Sentences with phrase «safer than a stock»

Decades of falling interest rates has taught individual investors that bonds are safer than stocks.

Despite all the negative chatter about low - paying fixed income these days, bonds are still safer than stocks and it pays an income, a key part of a defensive portfolio.

Plus you can pull your initial investment without penalties if something comes up so it can be safer than stocking it in a 401 in the event of you needing emergency funds.

They are safer than stocks, though, and also give you the chance to easily diversify your portfolio, which insulates you a bit from downturns in the market.

Pros: Better return than bonds and the other above asset classes; diversification; safer than stocks

That's because fixed income, which is still considered safer than stocks, starts becoming more attractive.

Bonds diversify your portfolio as they are considered safer than stocks and less volatile.

Bonds are generally viewed as safer than stocks.

A lot of people think bonds are safer than stocks but Nick Murray in Simple Wealth, Inevitable Wealth makes a very good argument that bonds are actually more risky — the risk being that inflation will eat up portfolio value and you are more likely to outlive your investments.

I am happy because it is more than i can get at a bank and it seems a bit safer than the stock market.

Stocks trading at low multiples of their earnings are safer than stocks at high multiples.

This is why short term investments (< 5 — 10 years) should be in very safe investments like bonds / GICs, potentially lower returns (depending on market conditions), but much much safer than stocks.

It is no longer true that bonds are safer than stocks.

Even bonds, although considered safer than stocks, can't match stocks in the long run.

Real Estate lending investments provide a higher return and are safer than stocks, bonds, and mutual funds.

Not exact matches

«I've been doing this for more than a year now — moving a little bit away from the stock market to safer investments,» she explains.

LUSARDI: Question three has to do about risk diversification: «Do you think the following statement is true or false: buying a single company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.»

Treasurys and gold are seen as safer assets to hold than stocks.

In my view, the explanation for share - price gains that are stronger than the economic outlook justifies is that hot money fleeing Europe is looking for safe havens — one of which is the U.S. stock market.

Again, when risk - aversion kicks in during the completion of a market cycle, central bank liquidity does not reliably support stocks, because safe liquidity is seen as a desirable asset rather than an inferior one.

Obviously you are safer buying compounded earnings cheap than dear, because if you have a stock at eighteen or four - teen or eleven times earnings, and it takes a very damp climate indeed to suppress a record at those ratios.

Because bondholders receive a fixed interest rate and get paid before stockholders, bonds are safer investments than stocks.

If you're a dividend growth investor who prefers a bit more of a bird in the hand (rather than two in the bush), this stock offers one of the biggest safe dividends out there.

Then, boring and somewhat safer stocks will be much easier to hold than riskier assets such as the FANGs.

Bonds are generally considered a far safer investment than stocks.

I'm not saying Blue Apron is a safe long - term investment, but it probably has a better chance of doubling than most penny stocks.

Bonds might be a safer investment than stocks, but they're certainly not foolproof.

But in the last few episodes of sharp stock market drops, bonds went up (US government bonds are a safe haven asset and appreciate in crisis periods) so the only thing better than 3 months worth of expenses in a money market fund is having 3 + x months worth of expenses in the bond portfolio due to higher bond yields and negative correlation between bonds and stocks.

27 of 94 Monthly Paying (MoPay) U.S. dividend stocks were tagged «safer» by showing positive annual returns, and free cash flow yields greater than...

Historically, over long periods of time, money invested in riskier assets such as stocks has generally rewarded investors with higher returns than funds invested in ultra safe and liquid assets.

Are other precious metals more effective than gold as safe havens from turmoil in stock and bond markets?

While I don't put much stock in home birth horror stories as evidence that home birth is less safe than hospital (because I don't know how they compare to the number of hospital horror stories), I put even LESS stock in «I would have died if I hadn't been in the hospital» stories.

Picente added, «By citing and ensuring the repair of more than 300 properties each year, we can eventually create a stable base of lead safe housing stock for our residents.»

And because you're collecting immediate income, you're lowering your cost basis on the shares you're buying, which means this strategy is actually safer than purchasing shares of the underlying stock outright.

Another option, though may be not as safe as CDs or money market accounts, is high quality dividend paying stocks (always understand that investing in the stock market is riskier than putting money in bank accounts), some with more than 5 % dividend yield at the end of 2010.

This is precisely what makes this kind of trade safer than simply purchasing shares of the underlying stock the «traditional» way.

Purchasing a home is seen by many as a safer bet than investing in the fluctuating stock market.

For example, telecom stocks make up less than 3 % of the S&P 500 index, but as a whole the industry is a very safe and consistent dividend paying sector.

These are probably safer than municipal bonds, but rising interest rates would have a similar effect on asset pricing — water stocks would take a dip in a rising rate environment.

On the other hand, if you were to put that $ 10,000 into safer investments generating an average annual 4 % return, in 40 years, you'd have just $ 48,000 — less than a quarter of what a stock - heavy portfolio would have given you.

Within stocks, large companies (large - cap stocks) are seen as safer than mid-sized companies (mid-cap stocks) which are likewise seen as less risky than small companies (small - cap stocks).

Bonds are actually a safe way of investing than stocks.

Larger companies are usually seen as safer investments than mid - and small - cap companies, though all stocks carry a certain level of risk.

That's not to say that a mutual fund won't decrease in value if there is a market correction in either stocks or bonds, but it is safer than owning the individual financial instruments.

In early May, I asked whether emerging small caps are safer than U.S. small stocks.

Of course, stock market investing comes with more risk than a safe, low - yield savings account.

The ability to reduce your cost basis like this — especially if it can be reduced below a key support level — is a great example of how a «10 % Trade» can be safer than a conventional stock trade.

«Buying a single company's stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.»

Investing in diversified funds is safER than buying individual company stocks.

Bonds did remarkably well over the last decade and they're seen as safer havens than stocks, particularly government bonds.