This does not mean that it is a Word which is simply present in
a sacred event of the past, nor does it mean that it is merely addressed to historical events, or confined to an historical realm.
For not only do the priestly and institutional forms
of Christianity submit to the heteronomous authority
of a series
of events that are irrevocably
past, but the thought
of the Christian theologian himself has been closed to a truly dialectical meaning
of the
sacred.
A faith that names Jesus either as the Son
of God or as the prophet
of God must be a backward movement to a disincarnate and primordial form
of Spirit, a movement annulling the
events of the Incarnation and the Crucifixion by resurrecting Jesus either in the form
of the exalted Lord or as the proclaimer
of an already distant and alien majesty
of God: hence an orthodox and priestly Christianity is inevitably grounded in the
sacred authority and power
of the
past.