Not exact matches
Last week the Court of Appeal,
ruling in two conjoined cases on disciplinary proceedings brought
against solicitors, Wingate v SRA; SRA v Malins [2018] EWCA Civ 366, overturned Mr Justice Mostyn's
ruling that integrity and honesty are conceptually the same thing.
Justice Lauwer declined to make a finding of negligence
against the
solicitor,
ruling instead that the plaintiff's action was statute barred.
The
ruling follows a Law Society court action to secure an injunction
against the «
Solicitors from Hell» website to protect its members and the public, on the grounds the site was not a credible source of reliable information about s
Solicitors from Hell» website to protect its members and the public, on the grounds the site was not a credible source of reliable information about
solicitorssolicitors.
In a case brought by the
Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), the partners of Clyde and Co solicitors admitted they allowed a client account to be used as a banking facility, acting against SRA accounting rules and in breach of existing obligations under the then - current money laundering regulatio
Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), the partners of Clyde and Co
solicitors admitted they allowed a client account to be used as a banking facility, acting against SRA accounting rules and in breach of existing obligations under the then - current money laundering regulatio
solicitors admitted they allowed a client account to be used as a banking facility, acting
against SRA accounting
rules and in breach of existing obligations under the then - current money laundering regulations (2007).
The Court of Appeal set aside1 a trial court order awarding costs to the Township of Russell
against a
solicitor personally, pursuant to
Rule 57.07 of the
Rules of Civil Procedure.
Strathy, J.
ruled that a trial would be necessary to determine whether the claim was in fact statute barred, noting that even a «sophisticated taxpayer» could be found at trial to not know that damage had occurred and that a legal proceeding
against the
solicitors would be an appropriate remedy, especially while the
solicitors continued to advise that the CRA was wrong.
In a
ruling on remedy reported as R v Rudolph, 2017 NSSC 334 Justice Denise Boudreau summarized her preceding decision on violations of
solicitor - client privilege, and the right to be secure
against unreasonable search and seizure, at para. 5:
According to a statement by Hailsham Chambers, whose Michael Pooles QC and Imran Benson acted for the respondent firm of
solicitors, the
ruling «draws residential conveyancing
solicitors closer than ever before into the position of effectively guaranteeing their clients
against the possibility of fraud by third parties.
Rule 4 (3)(d): The requirement that you are not a party to any criminal or civil proceedings that may lead to disciplinary proceedings being taken
against you as a
solicitor or foreign lawyer in Singapore or elsewhere
From 1 November 2005 a new regime came into place with the idea that unnecessary regulation would be taken away and courts should not be imposing draconian sanctions
against solicitors where only a technical breach of the
rules occurred.
Perhaps a stronger sanction, or any sanction at all,
against those
solicitors w ho fail to follow the golden
rule in the most obvious cases, might result in fewer cases getting to court.
Consumers, State authorities and the FCC may bring actions
against telephone
solicitors for violations of the Act or its
Rules.