Not exact matches
«Trump gave an interview to explain it
was his decision to fire Comey, contradicting every
argument his team had
made on his behalf,» Meyers
said on Thursday's «Late Night.»
Earlier this year, Wall Street Journal editor Gerard Baker
made a similar
argument,
saying the word lie «implies much more than just
saying something that
's false.
«
Be truthful and use previous experience to
make the
argument as to why you
're the right fit for the role,» she
says.
Make the
argument as to why you
're a fit based on what you learned in the interview rather than what it
says in the job description.
Clark
said Vancouver
is «actively lobbying» for the RMB centre and believes it
makes the better
argument over its Toronto competitor.
«Depending on how the targeting
is happening, you can
make potentially different sorts of
arguments about whether or not Google or Facebook or LinkedIn
is contributing to the development» of the ad,
said Deirdre K. Mulligan, a faculty director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology.
Klepper
said he noticed while covering Trump rallies that the information, language, and
arguments that people
were making had less in common with Fox News and more in common with Breitbart News and even the conspiracy - peddling Infowars.
While the attack Thursday
was the first of its kind by the US, Lowther
said the bomb
was «not even close to
being a nuclear weapon» and he would «not
make the
argument that it
's a symbol of escalation» in the conflict in Afghanistan.
Trump's latest comments appeared to undermine the
argument being made by Cohen lawyers, who
say their client
was Trump's personal attorney first and foremost, and therefore, practically everything Cohen did
was protected by attorney - client privilege.
In fact, there
's an
argument to
be made — as Dennis Berman does at the Wall Street Journal — that the Verizon bid for AOL
says more about Verizon
's difficulties than it does about any intrinsic value that its target might have.
In future, the sharks» appetites might even
make people safer: Stingrays injure beachgoers on California
's coast far more frequently than white sharks do, Lowe
says, though he acknowledges that
's a hard
argument to sell to a shark - phobic public.
There
's still a chance to do something effective, Johnson
says, but it will require a strong and independent Consumer Financial Protection Agency and the dismantling of the six American banks that have grown too big to fail — and if he isn't the first to
make the
argument, 13 Bankers nonetheless lends it a good deal of substance.
You could certainly
make the
argument that they operate one of the largest ad networks in the world and that network
is predicated on
being able to track people,» Maier
said.
«The ability to have folks who can speak that language, help develop
arguments and
make that case
is a helpful approach for a company like AWS to
be able to sell their services,» Alexander
says.
To
make the
argument that Quebec judges do it, why can't you,
is like the kid who grows up on a country club
saying «I can play polo, why can't you?»
Canadian Press reported that Harper
said: «Regarding sexual orientation or, more accurately, what we
are really talking about, sexual behaviour, the
argument has
been made.
Canadian Press reported that Harper
said: «Regarding sexual orientation or, more accurately, what we
are really talking about, sexual behaviour, the
argument has
been made... that this
is analogous to race and ethnicity.
Asked which province — B.C., which wants to delay the project for environmental reasons, or Alberta, which wants to avoid delays for economic reasons —
is making the more compelling
argument, Canadians
are evenly split, with 50 per cent
saying each province's government
is more persuasive
Saying bitcoin
is physical
is a difficult
argument to
make, regardless of the demand for bitcoin.»
«Although the FIA providers have the strongest irreparable harm
argument of all providers impacted by the fiduciary rule, Judge Moss» questioning in the grueling three - hour - long hearing suggested that he
is likely to deny the injunction and uphold the fiduciary rule on the grounds that NAFA
was unable to
make the required irreparable harm showing,» she
said.
Bayer
said in a statement that it doesn't control the cost for patients at the pharmacy, because copays
are determined by insurers and pharmacy - benefit managers — an
argument that pharmaceuticals companies have long
made when facing criticism over drug prices.
Instead, when you
make this
argument to people about Singapore, lots of people go, «Oh, but it
's a small island Asian country,» they start
saying, «But, you shouldn't look at it,» and I
'm like, «Really?
Crowe: You could certainly
make that
argument, but if you
're looking from a growth pipeline perspective, you could even
say that Spectra has more upside simply because their development portfolio has remained robust throughout the entire time, whereas Kinder Morgan over these past couple quarters has actually
been trimming their backlog.
«Part of our Sector Weight thesis longer term has
been the view that at some point, investors might start to care that a significant portion... of the company'
s gross profit pool
was no longer growing, and so while investors largely care about Model 3 for the moment, that
S / X continue to point toward these trends
makes multiple expansion
arguments more challenging,» analysts Elliot Arnson and Brad Erickson
said in a Wednesday note.
«The Disney story
is probably a bellwether, because you can
make the
argument that ESPN
is the most successful cable brand on the planet,»
said Tim Hanlon, founder and CEO of Vertere, a media advisory firm.
Politicians who advocate for more bitumen pipelines and LNG exports
are making a «have your cake and eat it too
argument» because there
is no way Canada can meet its climate change commitments under such a scenario
says David Hughes, one of the nation's top energy experts.
If the economy and earnings growth
were poised to accelerate meaningfully and consistently over the next 18 months, we could
make an
argument that current market levels
are «fair,» but that
is not what our analysis suggest,» he
said.
«Certainly, the
argument that the government will
make is that the $ 130,000 payment from Michael Cohen to Daniels
was a loan to the Trump campaign to keep these allegations secret obviously and then Trump paying Cohen back would
be a campaign expenditure» — a loan and expenditure that should have
been disclosed to the Federal Election Commission, he
said.
To
make gains among these voters, Republicans needed to
make detailed (but pithy)
arguments about what
was wrong with Obamacare and the benefits of Republican health care policy X (read National Affairs to get an idea of some of the things they could have
said), and do so in plain language.
But selling these positions within the black community
is made infinitely more difficult when my black critics
are able to
say, «But your
argument plays into the hands of those who
are looking for an excuse to abandon the black poor,» and I find myself unable credibly to contradict them.
For example there
is no reasonable
argument to
be made from a secular viewpoint to oppose gay marriage that can not
be said to oppose hetero marriage as well.
You
said, «It
's like you change things or
make things up as you go along to suit the
argument you
're making at the time.»
But again per my own
argument being a Catholic did not
make Hitler a mass murderer and anyone who
says that Catholicism
makes you a mass murderer
is as irrational as you
are.
And those that don't
say that stuff instead opting to argue and dissect and article or
argument for / about god doesn't show they
make any positive claims to the existence of such a
being, but instead to show how ridiculous and irrational somethings
are.
My experience in
being a team member and leading teams tells me that it just takes one loud voice to ruin an otherwise convivial gathering and that
making things good for everyone requires satarising any pretentiousness and deconstructing any evil
argument in order to render
said loud voice powerless.
Regardless, it
's not as nice to have the frame of a well
made argument dismissed as irrelevant when I didn't quote scripture or
say I'd pray for you, right?
You
said, «To discount The Bible as merely a «fairy tale», or deny the life of Jesus just doesn't cut it without ANY counter-evidence, so you
make the convenient
argument for yourself that there
is no evidence to counter.
So here we have «Chuck» (aka Mark) pretending nothing
was said, no proofs given, no
arguments made, so he can pat himself on the back for «denying» the truth and taking (I suppose) some of the sting of losing away with him.
Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our
being created male and female, but shouldn't they
be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of
saying, «We believe the tradition
made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even
make our
argument for inclusion»?
If as you
say, «two wrongs [don't]
make a right
argument» then why not debate @Blarg's statement instead of inciting atheists condemnation of his / her
arguments by indirectly
making a blanket statement about how Atheist should
be offended?
Maggie Gallagher has
been making eloquent, sophisticated
arguments proving simple (some would
say self - evident) truths for years now: Marriage
is good for spouses, children, and society at large; or, in her words, married people
are happier, healthier, and better off financially.
Indeed, I think that a cogent
argument can
be made for the necessity of something like the Catholic magisterium — a divinely assisted authority that has the «final
say» in fundamental questions of interpretation.
To
say that it will never
be forgiven as long as they don't believe removes all the force from Jesus» warning, and
makes His
argument redundantly self - evident.
Therefore, the statement «even the demons believe, and tremble»
is NOT from James, and
is NOT in support of his
argument, but
is from someone who does not like what James
is saying, and
is objecting to the point James
is making.
«I
was attacking the
argument that gay people must
be discriminated against — and anti-bullying programs that address anti-gay bullying should
be blocked (or exceptions should
be made for bullying «motivated by faith»)-- because it
says right there in the Bible that
being gay
is wrong.»
(CNN)- A Catholic hospital in hot water for claiming in a Colorado court that a fetus
is not a person backtracked on Monday,
saying it
was «morally wrong» to
make the
argument while defending itself in a wrongful death lawsuit.
But such
arguments make little headway with socialists,
says Novak, because, contrary to appearances, socialism
is not really a practical political proposal at all.
You have yet to directly respond to the specific points I've
made at least three times now, i.e.: 1) the immutable good nature
argument is simply unsupported definitional fiat (god can
be equally described as malevolent or apathetic with equal support); 2) the immutable good nature
argument presents a source of morality beyond god's direct control placing the
argument in the god
says so because it
is good prong of the dilemma; and 3) the
argument suggests god
is not omnipotent because god
is constrained to only a limited set of potential behaviors.
In that case, a second
argument would need to
be mounted to show that the exegesis really supports the generalizations
made about what the text
says.
he
's saying nothing bad about h.omos.exuals, but i just showed you a passage where christians
are told to kill g.ays - see how that
makes his
argument pretty ridiculous?