Ultimately, this just goes to show how much those who
run the club value working for it themselves, don't it?
Not exact matches
Arsenal aren't the biggest spenders so perhaps won't go higher than # 70m, but in truth Madrid should perhaps take the money and
run for an injury - prone player low on confidence whose time at the
club is surely up and whose
value may only continue to tumble down in coming transfer windows.
In the long
run this will damage the
club and its
value a lot more than saving 5 or 10 million pounds by not paying more than 35 million for a Lacazette or other badly needed player.
The 25 - year - old winger has a contract
running until 2016 and while his
club value him at # 20m, he will be available to leave for nothing should they not agree to sell beforehand.
«Arsenal are a great
club with the way they're
run and their
values,» Carragher said on Sky Sports.
anyway the
club is
run independent of his ownership it is arsenal holdings plc that
runs the
club not stan kronke he is just the majority shareholder in the
club so he just has his money in the
club not investment purposes but just as a shareholder just like in any business shareholders want to make sure there
value is increasing in the
clubs value so that the
club is doing well.
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our
club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being
run by corporations who
valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this
club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved
club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the
club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
Benzema's current deal at with the Spanish side
runs until 2019, with the La Liga giants believing that should they extend his deal with the
club, his transfer
value will increase.
which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for
club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which
runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their
value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course
Perhaps the board do not have the interests of the
club at heart (beyond the
value of their own investment) but then neither do those who
ran onto the pitch — their only objective was personal attention seeking.
KEY FACT: Tottenham are on a 14 - match unbeaten
run against Swansea MATCH ODDS: Swansea 11/1 Draw 17/4 Spurs 1/3 bet365 Pick: Spurs win & Over 2.5 goals @ 10/11 ANDY SAYS: Have to go with my former
club here, they will have too much... 0 - 2 GRAEME SAYS: Don't see this being easy but Tottenham should win... 1 - 2 SILKY SAYS: Comfortable win for Spurs — easy three points... 0 - 3 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Just over # 2 and Christian Eriksen's looks very good
value
Liverpool is a
club that is a real strong family football
club, with
values and ethics that
run over many years.
I think the people who
run the
club have to play a part in this story, and an unwillingness to invest — perhaps in tandem with Wenger's natural indecision and desire to get
value for money — saw our best players leave.
Whoever signed off on getting that clueless lump upfield Benteke is a disgrace too the badge, this shit of buying average players for sometimes double or even treble there true
value is a joke.IM SICK TO THE BACK TEETH OF FSG, TRANSFER COMMITTEE AND THAT KNO BHEAD AYRE
RUNNING THIS GREAT
CLUB... THANK YOU AND GOODNIGHT!!!
He was a
valued member in the
club's FA Cup
run in 2011, and he even netted a crucial goal against Sir Alex Ferguson's Manchester United side, not bad for a big, clumsy centre back.
«The shorter the player's contract, the less transfer
value he has to
clubs, as there is always the risk to the
club that the player will simply
run down his contract.
But by being a member, it shows that you support and
value the sponsorship of the AKC Parent
Club in
running these events, it is giving support to the people who function on the Board setting policy, rules, and organization of the events.