Sentences with phrase «said argument is made»

Not exact matches

«Trump gave an interview to explain it was his decision to fire Comey, contradicting every argument his team had made on his behalf,» Meyers said on Thursday's «Late Night.»
Earlier this year, Wall Street Journal editor Gerard Baker made a similar argument, saying the word lie «implies much more than just saying something that's false.
«Be truthful and use previous experience to make the argument as to why you're the right fit for the role,» she says.
Make the argument as to why you're a fit based on what you learned in the interview rather than what it says in the job description.
Clark said Vancouver is «actively lobbying» for the RMB centre and believes it makes the better argument over its Toronto competitor.
«Depending on how the targeting is happening, you can make potentially different sorts of arguments about whether or not Google or Facebook or LinkedIn is contributing to the development» of the ad, said Deirdre K. Mulligan, a faculty director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology.
Klepper said he noticed while covering Trump rallies that the information, language, and arguments that people were making had less in common with Fox News and more in common with Breitbart News and even the conspiracy - peddling Infowars.
While the attack Thursday was the first of its kind by the US, Lowther said the bomb was «not even close to being a nuclear weapon» and he would «not make the argument that it's a symbol of escalation» in the conflict in Afghanistan.
Trump's latest comments appeared to undermine the argument being made by Cohen lawyers, who say their client was Trump's personal attorney first and foremost, and therefore, practically everything Cohen did was protected by attorney - client privilege.
In fact, there's an argument to be made — as Dennis Berman does at the Wall Street Journal — that the Verizon bid for AOL says more about Verizon's difficulties than it does about any intrinsic value that its target might have.
In future, the sharks» appetites might even make people safer: Stingrays injure beachgoers on California's coast far more frequently than white sharks do, Lowe says, though he acknowledges that's a hard argument to sell to a shark - phobic public.
There's still a chance to do something effective, Johnson says, but it will require a strong and independent Consumer Financial Protection Agency and the dismantling of the six American banks that have grown too big to fail — and if he isn't the first to make the argument, 13 Bankers nonetheless lends it a good deal of substance.
You could certainly make the argument that they operate one of the largest ad networks in the world and that network is predicated on being able to track people,» Maier said.
«The ability to have folks who can speak that language, help develop arguments and make that case is a helpful approach for a company like AWS to be able to sell their services,» Alexander says.
To make the argument that Quebec judges do it, why can't you, is like the kid who grows up on a country club saying «I can play polo, why can't you?»
Canadian Press reported that Harper said: «Regarding sexual orientation or, more accurately, what we are really talking about, sexual behaviour, the argument has been made.
Canadian Press reported that Harper said: «Regarding sexual orientation or, more accurately, what we are really talking about, sexual behaviour, the argument has been made... that this is analogous to race and ethnicity.
Asked which province — B.C., which wants to delay the project for environmental reasons, or Alberta, which wants to avoid delays for economic reasons — is making the more compelling argument, Canadians are evenly split, with 50 per cent saying each province's government is more persuasive
Saying bitcoin is physical is a difficult argument to make, regardless of the demand for bitcoin.»
«Although the FIA providers have the strongest irreparable harm argument of all providers impacted by the fiduciary rule, Judge Moss» questioning in the grueling three - hour - long hearing suggested that he is likely to deny the injunction and uphold the fiduciary rule on the grounds that NAFA was unable to make the required irreparable harm showing,» she said.
Bayer said in a statement that it doesn't control the cost for patients at the pharmacy, because copays are determined by insurers and pharmacy - benefit managers — an argument that pharmaceuticals companies have long made when facing criticism over drug prices.
Instead, when you make this argument to people about Singapore, lots of people go, «Oh, but it's a small island Asian country,» they start saying, «But, you shouldn't look at it,» and I'm like, «Really?
Crowe: You could certainly make that argument, but if you're looking from a growth pipeline perspective, you could even say that Spectra has more upside simply because their development portfolio has remained robust throughout the entire time, whereas Kinder Morgan over these past couple quarters has actually been trimming their backlog.
«Part of our Sector Weight thesis longer term has been the view that at some point, investors might start to care that a significant portion... of the company's gross profit pool was no longer growing, and so while investors largely care about Model 3 for the moment, that S / X continue to point toward these trends makes multiple expansion arguments more challenging,» analysts Elliot Arnson and Brad Erickson said in a Wednesday note.
«The Disney story is probably a bellwether, because you can make the argument that ESPN is the most successful cable brand on the planet,» said Tim Hanlon, founder and CEO of Vertere, a media advisory firm.
Politicians who advocate for more bitumen pipelines and LNG exports are making a «have your cake and eat it too argument» because there is no way Canada can meet its climate change commitments under such a scenario says David Hughes, one of the nation's top energy experts.
If the economy and earnings growth were poised to accelerate meaningfully and consistently over the next 18 months, we could make an argument that current market levels are «fair,» but that is not what our analysis suggest,» he said.
«Certainly, the argument that the government will make is that the $ 130,000 payment from Michael Cohen to Daniels was a loan to the Trump campaign to keep these allegations secret obviously and then Trump paying Cohen back would be a campaign expenditure» — a loan and expenditure that should have been disclosed to the Federal Election Commission, he said.
To make gains among these voters, Republicans needed to make detailed (but pithy) arguments about what was wrong with Obamacare and the benefits of Republican health care policy X (read National Affairs to get an idea of some of the things they could have said), and do so in plain language.
But selling these positions within the black community is made infinitely more difficult when my black critics are able to say, «But your argument plays into the hands of those who are looking for an excuse to abandon the black poor,» and I find myself unable credibly to contradict them.
For example there is no reasonable argument to be made from a secular viewpoint to oppose gay marriage that can not be said to oppose hetero marriage as well.
You said, «It's like you change things or make things up as you go along to suit the argument you're making at the time.»
But again per my own argument being a Catholic did not make Hitler a mass murderer and anyone who says that Catholicism makes you a mass murderer is as irrational as you are.
And those that don't say that stuff instead opting to argue and dissect and article or argument for / about god doesn't show they make any positive claims to the existence of such a being, but instead to show how ridiculous and irrational somethings are.
My experience in being a team member and leading teams tells me that it just takes one loud voice to ruin an otherwise convivial gathering and that making things good for everyone requires satarising any pretentiousness and deconstructing any evil argument in order to render said loud voice powerless.
Regardless, it's not as nice to have the frame of a well made argument dismissed as irrelevant when I didn't quote scripture or say I'd pray for you, right?
You said, «To discount The Bible as merely a «fairy tale», or deny the life of Jesus just doesn't cut it without ANY counter-evidence, so you make the convenient argument for yourself that there is no evidence to counter.
So here we have «Chuck» (aka Mark) pretending nothing was said, no proofs given, no arguments made, so he can pat himself on the back for «denying» the truth and taking (I suppose) some of the sting of losing away with him.
Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»?
If as you say, «two wrongs [don't] make a right argument» then why not debate @Blarg's statement instead of inciting atheists condemnation of his / her arguments by indirectly making a blanket statement about how Atheist should be offended?
Maggie Gallagher has been making eloquent, sophisticated arguments proving simple (some would say self - evident) truths for years now: Marriage is good for spouses, children, and society at large; or, in her words, married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially.
Indeed, I think that a cogent argument can be made for the necessity of something like the Catholic magisterium — a divinely assisted authority that has the «final say» in fundamental questions of interpretation.
To say that it will never be forgiven as long as they don't believe removes all the force from Jesus» warning, and makes His argument redundantly self - evident.
Therefore, the statement «even the demons believe, and tremble» is NOT from James, and is NOT in support of his argument, but is from someone who does not like what James is saying, and is objecting to the point James is making.
«I was attacking the argument that gay people must be discriminated against — and anti-bullying programs that address anti-gay bullying should be blocked (or exceptions should be made for bullying «motivated by faith»)-- because it says right there in the Bible that being gay is wrong.»
(CNN)- A Catholic hospital in hot water for claiming in a Colorado court that a fetus is not a person backtracked on Monday, saying it was «morally wrong» to make the argument while defending itself in a wrongful death lawsuit.
But such arguments make little headway with socialists, says Novak, because, contrary to appearances, socialism is not really a practical political proposal at all.
You have yet to directly respond to the specific points I've made at least three times now, i.e.: 1) the immutable good nature argument is simply unsupported definitional fiat (god can be equally described as malevolent or apathetic with equal support); 2) the immutable good nature argument presents a source of morality beyond god's direct control placing the argument in the god says so because it is good prong of the dilemma; and 3) the argument suggests god is not omnipotent because god is constrained to only a limited set of potential behaviors.
In that case, a second argument would need to be mounted to show that the exegesis really supports the generalizations made about what the text says.
he's saying nothing bad about h.omos.exuals, but i just showed you a passage where christians are told to kill g.ays - see how that makes his argument pretty ridiculous?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z