Sentences with phrase «rulings of the family court judge»

The Arizona Court of Appeals, therefore, affirmed the rulings of the family court judge in this case.

Not exact matches

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the ruling on Friday, saying the family had not persuaded the three - judge panel «that the individual prayers or other remarks to be given by students at graduation are, in fact, school - sponsored.»

Attorney General Eliot Spitzer collects the Working Families Party endorsement for gov — but seems to forget the ruling of State Supreme Court Judge Bernard Malone re David Soares.

«Adapted from the novel by Ian McEwan, Emma Thompson and Stanley Tucci star in this riveting, complex drama of a family - court judge facing a personal and professional crisis when she's asked to rule in the case of a teenager who is refusing a life - saving blood transfusion due to his family's religious beliefs.»

As many of you know by now, Jones, a former U.S. Attorney and scion of a political family that includes famed judge and U.S. Senator Howell Heflin, won what was previously considered an unlikely victory over Moore, a jurist who was twice removed from his role as chief justice of the Iron State's supreme court for willfully ignoring failing to enforce federal rulings.

But the state Supreme Court overturned Judge Hobgood's temporary stay, and as the state's administrative office handling Opportunity Scholarships rushes to get the vouchers into the hands of families and private schools before a final court ruling could find the program unlawful, Rep. Stam has been working hard to expand the voucher program to nearly double its intended size in time for the start of the school Court overturned Judge Hobgood's temporary stay, and as the state's administrative office handling Opportunity Scholarships rushes to get the vouchers into the hands of families and private schools before a final court ruling could find the program unlawful, Rep. Stam has been working hard to expand the voucher program to nearly double its intended size in time for the start of the school court ruling could find the program unlawful, Rep. Stam has been working hard to expand the voucher program to nearly double its intended size in time for the start of the school year.

While some judges, particularly those in the family division of the Ontario Court of Justice, may apply the rules in a manner that is meaningfully proportionate to the complexity and importance of the matters at issue in a case, such latitude is not often extended.

An appeal — including an application for permission to appeal — that lies to FC circuit or district judge can be leapfrogged to a High Court judge at the direction of the DFJ or HCJ where an important point of principle or practice is involved (Family Court (Composition and Distribution of Business) Rules 2014 (SI 2014/840).

High Court judges may praise the Access to Justice Act 1999 (Destination of Appeals)(Family Proceedings) Order 2009, the Family Proceedings (Amendment) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/636) and the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989)(Amendment) Rules 2009 (SI 209/637).

A family court judge ruled Wednesday that an obese man fighting for custody of his children, aged 5 and 6, will be put up for adoption.

A family court judge will review the divorce from bed and board petition and issue a ruling about who should move out of the family home or whether the home should be sold and how the proceeds should be divided.

He has successfully argued before at least one family court judge that ADR Rule 10 authorizes the award of fees as a sanction for violation of ADR Rule 9 regarding compensation.

While a response is awaited from the Family Procedure Rules Committee on a variety of recommendations on how the family courts might improve the lot of vulnerable witnesses and children, judges have been gradually improving the law to recognise the rights and needs of victims of abuse and child witnFamily Procedure Rules Committee on a variety of recommendations on how the family courts might improve the lot of vulnerable witnesses and children, judges have been gradually improving the law to recognise the rights and needs of victims of abuse and child witnfamily courts might improve the lot of vulnerable witnesses and children, judges have been gradually improving the law to recognise the rights and needs of victims of abuse and child witnesses.

Careful consideration has been given by a Working Group set up by Sir James Munby and chaired by two of the Family Division judges, Hayden J and Russell J as to what changes to the Family Procedure Rules would need to be put in place to make the court system more child inclusive and appropriately child centred to ensure that the child's wishes are heard.

Despite all this, the government has just brought in absurd new allocation rules which are apparently designed to overwhelm us with around one quarter of the family work which the county courts judges have hitherto dealt with and thereby save money.

(2.2) The regional senior judges of the Superior Court of Justice and the Senior Judge of the Family Court shall meet at least once in each year with the Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, on a day fixed by the Chief Justice, in order to consider this Act, the rules of court and the administration of justice generCourt of Justice and the Senior Judge of the Family Court shall meet at least once in each year with the Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, on a day fixed by the Chief Justice, in order to consider this Act, the rules of court and the administration of justice generCourt shall meet at least once in each year with the Chief Justice and the Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, on a day fixed by the Chief Justice, in order to consider this Act, the rules of court and the administration of justice generCourt of Justice, on a day fixed by the Chief Justice, in order to consider this Act, the rules of court and the administration of justice genercourt and the administration of justice generally.

(2) The judges of the Family Court shall meet at least once in each year, on a day fixed by the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, in order to consider this Act, the rules of court and the administration of justice generCourt shall meet at least once in each year, on a day fixed by the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, in order to consider this Act, the rules of court and the administration of justice generCourt of Justice, in order to consider this Act, the rules of court and the administration of justice genercourt and the administration of justice generally.

Article 24 - 2 The provisions of Articles 10 through 12 (Method of Filing Petition for Disqualification or Challenge; Statement of Opinions by Judge with Regard to Disqualification or Challenge; and Withdrawal of Judge) of the Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis to a family court research law clerk.

In 2014, she created the position of Senior Family Advisory Judge, filled by Justice Deborah Paulseth, to chair the family advisory committee, sit on the rules committee, and advance issues of the family court Family Advisory Judge, filled by Justice Deborah Paulseth, to chair the family advisory committee, sit on the rules committee, and advance issues of the family court family advisory committee, sit on the rules committee, and advance issues of the family court family court bench.

I also found it fascinating that the COA panel upheld the family court judge's right not to conduct a Rule 59 hearing at least, in part, because of the thoroughness of the Rule 59 motion filed by the husband's attorney:

[2] This rule is not intended, however, to affect a judge's ability to act on information as necessary to protect the health or safety of the judge or a member of a judge's family, court personnel, or other judicial officers if consistent with other provisions of this Code.

As a general rule, the higher the court, the fewer salaried women judges — 24 % of the Court of Appeal (up from 18 % in 2014); 22 % of the High Court (up from 18 % in 2014); 28 % of Registrars, Masters, Costs Judges and District Judges (Principal Registry of the Family Division); 27 % of Circuit Judges; 38 % of District Judges (County Courts); and 35 % of District Judges (Magistrates» Coucourt, the fewer salaried women judges — 24 % of the Court of Appeal (up from 18 % in 2014); 22 % of the High Court (up from 18 % in 2014); 28 % of Registrars, Masters, Costs Judges and District Judges (Principal Registry of the Family Division); 27 % of Circuit Judges; 38 % of District Judges (County Courts); and 35 % of District Judges (Magistrates» Cojudges — 24 % of the Court of Appeal (up from 18 % in 2014); 22 % of the High Court (up from 18 % in 2014); 28 % of Registrars, Masters, Costs Judges and District Judges (Principal Registry of the Family Division); 27 % of Circuit Judges; 38 % of District Judges (County Courts); and 35 % of District Judges (Magistrates» CouCourt of Appeal (up from 18 % in 2014); 22 % of the High Court (up from 18 % in 2014); 28 % of Registrars, Masters, Costs Judges and District Judges (Principal Registry of the Family Division); 27 % of Circuit Judges; 38 % of District Judges (County Courts); and 35 % of District Judges (Magistrates» CouCourt (up from 18 % in 2014); 28 % of Registrars, Masters, Costs Judges and District Judges (Principal Registry of the Family Division); 27 % of Circuit Judges; 38 % of District Judges (County Courts); and 35 % of District Judges (Magistrates» CoJudges and District Judges (Principal Registry of the Family Division); 27 % of Circuit Judges; 38 % of District Judges (County Courts); and 35 % of District Judges (Magistrates» CoJudges (Principal Registry of the Family Division); 27 % of Circuit Judges; 38 % of District Judges (County Courts); and 35 % of District Judges (Magistrates» CoJudges; 38 % of District Judges (County Courts); and 35 % of District Judges (Magistrates» CoJudges (County Courts); and 35 % of District Judges (Magistrates» CoJudges (Magistrates» Courts).

Lawyers need to do a better job of accounting for family law litigants» means when choosing how to proceed with a case, a Superior Court judge has ruled.

In the West Virginia Rules of Judicial Disciplinary Procedure, «judge» is defined as anyone - whether or not a lawyer - who is an officer of a judicial system and who performs judicial functions, including but not limited to justices of the Supreme Court of Appeals, circuit judges, family court judges, magistrates, mental hygiene commissioners, juvenile referees, special commissioners, and special masCourt of Appeals, circuit judges, family court judges, magistrates, mental hygiene commissioners, juvenile referees, special commissioners, and special mascourt judges, magistrates, mental hygiene commissioners, juvenile referees, special commissioners, and special masters.

I occasionally see or hear of family court judges issuing instructions for orders but asking attorneys not to reveal their ruling to their clients until the order is signed and filed.

Rule of Law Court of Appeal Varies Trial Decision in Chinn v. Hanrieder The Court of Appeal, in reasons for judgment released on June 27, 2013, in Chinn v. Hanrieder, 2013 BCCA 310 (CanLII), reversed the trial judge's holding that Ingrid Hanrieder held her interest in a family trust that held mineral rights on a secret trust for her late husband's two children, Bette Chinn and Dennis Hanrieder.

Difficult cases for judges to decide will prompt the presence of a family court - appointed advocate to help the judge make a ruling.

Family court judges in the U.S. base decisions in custody rulings on what is in the best interest of the child.

Unless there is a specific state statute allowing or disallowing adoption by LGBTQs or a ruling by the state Supreme Court, you are somewhat at the mercy of the family court judge that will be hearing your adoption Court, you are somewhat at the mercy of the family court judge that will be hearing your adoption court judge that will be hearing your adoption case.

Since many Family Law Attorneys spend so much of their time in court, they often have the advantage of having lengthy established relationships with other divorce attorneys and experts that you may contend with, as well as a great deal of familiarity with the judges, court rules and procedures that can impact the results you get in your case.

If two parents can agree on a parenting plan, they they wouldn't need The Family Courts, so Judges can not rule in favour of equal or shared custody.

On February 9, 2017, the Honorable Laurel M. Lee, Circuit Court Judge of the 13th Judicial Circuit in Hillsborough County and Chair of the Family Law Rules Committee of the Florida Bar Family Law Section, along with collaborative attorney Robert Merlin, Vice Chair of the Committee and a Board Member of the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals, stood before the Florida Supreme Court (video) to argue in favor of the adoption of collaborative law rules of procedure and professional conRules Committee of the Florida Bar Family Law Section, along with collaborative attorney Robert Merlin, Vice Chair of the Committee and a Board Member of the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals, stood before the Florida Supreme Court (video) to argue in favor of the adoption of collaborative law rules of procedure and professional conrules of procedure and professional conduct.

A recent ruling — in which a judge said it would be a «wasteful» use of court's time to deal with a dispute over dog custody — highlights a disconnect between the historical jurisprudence and societal values around pets, says Toronto family lawyer Steven Benmor.