Sentences with phrase «running deficit in»

«If you're running a deficit in the government account, you're crowding out private borrowing, and we're financing that difference with foreign capital.

Social Security is expected to start running a deficit in 2016, meaning that it will be paying out more than it is receiving in taxes.

But shy would Nigerian government be running deficit in every institution?

Also, I'm not sure what you mean by «talk of a «structural deficit» is rubbish»: as things stand, without some major fiscal contraction, do you expect the government to still be running a deficit in a few years from now?

While I understand that the NDP must feel intense pressure to capture votes — including from people who have never taken a course from John Smithin — I often wish that the NDP would show a bit more policy leadership on the issue of the deficit and debt. I was particularly disappointed during the 2008 federal election campaign when Mr. Layton stated, unequivocally, that the NDP would not run a deficit in the following year if elected (even though it was clear that Canada was entering a recession).

Marc Lee, economist at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, a progressive Vancouver think tank, says that government action on the reforms suggested by labour will be hampered by ideological objections to running deficits in bad times.

The Kansas City Royals came back from 2 run deficit in the 9th inning to tie the 5th game of the World Series.

Some countries must run deficits in order to purchase goods from those that run surpluses.

The Dodgers erased a 3 - run deficit IN THE NINTH INNING.

Not exact matches

Higher U.S. yields can put pressure on the currencies of emerging market countries that run current account deficits such as Indonesia and India, said Satoshi Okagawa, senior global markets analyst for Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation in Singapore.

Premier Kathleen Wynne defended the government's pre-election budget, which will run a $ 6.7 - billion deficit in 2018 - 2019, saying Moody's change wasn't a credit downgrade, which would effect borrowing costs for the province.

That should ensure that borrowing costs will remain low, but in the longer - run trade deficits and shrinking current account surpluses could threaten Japan's ability to finance a debt pile that is twice the size of its economy, the highest ratio in the developed world.

In addition, they argued, the curve will likely steepen as the U.S. government runs a bigger deficit and issues more debt, they said.

In January and February, the U.S. trade deficit with those three large economic systems, accounting for about 40 percent of world's demand and output, was running at an annual rate of $ 612.3 billion, a 3 percent increase from the same period of 2017.

The American trade deficit with China in January and February was running at an annual rate of $ 391.2 billion — a 20 percent increase over the same period of 2017.

Given that the government is currently running a deficit and is $ 20 trillion in debt, scratching up the money to redeem those bonds would require either higher taxes or more government borrowing.

«He always said through the (global economic) crisis when he was running up very substantial deficits, which would not be his preferred approach, «I'm not an ideologue, I'm a pragmatic person,»» Pothier said in an interview.

Japan began running significant deficits in the early 1990s to jump - start its economy.

Prohibited from running a deficit, and dogged by sinking credit ratings, these jurisdictions are cutting corners in some shocking places.

Following the 2015 election, the Liberal government abandoned pledges to run annual deficits of no more than $ 10 billion and to balance the books in four years.

According to Trump's own trade representatives, the answer is no — the U.S. does run a deficit with Canada when it comes to goods, but its surplus in services far outweighs that, leaving an overall surplus of $ 12.5 billion for 2016.

In normal circumstances he believed in a balanced budget and maybe a bit of a surplus for bad times but what he believed was fatal to a nation was running deficit trade imbalanceIn normal circumstances he believed in a balanced budget and maybe a bit of a surplus for bad times but what he believed was fatal to a nation was running deficit trade imbalancein a balanced budget and maybe a bit of a surplus for bad times but what he believed was fatal to a nation was running deficit trade imbalances.

However, even when the federal government ran surpluses in the late 1990s, our current account deficit continued to increase.

Not running a deficit under any circumstances was the position that the Conservatives had run on in the 2008 election, and the other parties had made similar promises.

If the United States is running a capital account surplus mainly because the world is awash in excess savings, then it is unlikely that a cut in the fiscal deficit will cause a drop in the U.S. current account surplus.

Excess capacity in the private sector, most importantly in the job market, is still the biggest problem we face, and given the cost of capital right now, the best way to both reduce unemployment and the short - run deficit is to grow faster.

In this case, the United States runs a «good» trade deficit, driven by higher investment, not lower savings.

By second - order effects, I mean whether cutting the deficit will in the short run increase other forms of investment and consumption demand by increasing confidence or reduce other forms of investment and consumption demand by reducing spending.

This reflects a view that Trump has consistently maintained in his personal rhetoric and that has been reflected in the official documents put out by some of the members of his trade team — trade deficits are per se bad, reducing them induces prosperity mechanically, and so there is no downside to a trade war with a country with whom the United States runs a large trade deficit.

According to the Mr. Oliver, and presumably the PM, all governments in advanced economies (e.g., G7 countries, G20 countries, and the EURO area) are unethical, because they all run deficits and have no interest in eliminating them.

The Trustees themselves explain that Social Security's two biggest trust funds will start running terminal deficits in 2020 until they are fully depleted 14 years later.

According to Joe Oliver, most governments in Canada since Confederation were unethical because they ran deficits.

If the House passes their bill and the Senate passes theirs, they'll have to hammer out a version in conference committee that satisfies House leaders while not running afoul of the long - run deficit rule.

And so long as the legislation still increases the long - run deficit, it's a nonstarter in the Senate, which explains why that body has taken a different approach.

If the Conservative government wants to stabilize the debt - to - GDP ratio at 25 per cent, then at that ratio, the government must run a permanent and growing structural deficit that will result in the government's debt increasing at the same rate of growth as the economy.

While China was busy selling more to the U.S., it was buying more from other countries, and ran a $ 9.86 billion deficit with the rest of the world in the quarter.

However, in order for this not to happen the government would have to run ongoing deficits to stabilize the debt ratio.

With its flexible financial system and the gradual elimination by the 1970s of all capital restrictions, the United States was able quickly to adapt, and began running large trade deficits whose costs, in the form of unemployment and consumer debt, it was willing to absorb for geopolitical advantage, the importance of which soared during the Cold War.

However, in times of recession, you want government to run a deficit.

In the 19th Century England and the United States played these two roles, with excess English savings pouring into the United States to fund growth in history's most successful emerging market, and while the British ran persistent trade surpluses, and the US ran persistent trade deficits, both countries got richeIn the 19th Century England and the United States played these two roles, with excess English savings pouring into the United States to fund growth in history's most successful emerging market, and while the British ran persistent trade surpluses, and the US ran persistent trade deficits, both countries got richein history's most successful emerging market, and while the British ran persistent trade surpluses, and the US ran persistent trade deficits, both countries got richer.

His view, as articulated both on Twitter and at Tuesday's press conference with Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven, is that trade wars are good for the United States — in fact, «good, and easy to win» — because we currently run a trade deficit.

Lacking in domestic savings and wanting to grow, the US must import surplus savings from abroad, and run massive current - account deficits to attract the foreign capital.

Trump was overheard telling donors at an event in Missouri the previous night that he insisted to Trudeau that the United States runs a trade deficit with its neighbour to the north — without any idea of whether this is the case.

Or that they'll run a $ 12 billion deficit in...

If there is such a thing as a global engine of growth, in the latter case, it is the country that is able (or is forced) to import the most amount of capital and export the most amount of demand (i.e. run the largest trade deficit).

The authors acknowledge that the plan will add to short - term deficits but contend that faster economic growth will pay for the plan and reduce deficits in the long run.

«The concern now is that the Fed may run out of Treasuries» During 1936 - 1937 the reserve authorities raised the reserve ratios in an effort to reduce the huge volume of excess reserves in the member banks, while at the same timer being forced to continue purchasing operations in order to assist the treasury inn its deficit financing.

Most managers running retail and pension money have no idea what a triple - hook rating means for any company with massive cash flow deficits operating in a financial environment in which the Fed is not printing trillions of dollars that can be recycled into bad ideas.

In our view running annual deficits approaching 2 per cent of GDP would be «imprudent» and would put at risk the government's commitment to a «sustainable» fiscal framework.

Our plan has run large deficits the past several years and, as a result, we are in the midst of making some major changes.