It is a relatively safe bet for driverless carmakers to say they will foot the bill for everything from fender benders to violent crashes because semiautonomy is showing that computer drivers are likely
safer than human ones.
In 557 words, Tesla sought to counter that alarming photo, using statistics and figures to argue that an artificially intelligent driver is still
safer than a human one.
Not exact matches
Additionally, self - driving car technology will be so good that these robotic automobiles will posses driving skills that «will be indistinguishable from
humans except that robot drivers will be
safer and more predictable
than a
human driver with less
than one year's driving experience.»
If autonomous cars are
safer than human - driven
ones, the reasoning goes, we'll save more lives by bringing the technology to market as quickly as we can, even if there are a few fatal crashes along the way.
In January, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi said he expected Uber to roll out an autonomous ride - hailing service by mid-2019, but that timeline may be pushed back, as the company will have to provide reassurance that an autonomous ride - hailing service will be
safer for passengers and pedestrians
than one operated by
human drivers.
While proponents of autonomous vehicles believe they will be much
safer than those driven by
humans, they'll have to prove that Monday's accident and subsequent
ones are not the result of fundamental flaws in self - driving technology.
In this way, it is possible for an on - board computer to get a car closer to the
one in front at higher speeds
than would be considered
safe under
human control.
I'd rather think about her name
than think about how I'm going to keep her
safe out there... or maybe it's because we all know that, despite our best efforts, we can't prevent them from being bullied, or getting hurt, or just feeling the ups and downs of being
human... so we try to exert some control over the
one thing that we know will travel with them... maybe it's a little like trying to wrap them in a protective spell J
We have to show that driverless cars are
safer than human - driven
ones.
«We've been hearing about their potential for more
than a decade, but the results have always been in mice and rats, and no
one has shown they're
safe or effective in
humans long term,» says Robert Lanza of Advanced Cell Technology in Marlborough, Massachusetts, the company that carried out the stem cell intervention.
In
one piece, Orr writes that, «pipelines are much
safer than many other
human activities, including «
safe sex»».
Yes, it is also a pesticide, but a natural
one (and great at getting rid of ants - here's a great tutorial) but I'm yet to find conclusive evidence that it is either
safe or harmful to
humans (other
than if it is ingested, rubbed in the eyes, etc.).
It's undoubtable that, once fully sorted and tied into vehicle - to - vehicle and vehicle - to - grid communications systems, self - driving cars will be substantially
safer than most
human driven
ones.
The fact that some females forage close, and in
one case very close, to the Falklands suggests that there can be a direct interaction with
human activities (fisheries, oil exploration), and a greater local responsibility in securing a
safe future to SLI elephant seals
than previously expected.
One common error in most couples is that they get stuck in fighting about concrete situations, rather
than addressing their underlying universal
human need to feel
safe, liked, and cherished by their partner.