Sentences with phrase «running the model forward»

We ran the model forward to the year 2040, along a business - as - usual trajectory based on «do - nothing» trends — that is, without any feedback loops that would change the underlying trend.
Their method runs the model forwards.
Then, for the next year, pick another random historical year's weather, run the model forwards another year, and so on.

Not exact matches

Therefore in a scientific model you can run the clock forward or back to model the future or the past and make predictions.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Despite having run the highest - resolution simulation to date, Wetzel continues to push forward, and he is in the process of running an even higher - resolution, more - sophisticated simulation that will allow him to model the very faintest dwarf galaxies around the Milky Way.
While the engineering is relatively straight forward, the same can't be said of the model line - up which runs to seven different models.
Insignia standard equipment reflects the Select model line and includes Recaro bucket front seats, perforated Siena leather trim, bi-xenon headlamps with LED daytime running lamps, adaptive forward lighting and premium audio system with seven speakers and seven - inch colour screen.
These models feature daytime running lights that now form a halo around the outside perimeter of the headlights, and standard LED forward turn signals are positioned on the front of the trapezoidal wheel flares.
Titanium models can also be equipped with adaptive cruise control with a forward collision warnings system, automatic highbeams, xenon headlights, a heated steering wheel, 19 - inch wheels, LED daytime running lights, a panoramic sunroof and automatic parking systems.
Interestingly, the iA — which is the least expensive model in Scion's lineup now that the iQ has finished its short run — seems to boast the best standard safety tech of any Scion model, coming standard with a rear - view camera and a standard low - speed precollision system that uses a forward laser sensor to alert the driver of an imminent collision and can even activate the brakes to prevent or reduce the damage in the event of an accident.
While WD's first USB 3.0 product is a desktop 3.5 - inch drive, I'm personally looking forward to Seagate's Black Armor PS110, a portable 2.5 - inch drive; over an actual USB 3.0 port, such as that announced on some HP models, this drive can run, unpowered, at faster speeds than its USB 2.0 cousins.
The reason I'm hopeful and positive is that these huge multinational corporations run on bottom line profits, and since they've seen such a big drop off in ebook profitability due to dramatically fewer sales, I think they'll be experimenting with pricing models and sales to fine tune their strategies moving forward.
during SP mission Nightshift • Fixed issue with last mission not listed in REPLAY MISSIONS list • Fixed issue on the SP mission Night Shift where three of the marines that repel down from the Osprey at the start of the level have PLR models instead of the right marine models • Has been made harder to fail missions due to zero tolerance friendly fire • Fixed MG nest objective on Operation Guillotine • Fix for music climax on mission «Fear No Evil» • Fixed issues that occurred if user were backtracking after fight at elevator on SP mission «Comrades» • Adding a back button to SP campaign select difficulty screen • Removed slomo from jump into train on SP mission «The Great Destroyer» • Fixed glitches in subway Quick Time Events in mission «The Great Destroyer» • Increased quality of the loading screen images • Fixed glitch that made it possible to reach Solomon train QTE with the wrong weapon equipped in mission «Semper Fidelis» • Fixed final sound fade out on SP mission «Thunder Run» • Removed sound fade on convoy ride in mission «Operation Guillotine» • Fixed squad mates coming through wall after intro on SP mission «Operation Guillotine» • SP mission, «The Great Destroyer»: moved Campaign Cleared achievement until after the Dima outro • Fixed soldiers inside of terrain at start of level in «OPERATION GUILLOTINE» • SP mission, «The Great Destroyer»: Fixed streaming issue which could lead to out of memory when streaming in Subway ride • Improved music and music fade on tank encounter in mission «Operation Guillotine» • Sound on Operation Guillotine: Fixed trading floor crash camera shake and rumble • Fade later when driving in to tunnel on «OPERATION GUILLOTINE» • Hide cross hair during Solomon intro & climb out scene on «Operation Swordbreaker» • Fixes on «OPERATION SWORDBREAKER»: Skip VO urging the player to move forward if the player has already moved.
From the waist down the model completely crushes and squishes into itself trying to keep up the running cycle as he tiptoes forward.
PIOMAS has been run in a forward mode (and hence without data assimilation) to yield seasonal predictions for the sea ice outlook (Zhang et al. 2008) and has also provided input to statistical forecasts (Lindsay et al. 2008) and fully - coupled models.
Could the Ice models be forced to an «ice free» state at the ides of March, then run backwards to see what the conditions would have to be (IMHO, primarily ocean surface temperature and profile with depth) at the end of the previous September to give this result when run forward?
Rather than questioning the primary role of the atmospheric CO2, our modelling results allow us to put forward that the atmospheric CO2 is not the whole story and that, owing to the overwhelming effect and interplay between the paleogeography, the water cycle and the seasonal response, the climate system may undergo subtle climatic changes (as the 4 °C global warming simulated here between the Aptian and the Maastrichtian runs).
The Arctic Cap Nowcast Forecast System (ACNFS) was run in forward model mode, without assimilation, initialized with a June 1, 2013 analysis, for eight simulations using archived Navy atmospheric forcing fields from 2005 - 2012.
The climate models can be run backwards just as well as forward.
The skill of the Arctic Cap model run in forward mode for a season is not yet quantified.
For example, for the climate models you count wind them back to 1980 and then run the forward until the present day.
As I said on another blog, what would be an interesting comparison would be a comparison of data to output from (e.g.) unmodified AR4 codes run further forward to 2013 (or as recent as is practicable) using the actual forcings, starting with the exact run states of the models at the end of the verification period for AR4 (that is the end - point where «known» forcings were used, rather than scenarios).
I do have an independent way to test your speculation — which is to see whether my forward model of the GISS - E2 - R historic run is significantly improved by modifying the forcing input under the assumption that the LU data were not correctly included.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z