We might have to wait many years for a fully autonomous electric car from GM to hit the dealerships, in part because the technology still has to mature, but also because legislation isn't ready and it's not quite clear yet how fast - or slow - regulators will move on this (if it can be convincingly shown that it saves lives and is
safer than human drivers, things might go fast).
Templeton argues that once auto - drive systems are proved much
safer than human drivers, it may be downright immoral to let humans drive at all.
He asks, «Will people accept a self - driving car that is
safer than a human driver but that requires them to constantly monitor the automation in anticipation of the rare occasions when intervention will be necessary?»
Not exact matches
Additionally, self - driving car technology will be so good that these robotic automobiles will posses driving skills that «will be indistinguishable from
humans except that robot
drivers will be
safer and more predictable
than a
human driver with less
than one year's driving experience.»
Nevertheless, Khosrowshahi remains optimistic about the future of the program, asserting that «ultimately, self - driving cars will be
safer than humans,» but that right now, they're more like «student
drivers.»
In January, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said he expected Uber to roll out an autonomous ride - hailing service by mid-2019, but that timeline may be pushed back, as the company will have to provide reassurance that an autonomous ride - hailing service will be
safer for passengers and pedestrians
than one operated by
human drivers.
In 557 words, Tesla sought to counter that alarming photo, using statistics and figures to argue that an artificially intelligent
driver is still
safer than a
human one.
She's confident because her team forecast a future — actually lots of different futures — where self - driving cars hit the road when they were 10, 75 or 90 percent
safer than the average
human driver.
Since current self - driving safety assurances aren't exactly airtight, Koopman argues that self - driving cars should be held to a way higher standard
than human drivers — say, 10 times
safer than the average
human — before they're given the green light.
For starters, regulators will have to come up with a definition of «
safe» — whether that means the machines must drive flawlessly or simply break fewer laws and get into fewer accidents
than human drivers do.
It is a relatively
safe bet for driverless carmakers to say they will foot the bill for everything from fender benders to violent crashes because semiautonomy is showing that computer
drivers are likely
safer than human ones.
The
driver aid tech is starting to show its age — particularly the brake - based, rather
than steering - based, lane departure prevention system — but the QX80 still does a more
than adequate job of keeping its
human cargo
safe.
That frees to text and (not) drive, lets our GPS also be our
driver so we never get lost, and can be
safer than letting
humans take the wheel.
Tesla says that a diesel truck is 20 percent more expensive to run per mile, and that running an Autopilot - powered convoy of Semis is even more economical
than transporting cargo by rail, while also being 10 times
safer than having the vehicles manned by
human drivers.
Since current self - driving safety assurances aren't exactly airtight, Koopman argues that self - driving cars should be held to a way higher standard
than human drivers — say, 10 times
safer than the average
human — before they're given the green light.