Sentences with phrase «rulings of particular judges»

Not exact matches

The author explains that it misses the message of the Bible to pick and choose particular rules or laws, and judge or punish anyone for violating them.

In three days of testimony, Mr. Souter, currently a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, gave little indication of how he would rule on particular school - related issues.

Rather, judges are to look to the modern rule (the language, the various elements of context, the intention, and purpose) to see which particular interpretation conforms to the schematic policy behind the legislation.

In denying the plaintiff's request for a new trial, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that instructions incorporating a legal analysis on the shifting burdens of proof in employment discriminbation cases established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973 is appropriate when a trial court judge «translate [s] it into everyday parlance and fit [s] it to the facts and circumstancews of a particular case.»

In her own remarks, McLachlin called Canada «a country that respects the rule of law, and of openness, in which a young woman of no particular note could become a lawyer and a judge and a chief justice.»

The more informed a judge can become about the nuances of a particular area of the law before issuing a ruling, the more likely it is that the court will issue the best possible ruling in the case.

Judges should be encouraged to give provisional views on the merits of particular issues, if done openly, with the consent of the parties and (save where a ruling is being made) on the express basis that the view expressed is provisional.

Also, Courts Administrator Kevin McCormac said it remains in the discretion of the presiding judge whether the ruling on a particular case is put into the public domain.

The fact that Google - Motorola argues against the significance of Judge Posner's ruling, implicitly announcing an appeal and belittling it as a «non-binding district court decision» (Judge Posner, a circuit judge who usually only hears apeals, was sitting «by designation» on a district court for that particular case), shows that some people made a mistake (or purposely wanted to mislead) by portraying the ruling as a defeat only, or mostly, for AJudge Posner's ruling, implicitly announcing an appeal and belittling it as a «non-binding district court decision» (Judge Posner, a circuit judge who usually only hears apeals, was sitting «by designation» on a district court for that particular case), shows that some people made a mistake (or purposely wanted to mislead) by portraying the ruling as a defeat only, or mostly, for AJudge Posner, a circuit judge who usually only hears apeals, was sitting «by designation» on a district court for that particular case), shows that some people made a mistake (or purposely wanted to mislead) by portraying the ruling as a defeat only, or mostly, for Ajudge who usually only hears apeals, was sitting «by designation» on a district court for that particular case), shows that some people made a mistake (or purposely wanted to mislead) by portraying the ruling as a defeat only, or mostly, for Apple.

Users will be able to apply these analytics on a granular basis, such as by looking at the cases judges rely on when they rule for a particular party or in a particular type of action.

For this reason, our Rules of Civil Procedure provide for the option of a summary judgment motion, which allows the moving party to proceed «directly» to a judge and make a pitch that this particular case can be decided by a motion judge and does not require a full trial.

In the Alberta Court of Appeal ruling reported as R v Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 Justice Brian K. O'Ferrall, speaking for a unanimous court, made short shrift of Justice Camp's judgment, at p. 1: ``... [W] e are satisfied that the trial judge's comments throughout the proceedings and in his reasons gave rise to doubts about the trial judge's understanding of the law governing sexual assaults and in particular, the meaning of consent and restrictions on evidence of the complainant's sexual activity... We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment.»

The silver lining in this decision is that the application judge restricted his decision to the particular facts of the case before him, explaining that «this ruling is meant to apply only to the narrow factual situation before the Court; it is not to apply more broadly to allow any insured to obtain interest on amounts left unapplied for after 104 weeks.»

The High Court ruled that a judge had been entitled to refuse an application for a particular person to act as a McKenzie friend despite that individual not being present in court at the time of the application.

The Supreme Court's decision does not say «it is only current membership at the time of appointment» that matters: it imports the 10 - year membership requirement from the general eligibility rules into the particular rules for the three seats for Québec, but adds that the 10 - year membership must be current, unless the appointee is a Québec Superior Court judge.

[82] That said, under the present Rule, unlike its predecessor which mandated the result, it is for the trial judge to determine in any particular case the nature and scope of whatever sanctions are to be applied.

In Cortina, the court upheld the trial judge's decision to award sole custody of teenage children to the father but varied the costs order to take into account the fact that a particular offer had expired three days before trial and thus was not in strict compliance with Rule 18 (14).

To be sure, such emails often require sorting through multiple layers of overlapping rules — for example, weaving state procedural rules with a particular court's local rules and, potentially, additional rules from a court division, individual judge, or clerk.

It may, however, form chambers, each consisting of three, five or seven Judges, either to undertake certain preparatory inquiries or to adjudicate on particular categories of cases in accordance with rules laid down for these purposes.

But when he starts reeling off statistics like how a particular judge tends to rule in certain types of cases, «they lean forward, put their elbows on the table, and start asking questions,» he says.

Because this Formal Advisory Opinion does not address the specific facts of a particular case, a judge does not receive the benefit of the «rule of reliance» by reviewing the Committee's general advice.

(b) to improve the knowledge of the European Union's primary and secondary law among judges, prosecutors and judicial staff, including fostering the knowledge of the procedures before the European Court of Justice, in particular the procedure for obtaining a preliminary ruling on the validity and / or interpretation of provisions of European law;

Justice Brown encouraged Judges to use the tools given to them, namely the Rules of Civil Procedure and the inherent jurisdiction of the court, to drill down and question whether certain summary judgment motions are appropriate, given the nature and progress of the particular lawsuit.

The ruling also alleges that Gratl told her client that she believed judges in Kitchener were afraid of her, and that a particular justice was «biased against everybody.»

The trial judge ruled that members of a Parish can change over time and therefore the Parish could not simply choose to sever itself from the Diocese based on the whims of the congregation at any particular time.

However, like the application judge, in the particular circumstances of this case, especially the lack of any real factual dispute, the court found that any technical error in the procedure followed was insufficient to undermine the result: Rule 2.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

A lawyer who appears before a particular judge all of the time is going to know how that judge usually rules on any given issue.

The judge commented that «the court recognises no religious distinctions and generally speaking passes no judgment on religious beliefs or on the tenets, doctrines or rules of any particular section of society.

So, what the learned, but possibly biased (remember, the 50/50 rule pro or con here) Judge has publicly stated as reasoning for the continuance of Dale's suit is, in «my» own words, that... «In my mind (according to how I personally see things in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reasonJudge has publicly stated as reasoning for the continuance of Dale's suit is, in «my» own words, that... «In my mind (according to how I personally see things in my own biased mind (I am human after all) from my own psychological / political perspective re how I want to apply the wording of the law in this particular case), Mr. Dale has the «legal» right to continue with his lawsuit because I, being the sole judge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reasonjudge of the presented facts and tactics of persuasion as presented by both sides in this dispute, side with Mr. Dale more so than with TREB and CREA for the following reason (s):