He quoted a bunch of things I'd
said about atheism.
«And that is what some people
say about atheism, too.
I have a lot of things to
say about Atheism (and about fake judgmental self - righteous Christians as well, there are a ton of them) but there's no space here.
Not exact matches
Atheism as you yourself are pointing out
says nothing
about ethics.
There is much that could be
said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at
about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that
atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of
atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of
atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of
atheism, they prove that their
atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving
atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
Atheism says: don't waste your life dreaming
about rewards after death.
And TO the people that
says religion is the cause of wars, plz stop it, how
about all the wars from
atheism?
You
said I don't know anything
about hard or soft
atheism, an assumption on you're part so tell me what is it to you?
Actually Jesus you're wrong
about what
Atheism said, prayer changes things by not doing anything and allowing the natural (disastrous) course of events to transpire.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he
said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking
about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how
Atheism does not fit into the
said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
They know so much
about Christianity than Christians they
say but next to nothing
about Atheism.
Atheism says absolutely NOTHING
about the cause, nature and purpose of universe, mankind or purposeness.
What you
said was that I was wrong and then you incorrectly made claims
about where «
atheism» stood on these issues.
I think my question to those of you who couple
atheism with evolution and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you
about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we
say is a blasphemous lie?
I think my question to those of you who couple evil
atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you
about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we
say is a blasphemous lie?
Atheism is simply a lack of belief in god and
says nothing
about how we raise our children (other than implying that we don't brain - wash them with religious indoctrination).
Dalahast; you
said «I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and
atheism provide examples of lay persons talking
about a science they don't fully comprehend.»
Those who are Buddhists will follow one set of laws, secular humanists on, Utilitarians on, Unitarian Universalists one (with a lot of variation), etc. «
Atheism» in itself
says nothing at all
about one's ethical beliefs.
The nicest thing I can
say to you is that you are completely and totally ignorant
about what
atheism is, not to mention, ignorant
about what science
says about our creation.
its not really
atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you
say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking
about, you assume to know what something is
about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its
about being aware of who you are?
Atheism simply has nothing to
say about gods.
You
said «Question # 1 Explain to me
about atheism.
We don't
say there are six types of Theists, we focus on the Religions, and that is what is missing — a modern Religion / Belief system for Atheists — as
Atheism does not mean without rules, just
about whether God exists or not.
Not all atheist are created equal just like all Christians are not the same so before you
say things like «
atheism is so sad», please consider that you really do not know what you are talking
about and it is not your place to judge how I think or feel.
So when your talking
about Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc. it wasn't their
atheism that made them do the evil things they did any more than
say their lack in the belief in unicorns.
If you are trying to weaken the legitimacy
atheism by calling it just another belief system, what does that
say about the legitimacy of your own beliefs?
One Atheist
said: «Calling
Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color However, atheists make such claims so
Atheism can avoid legal imperatives placed on religions in many countries, and can avoid some of the ideological hang - ups people have
about «religion».
Jay I'm not talking
about atheism; what I'm
saying is that critics of evolution don't actually read any real books by actual scientists
about the subject.
Atheism says nothing
about where we came from.
Or what Einstein
said about god (though he feel more in line with
atheism)?
In his speech to the crowd, Stiefel talked
about what he sees as the most important problem facing
atheism: «Discrimination comes from ignorance, and in this case it is ignorance
about our beliefs,» he
said.
that does not include
atheism i hope all atheists would die and be reincarnated as tree's that are then cut down to print «Quran's and bible's on =D that would be awesome that being
said i do nt beleive god (meaning the «one» god that is in many religions) would condem postponing your fast untill after the games ive never put much stock in what so called holly men have to
say its all
about your perseption of your holy book
what's absolutely hilarious
about this is that there is literally no point to becoming an Atheist in terms of benefit, what has
Atheism ever contributed, maybe you can
say the same
about religions but i just don't believe your going to «convert» people to
Atheism there is no reward, no promise, and no hope, its basically like yea we are all in trouble lets all believe it together, people already know that
Atheism doesn't need to tell them, stop destroyed people's hope
Atheism on the other hand was put up by a gay person who didn't like what God
said about it being a filthy thing.
First,
atheism doesn't
say anything
about the origin of the universe or life.
These associations
say nothing
about whether
atheism leads to positive social indicators or the other way around.
Atheism doesn't
say anything
about the origins of the universe or life.
Let's pause for a brief summary: We
said there are three basic hypotheses
about God —
atheism, pantheism, theism.
You
say that
Atheism doesn't exist, but then turn right around and talk
about how it is wrong.
And then to have people
say we can't talk
about that athlete's
atheism?
The overwhelming majority (71 - 75 %)
said that in each case it would make no difference, but slightly more people were likely to view Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband more positively due to their
atheism than negatively, while
about the same number of people viewed David Cameron more positively than more negatively due to his membership of the Church of England.
Wunderman goes where few writers have dared in exploring the difficult subjects of communism and
atheism (as she
says in her interview at BookBrowse she didn't set out to write
about these subjects per se but wanted her characters to be truly shunned by the community without making them perverts or criminals).