the education world last week, a group of Buffalo parents were talking about a similar lawsuit.
On trial: California's
rules on teacher tenure and dismissal.
Not exact matches
He said Tuesday that he needed to do further research
on a court
ruling in California that struck down
teacher tenure laws there, but he was cautiously supportive.
Cuomo has suggested $ 1.1 billion in additional education spending — but only if lawmakers agree to implement tougher
tenure rules,
teacher evaluations more reliant
on student test performance and the authorization of more charter schools.
First, the argument for eliminating
tenure: As Judge Rolf M. Treu of Los Angeles Superior Court
ruled on Tuesday, any benefit that
tenure provides to
teachers is far outweighed by its costs to children and society by keeping grossly ineffective instructors in the classroom.
They are responsible for everything from
teacher - certification, seat - time, and graduation requirements to
rules on facilities, transportation, and
tenure.
They defend near - lifetime employment in the form of
tenure and weak
rules on evaluating
teachers and principals that help keep Epps and other so - called educators in their jobs.
The full implementation of Judge Treu's striking down five laws that set
rules for
teacher dismissal, seniority rights and
tenure will likely not take effect for years — or not at all if the state wins
on appeal.
In a landmark
ruling, a Los Angeles superior court judge
on Tuesday struck down key elements of California's
teacher tenure statutes after finding that the near inability to fire ineffective
teachers disproportionately hurts poor and minority students.
In addition, John E. Deasy, the superintendent of the Los Angeles Unified School District and «a staunch opponent of
tenure rules and «last in, first out» seniority for
teachers,» testified
on the side of the plaintiffs, while also noting, however, that «good administrators don't grant due process rights to ineffective
teachers.»
After all, the concerns that handed former governor Arnold Schwarzeneggar's first major defeat — the slew of propositions that would have addressed pension reform, budget reform,
teacher tenure rules and other issues that would have kept our state
on an even economic keel — were thrown asunder by the public sector unions who now OWN this state.
Because Judge Rolf Treu has placed a stay
on his Vergara
ruling pending the outcome of the
teachers unions» appeal, the
tenure, seniority and dismissal statutes are still alive and well in California.
Teacher tenure laws were
ruled unconstitutional Tuesday by a California Supreme Court judge in the case Vergara v. California, which could have far - reaching effects
on education, reports Mel Robbins of CNN.
He went
on to say that he believes the
tenure rules allow for «grossly ineffective
teachers» to remain in the classroom.
Since this
ruling, similar litigation
on teacher tenure has been filed in 2016 in the states of New York and Minnesota.
The California Court of Appeal
on Thursday overturned a lower court
ruling that had challenged
teacher tenure and declared school employment laws unconstitutional.
The California Supreme Court's decision
on whether to take up Vergara v. California, a landmark
ruling that challenged
teacher tenure and declared some school employment laws unconstitutional, could come as early as this afternoon.
Ruling in Vergara v. California, Treu struck down five decades - old California laws governing
teacher tenure and other job protections
on the grounds that they violate the state's constitution.
But what is truly a shame is that L.A.'s union
rules oblige
teachers to serve only two years
on probation before being granted
tenure, the practical equivalent of lifetime employment.
The lawsuit also asks for a
ruling that would require Denver Public Schools to reinstate effective
tenured teachers who were placed
on unpaid leave and grant them back pay.
On Tuesday, the judge in that case tossed out
tenure protection
rules saying
tenure protects
teachers at the expense of students.
Citing the constitutional rights of its public school student plaintiffs, the suit seeks to overturn state laws that schedule
tenure consideration after two years of teaching, dictate the use of seniority when budget cuts force layoffs, and impose due process
rules on teachers» terminations.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction candidate Marshall Tuck this week launched a petition calling
on his opponent, incumbent Superintendent Tom Torlakson, not to appeal a lawsuit
ruling that struck down statutes giving California
teachers firing protections and rights to
tenure and seniority.
According to the fact sheet posted
on the website of an organization supporting the lawsuit, Students Matter, a favorable
ruling would fundamentally change policies with respect to
teacher tenure, dismissals, seniority, and evaluations, all areas where union work -
rules have prevented effective management of public schools.
Judge Treu
ruled in favor of the plaintiffs
on every issue, removing five statutes concerning
tenure, seniority and
teacher dismissal
rules from the state's constitution, adding, «The evidence is compelling.
The impact
on students of grossly ineffective
teachers and current
tenure rules «shocks the conscience,» the judge concluded.