The idea for the makeover came out of a long -
running debate here at MoneySense.
Not exact matches
Thanks, Tom, for the way you
ran the
debate and your column
here.
So yes, the Gentiles were perturbed and tried to
run them out of town — But
here's one for you if you care to
debate history.
Here's an excerpt as Chris Quinn reacts to my largely inaudible questions of whether being at the
debate provoked any nostalgia for campaigning and whether she thinks she'll ever again
run for office:
My colleagues
here online are providing a
running commentary on the
debate, spiced up with apercus from Gary Gibbon and Cathy Newman, our political team, plus all the scuttlebutt from Westminster, plus video clips of the best bits of the
debate.
Here's Jason Beattie's run down of five things we learned from the debate, and here's Kevin Maguire's verdict on who
Here's Jason Beattie's
run down of five things we learned from the
debate, and
here's Kevin Maguire's verdict on who
here's Kevin Maguire's verdict on who won.
Another
debate on climate sensitivity is
running here: http://www.ukweatherworld.co.uk/forum/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=25003&start=1
We are
here today participating in a wonderful American democratic tradition:
running for president, meeting the voters,
debating the issues.
(See my take on this
debate, which
ran last year in NRO,
here.)
I actually responded to an entry made about this post but I thought it was a valid contribution to the general thread of
debate here: The general feel I have for services like Twitter is that they provide a very easy and very simple way to get the information and thoughts out there for people who don't want the responsibility of
running a blog, want to avoid the invasive data - mining of the social network and very quickly fire off something witty, something silly, something topical or genuinely answer that all important Twitter question... What are they doing?
Here is where the
debate on artist -
run centres in Canada usually resides, looping and circling around a frustrated auto - critique of what was and what is, a collective commiseration and even, at worst, resignation.
Updated, 5:21 p.m. Belatedly,
here's a link to a worthy «Room for
Debate» feature on universities and fossil fuel investments that
ran in January.