I looked out over the massive, at times angry, crowd and I listened to Dr. Katz speak
sacred words of truth as it hit me: the spirit uniting American Second Amendment supporters is not new and it is not going away.
He spoke
the sacred words of the Catholic mass to God in heaven and the wine was transformed into the blood of Christ.
So sacred was it held to be at the time of the making of the Code of Manu, greatest of the law books, that it was therein decreed that a lowly Sudra, i.e., low caste man, who so much as listened to the sacred text would have molten metal poured into his ears, and his tongue cut out if he pronounced
the sacred words of the holy Vedas.1 «Whether such laws were ever actually enforced may be doubted.
It achieves today's
sacred word of the times by being, «interactive» (aaahhooommm...).
Not exact matches
When the architects
of our Republic wrote the magnificent
words of the Constitution and the Declaration
of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir... Instead
of honoring this
sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked «insufficient funds.»
Maybe when we give ourselves to ancient
words and
sacred texts, and embrace routines and traditions, we can remember that we are not here for what we can get out
of worship; we are here to give ourselves away in worship.
You however don't see your own hypocrisy in greater depth when you say that the bible was deliberately written to be
sacred and holy, without ANY sourcing and you take the
word of people who lived a really long time ago who also can not provide you with anything more than «eye - witness accounts» which have undoubtedly been changed, tweaked or even just falsly made up in order to cement their point.
HEAD KNIGHT: We are the keepers
of the
sacred words: Nee, Pen, and Nee - wom!
He got it from the
words of the apostles, the apostles
words were
sacred writings (Scriptures).
«Muslims believe the Quran is the
word of God, so holy that people should wash their hands before even touching the
sacred book» is really saying something, considering they don't even do that after using the bathroom!
Why does CNN first
of all show such a DISTURBING picture
of a disgusting magazine on the most
sacred of all Books... THE Bible and the
word of God.
Sometimes the
words of the
sacred text are thought to be the very
words of God himself, ipsissima verba, the human element in the situation being merely instrumental.
I observe that you teach us only a portion
of the
sacred writings — the best as I view it — and I infer that you reject the teachings
of the rabbis to the effect that the
words of the law are the very
words of God, having been with God in heaven even before the times
of Abraham and Moses.
In Romans, Barth said that the
Word of God can be uttered only when the predicate Deus revelatus has as its subject Deus absconditus31 The vast ocean
of so - called reality that is the profane world
of a completely autonomous mode
of human existence has left the island
of the
sacred completely submerged.
The
word «holy» was to show that followers
of God were «set apart» (
sacred, consecrated, venerated) from other people who were not God's followers.
When a man is ordained to the
sacred ministry in any
of the Reformed churches — and this includes the Anglican Communion, which even the staunchest defenders
of its «catholicity» must acknowledge is a «reformed» catholic communion — a form
of words is used in which the centrality
of the preaching office in that ministry is affirmed.
First,
sacred literatures are, as a usual rule, regarded as in some sense the
word of God or the gods, revealed to man.
Second, being the
word of God, the
sacred scriptures became the foundations upon which the several religions were erected.
The object
of religious valuing, in other
words, is «
sacred.»»
In Oriental Mysticism, Altizer observes that Heidegger, also, maintains that being is not an eternal reality equitable with the
sacred or God; rather, it is a historical event involved in the establishment
of Dasein, human existence.2 Heidegger comments: «If I were to write a theology, which I am sometimes tempted to do, the
word being would not be allowed to appear in it.
Many Christians I know (and I am one
of them) would say that the very physical natural
of the rituals reminds us that we have an embodied, enacted faith — and that embodiedness and enactedness is (if those are
words) is just want enables us to see all
of life is
sacred.
Only the Christian can speak the liberating
word of the death
of God because only the Christian has died in Christ to the transcendent realm
of the
sacred and can realize in his own participation in the forward - moving body
of Christ the victory
of the self - negation
of Spirit.
The Gregorian sound, and the practice
of chanting, whether by specialists or by non-specialists, gives the most perfect context for the hearing
of the
words of the
sacred scripture.
Gregorian chant gives an elevated tone
of voice to the texts
of our
sacred praises, conveying the special character
of the
words and the holy nature
of what is being enacted and undertaken.
Moreover, priestly religion in all its expressions binds its adherents to a particular
Word and a particular community as the sole arena
of the redemptive
sacred.
In other
words, whether we protest or revolt — and even revolution can be necessary, indeed it can be the
sacred duty
of a Christian in certain circumstances — we are always still imprisoned within our own concrete situation.
The Latin
word religio meant devotion or commitment, «a conscientious concern for what really matters»; the English
word «religion», while often implying a sense
of the
sacred, originally referred to the human attitude
of devotion.
This does not mean that it is a
Word which is simply present in a
sacred event
of the past, nor does it mean that it is merely addressed to historical events, or confined to an historical realm.
Nichols explains Gilson's insight: «As with the two natures
of the
Word Incarnate according to the Christology
of Chalcedon, two wisdoms»
sacred doctrine and the philosophy
of being» collaborate intimately but without confusion.»
A parallel can be found in a civil right as
sacred as that
of free speech, which can not be infringed but does suffer some regulation: pornography, fighting
words, and libel are not protected from state law by the First Amendment.
Our secularized, de-absolutized anti-culture reaches now even into our churches and other
sacred spaces, dictating a partly unconscious watering - down into «niceness»
of tough Christian understandings and an emptying - out
of Christian
words and concepts.
Such a feminist hermeneutics
of liberation reconceptualizes the understanding
of Scripture as nourishing bread rather than as unchanging
sacred word engraved in stone.
Only a
Word that negates its ground in the primordial
sacred can actually move into the fallen reality
of the profane.
Ground Zero is kind
of «
sacred» for lack
of a better
word, to the families and supporters
of the men and women who lost their lives trying to save life and are protecting our rights to say what we want.
In place
of the solemn chants
of the Church, ballroom ditties are taken and twisted, and adapted to the
sacred words by some make - shift dabbler in the science
of harmony, without art and in most cases without even intelligence.
Its as if the modern Church has decided that what makes the Bible
sacred is its inerrancy, that what qualifies it as the
Word of God is its historical and scientific accuracy.
We are not powerless and fearful, not us: and so I pray and I work; I make coffee in the morning and hot meals to gather around the table at suppertime; I worship and sing out
words of promise and praise; I raise children and read good books; I pray for my enemies and write letters and send money and show up to fold clothes and drop off meals with an extra bag
of groceries; I advocate with the marginalized and amplify the oppressed and antagonize the Empire with a grin on my face; I will honour those who get after the work
of the Kingdom and celebrate; I learn how to listen to those with whom I disagree; I abandon the idea that we can baptize sinful practices in the name
of sacred purposes; I will stand in the middle
of the field near my house with my face turned up to the rain and consider it a minor baptism.
Writes Rollins: «The
words of the Bible, wonderful as they often are, must not be allowed to stand in for God's majestic
Word, as if the
words and phrases have been conferred with some
sacred status and the phonetic patterns given divine power.
I have a similar way
of framing the great question
of the West: Will we live as if the authority
of the
sacred posed the greatest threat to human freedom — or as if God's
Word provided the soundest, most trustworthy basis for freedom?
In the services
of worship in Judaism, a-strong connection had always been made between the act
of reading the
sacred word aloud and the praise
of God in the worshiping community.5 Jesus» for example, chose this important act
of oral reading to inaugurate his public ministry:
Alcoholics Anonymous, being «spiritual, not religious,» doesn't use the Bible at all; rather it uses another
sacred text, the inspired
Word of God as expressed through Bill Wilson, the Big Book... Unlike the Oxford Group, which claimed salvation and redemption by Jesus through the Oxford Group, AA proclaims «recovery» by one s «Higher Power» through the Twelve Steps
of Alcoholics Anonymous (Ken Ragge, The Real AA: Behind the Myth
of 12 - Step Recovery [AZ: Sharp Press, 1998], pp. 82 - 83).
In fact, the ichthus or «fish,» which became the
sacred symbol found repeatedly on the walls
of the catacombs where the persecuted Christians took refuge, is an acronym formed from the first letters
of the Greek
words for «Jesus Christ, Son
of God, Savior.»
Literal - minded Moslems have, no doubt, often enough taken these as literal pictures
of the future life just as Christians have taken literally the pictures
of immortal existence as given in their
sacred book; but many Moslems, like many Christians, believe that these
words are but symbols through which the Prophet attempts to give some conception
of the life hereafter, which he obviously believes may be one
of bitter judgment or
of supernal delight.
Reminding the church that it was still subject to the judgment
of God, he said that «every vehicle
of God's grace, the preacher
of the
word, the prince
of the church, the teacher
of theology, the historic institution, the written
word, the
sacred canon, all these are in danger
of being revered as if they were themselves divine.
Although the notion
of revelation does not appear formally within the Bible (and in fact does not become a central theme
of theology until after the Enlightenment), the
sacred writings and traditions all invite us to listen closely, and they promise that we shall hear a
word bearing good news.
Tip your face to the heavy sky until you feel like a woman in a poem; surely a poet could spare a
word or two for the tired thirties
of womanhood and the
sacred discipline
of pausing in the midst
of the rushing, for the snowflakes and the joy to gather in your hair like fleeting stars.
All growth in holiness, all increase in depth
of spirit, wisdom, charity, courage, reverence and glorification
of the Father in individual souls is directly and personally the work
of Jesus the
Word through his own
sacred humanity.
32 The
Word becoming flesh in Jesus «is only truly and actually real if it effects the death
of the original
sacred, the death
of God himself.»
In the
words of an ancient prayer, it is the visible expression
of «that wonderful and
sacred mystery» which speaks to us and works on us, through the very imperfection, weakness, error, and even the sin
of the empirical institution, to manifest in the world
of time and space the abiding reality
of God's operation in the event
of Christ for human wholeness.
The
words of institution
of the Lord's Supper, still heard around the world in the most
sacred of Christian rites, bear witness to this conviction, «This cup is the new covenant in my blood» (I Cor.