Not exact matches
The result was that there was no
statistical impact on the
run, so the
study concluded that «Omega 3 Chia loading appears a viable option for enhancing performance for endurance events lasting > 90 minutes and allows athletes to decrease their dietary intake of sugar while increasing their intake of Omega 3 fatty acids but offered no performance advantages.»
Then, the researchers (including a member of our Scientific Advisory Board and
statistical wizard, James Krieger),
ran the
studies through a variety of equations to ensure the results were accurate.
In part because it plays a role in reducing weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, and so on (for more details on how this distorts the results, including evidence from other
studies on how these
statistical tricks hide real health benefits from much higher amounts of
running, see my earlier blog entry).
For
statistical reasons which are beyond the scope of this
study, we have substituted the ordinal rank for the nominal value for each factor in
running our analysis.
But, he insists, judges are unlikely to understand or care about a
statistical study, or an experiment on judicial hunches garlanded with cites to the behavioral literature, or management experts telling them how to
run their courts.
Now, I've no ability to
run a proper
study here, lacking nearly all
statistical knowledge as well as the time it would take to do a proper job.
If you have any questions about posting, correlations,
statistical nerdery, or have some ideas for other data
studies we should
run, let me know!