Sentences with phrase «said claims then»
the only real control one has is the outward interactions with others and if those who claim to hold to a moral code show a lack of understanding on said claims then it is the duty of those seekers of truth to right the wrongs committed in the names of others by ignorant fools.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
Citing several examples, including Trump's inauguration crowd - size claims, Comey continued: «Sometimes he's lying in ways that are obvious, sometimes he's saying things that we may not know are true or false and then there's a spectrum in between.»
Then on Friday, Greta Van Susteren followed suit, saying she too regrets not believing her former colleague Gretchen Carlson's now - settled sexual harassment claims against ex-Fox News CEO Roger Ailes.
Bowman says there's a developing body of case law around people who have claimed personal injury for insurance and then, when they're supposed to be bedridden, have posted photos of themselves doing something physical, like skiing.
«People are entitled to their own opinion, but they are not entitled to their own facts,» Merrill said, then detailing some of the voter fraud claims.
If the Stone Street claims aren't allowed, then «making distributions totaling one hundred percent of the base claims in this case is a reasonable possibility,» Grier said in an affidavit.
Rather, she resigned because she had «inadvertently misled» lawmakers about the deportation targets — first by claiming they didn't exist, and then by saying she wasn't aware of their existence.
The techniques include claiming outrageous statements were jokes or misunderstandings; saying and doing things and then denying it; blaming others for misunderstanding their intent; disparaging others» concerns as over-sensitivity; and other forms of twilighting the truth.
Ryan then claimed that Sanders was «blindsided» by Rudy Guiliani's interview last night on Fox News in which he said that Trump reimbursed $ 130,000 to Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen for his payment to Stormy Daniels.
«This settlement involves claims dating back to July 2013 and, while we are continually improving as a company, we have proactively made a lot of changes since then,» the spokesperson said in a statement.
Or do you get to just make claims, have them proven wrong, backpedel and say thats not what you meant, then present a new idea you think science will never be able to prove only to be proven wrong almost before it's out of your mouth.
claiming how one side is angry because of the comments is fine except where you then end up saying..
You claim the that magic and miracles are ridiculous and then you try to say that science uses them when it is religion that makes use of them.
That you can say such a thing and then claim to be a respectful human being staggers and disgusts me.
Like I said in my first response, when you have something actually interesting, relevant and evidence to actually back up your claim, then we'll talk.
Now I realize that for atheists that probably won't be any more believable, but if you're going to say «the bible said...» while mocking it for being unbelievable then you should at least make sure it actually says what you're claiming.
So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».
If you claim to be a «Christian» then I think you should look hard in the mirror and ask yourself... «what did Jesus say about this?»
Saying that is like saying that if we destroyed all the textbooks and anyone who claimed to personally have met George Washington or talked about him, then he would not Saying that is like saying that if we destroyed all the textbooks and anyone who claimed to personally have met George Washington or talked about him, then he would not saying that if we destroyed all the textbooks and anyone who claimed to personally have met George Washington or talked about him, then he would not exist.
If you normally claim that the «government» is not to be trusted and should not have a say in our personal lives, but then claim that the «government» should be able to make decisions regarding pregnancy for women, then you must be a «Christian Conservative».
If as you say you have talked to others who claim to be Atheist the way you describe it then they are IDIOTS who also don't understand Atheism and yes at that point since they are claiming «no God» to be true, then by all means call their point of view a «religion».
Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
If modern Christians have a sense of martyrdom as you claim then please feel free to debate them in the here and now... I don't hear a lot of Christians saying «you can't say / do this because 2,000 years ago Rome was busy killing us.»
SInce you clearly have some loose screws, you keep directing people to your website, then call them morons for going, then say do your own work, but if I do you claim I am a moron.
What you said was that I was wrong and then you incorrectly made claims about where «atheism» stood on these issues.
I am saying all this to inform others that it is a slippery slope claiming to hear the audible voice of God and then go around bragging about it.
If you're going to claim that we need an objective reason to evaluate morals against, I would then say that no one has this objective standard until they demonstrate that they do.
It is said that if this revelation descended on a mountain it would shatter, can any created being then can claim that he is like Muhammad s?
If you can't then, as I said, it is only reasonable to assume the moral absolutes you claim exist are also subjectively obtained and therefore, not objective, not absolute and not divine.
the claims of some of you on this post in saying Mormons are not Christian, I ask you to define or clarify what makes a person a christian, if it is a belief in Jesus Christ that he is the only way people can be saved, then Mormons are Christians.
I think what he is trying to say is that believers claim that if atheists don't believe in God then why do they call God evil?
Think about how silly that claim really is, all the native Americans decide to become Hindu and then take over a large part of India, what would we look like supporting them even if they produce a book that says their God Vishnu give them that land?
i did read page 2 and i know what im talking about you obiosly do nt because you all think hitler was a christian and he wasnt because im a christian and i know for a fact christians do nt act like that you can claim it all youd like but you should of read more up on history and if you think hitler was a christian your wrong because even if he said he was a christian then he wasnt a real one
After all, if you trust that what your faith says is actually the truth, then you believe that you already know the truth, so how can you sincerely claim to be seeking it?
I don't claim there is no god, I just say «prove it», then I'll «believe it».
For example, if I said JFK lived in the White House, staved off the Cuban Missile crisis, and could levitate and turn water into wine at will — then my proving that the White House really existed and the Cuban Missile crisis really happened is NOT evidence of the claim JFK could levitate or turn water into wine.
(Paul Ricoeur) Ricoeur claims that if we try to show the causes of, say, the rise of Nazism, then the responsibility of...
Even if one accepts the claim that memory is an experience of the past, this is rather like saying that if we define dog as a four - legged mammal, then all horses are dogs.
Dala, you are just what you claim not to be, by the fact that you say so, and then saying that others are.
By saying there is no room for «personal salvation» in your understanding of Jesus» teaching and then claiming that personal salvation gets us to the topic of atonement theory — what was it that you were wanting to say if not making a link between atonement theory and salvation?
Let me summarize You made the claim» The laws of motion say it's impossible for the sun and moon to suddenly STOP in their orbit and then resume.
We who proclaim Christ ought to have enough faith that our Lord is what we claim him to be, to permit such men and women to have, if not full then some limited, participation in Christian life in the community of faith; for we are confident, or we should be confident if we really believe what we say about Jesus, that such fellowship with him in the company of his people will lead them more and more deeply into the true significance of his person.
However the NIV inserts a word not in the Greek, so 4:6 reads «this is why the Gospel was preached even to those who are now dead...» The translators admit the «now» is not in the Greek but say that they put it there to make clear that the passage doesn't refer to post mortem opportunity which they claim is ruled out by Hebrews 9:27 «it is appointed unto to man once to die and then comes judgement».
If he is who he claimed to be, if he did rise from the dead, then we can choose to believe him when he says that this life is not the end.
I started out saying that if someone claims to be having a real relationship with a god in their head with real conversations then they are delusional about that issue (not in general, but about that phenomena).
As a Christian pastor, I am tired of apologizing for those who claim to speak on God's behalf and then say such unloving, unintelligent, and ignorant things as this, but.
And as long as you advertise a community and then charge a fee — and somehow claim you aren't doing that — I feel the need to say something.
Similarly, if — like Jonah — we claim to worship and fear God, but do not do what God says, then although we may believe many right and good things about God, and though we may have faith that rivals that of Abraham, our faith is useless and pointless.
If he was not / is not who he claimed to be then, as C.S. Lewis so sagely said, he must be a liar or a lunatic.
The problem is, if Santorum claimed he could not sin then he is a liar according to the BIBLE, for 1 John 1:8 says «If we claim to be without sin, we decieve ourselves and the truth is not in us.»