Not exact matches
I didn't see this applying to any legislative act, nor did I see that this was a conversation
about funding, The
case you are siting was a school system FORCING kids to
say a
particular prayer.
Speaking on BBC Radio Lincolnshire, Peter Tatchell
said: «He can't perhaps comment
about the individuality of that
particular case, but he certainly could comment on the principle, which is that he has, in the past, supported legal discrimination against gay people.
We can know we are telling the truth when we
say this, though we should always be uncertain
about judgment on any
particular case.
Without
saying that it is
particular religious acts or practices, such as prayer or the use of Scripture for guidance, that make one's function pastoral, I believe that a
case can be made for an identifiable pastoral function as well as a pastoral way of thinking
about that function.
«The inspiration was, what do I do
about this
particular case,» he
said.
She
said she plans to «talk
about the mistake that was made in that
particular case,» referring to Success Fort Greene.
Sometimes you have to try to give people frank comments and advice, and in this
particular case I did preface what I was
saying by
saying if they want to have a conversation
about a political matter as well as a personal matter it is confidential, and you do expect people to behave in a trustworthy way, which these people from the Daily Telegraph didn't.
«In this
particular case I don't think there is any dispute
about the source of infection,»
said a spokesman for South Birmingham Health Authority.
In fact, what he actually
said about animal sourced foods (in this
case, milk and beef) in that
particular video was that they're not a «good source» of nutrients b / c it isn't possible to get certain nutrients w / o the harmful doses of hormones and saturated fats (not to mention a bunch of other industrial toxins found in animal fat).
Again - there are some
cases in which the title makes sense - Girl Waits with Gun makes sense for this
particular book because it was an actual headline and it also
says something
about the era.
As I
said in my reply to Wegman, ordinarily I would agree with him that science shouldn't be conducted through blogs, but in the
case of climate science an opinion
about global warming in general, or the validity of multiproxy reconstructions or climate models in
particular seems to constitute for some a political viewpoint that must be either trumpeted from the rooftops or suppressed by any means possible regardless of its scientific merit.
In this
particular case, I think the demands for to defend things we hadn't
said occluded possible areas of agreement
about what we did
say.
Katzel
says that this is «analogous to the situation that we are in already as manager of AIG's legal spend, we collect a lot of data on market trends, so we can get an understanding across various industries across various clients
about what the median cost is to
say, litigate a primary causality
case in a
particular jurisdiction in the US — and that kind of market data across multiple clients in our network on an anonymized aggregate basis ultimately is meaningful for clients.»
You may make offers to each other and you may unburden yourselves to me
about the strengths and weaknesses of your
case, and
about your hopes and fears in relation to the litigation, secure in the knowledge that nothing
said today can be repeated in the outside world or, in
particular, in court if today's process does not lead to a settlement.»
Aaron Street: Yeah I mean I think this can be taken too far, so if you had an example like Brad where he only represents criminal defendants and therefore there's no risk of him having a conflict come through the site when he's getting actual information
about actual
cases, but you could see in a litigation, let's
say a family law lawyer, if their website were trying to collect information to provide tools as both an intake and access to justice solution that you potentially run into tremendous conflicts of interest problems there and I think obviously any lawyer considering pursuing this for their firm should think through the implications of their
particular situation, but I think what Brad's doing is awesome in the context of his criminal law practice and I think there are versions of a similar model that could be used in something like your debt collection defense practice or a small business startup practice or an estate planning practice, but that doesn't mean that it's a model that should be replicated by every lawyer in every practice.
«Attorneys will be able to use it to see how a court has dealt with
cases on a
particular topic or motion, what they key
cases are they should know
about, and the
particular rules, standards and language that are most important in that venue,» Lewis
said.
Since the law only
say that these factors are to be balanced and there are no instructions
about how that is done, one would need to retain an attorney to get a professional evaluation of the most likely outcome in a
particular case, if you really want to know.
One explanation for the difference in link rates is that posting
about Clark v. Rameker is really just a
case brief: readers need to know what this one
particular case says and how to deal with it.
A death penalty opponent, Feingold
said: «I found a person who actually thought
about it deeply, who was troubled by innocent people being sentenced to death, and who gave
particular concern to how those
cases were handled as a Court of Appeals judge.»
Anything that the Commission chooses to
say in the future
about how it exercises this power — in general or in
particular cases — would be extremely interesting.
Now, I don't want to get into the vagaries of how directories are compiled, but I think these
particular rankings are pretty accurate, and what that
says to me is that there is a degree of explaining to do — more so in some market segments than others —
about why a brand might choose to defer to a lesser or, in a few
cases, broadly equal one.
«I don't want to talk
about any
particular case and I am not representing Mr. Brown anymore on the CTV issue,»
says Lisus, a partner at Lax O'Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP in Toronto, who spoke to Legal Feeds after the event.
Like I
said in the first sentence, people are going apeshit especially
about this one
particular case.
For example, when a client asks for legal advice
about a
particular alimony option that is being discussed, an under - functioning lawyer might
say something like «it's up to you and your spouse» without advising the client
about how the spousal support statute works or what
case law suggests alimony might look like under the facts of the client's
case.
Were it the
case that TREB has been found: «Look, this is
about TREB controlling the way that the information is given out to restrict certain methods that the tribunal has
said are illegal,» — paying
particular to the word «ILLEGAL», why would the Tribunal be delaying or hedging its «specific terms» (decision) against what TREB may or may not be willing to acquiesce to?
Joffrey Long P.S. I should state here that nothing I
said represents an opinion
about, or relates in any way to any
particular case, or any matter previously, now or anticipated to appear in any arbitration, court proceeding, mediation, or other legal proceeding.