Not exact matches
He spoke
in response to a
question about an earlier Seattle Times story
saying that Clayton trapped borrowers into unaffordable
loans on depreciating homes.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is
in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more
questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis...
in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but
in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest
in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and
loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie
in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base...
in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player
in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)...
in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did
in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this
in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players
in the final third... he was never a good defensive player
in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely
in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means
saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)...
in their places we need to bring
in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model
in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically
in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking
in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
nice tribute andy and no doubts he has been the player of the year, although i cant understand him being criticised early on because hes been an international from an early age and a regular with cameroon and i distinctly remember him putting
in strong performances when on
loan at a struggling charlton a few seasons ago... i guess he has become the example of why we shud be patient with the younger players and give them the time that has no doubt benfited him i remember reading an article from him after the city game when adebayour had his little outburst and i cudnt believe how dedicated to the club and fans he was when
questioned bout his «friend» adebayour
saying arsenal and the fans are his priority and dat is all i cant understand people wanting cameroon to fail just so we can get him back early after the commitment he has shown to us but if he maintains his form we wont see anytime soon!goodluck song and cameroon
He took
questions from Mirabile on the third day of the trial examining an alleged corruption scheme that prosecutors
say involved Mangano, his wife, Linda, and Venditto accepting a «stream of benefits»
in exchange for county contracts and town - linked
loans to Singh.
When
questioned, the PM
said he did not think Dromey had revealed details of his lack of involvement
in the handling of the private
loans to undermine or implicate either the PM or 10 Downing Street.
It's the connection between the two that Antonacci
says in a 34 - page audit brings up a lot of
questions — including uncertainty about a $ 200,000
loan from the county to the entity that runs the film hub.
Somehow, they managed to add an addition 5 - 10k to the
loan, running me
in circles because i was asking the same
question «I do nt see the trade
in value for the car» to which they consistently answered me back
saying, «we paid the
loan off, its here» that wasn't my
question.
But even aside from all that, I think the clearest answer to your
question is what I
said above:
in general, it benefits the lender to attach conditions and parameters to
loans in order to have many opportunities to penalize the borrower for making it hard for the lender to predict their cash flow.
That being
said, I would imagine that things like high utilization and late payments (on any credit or
loan, not just the one
in question) would be the biggest things that would trigger this.
Now my
question is Since BANK release fund to builder
in phased manner, shall I go ahead n book the home
loan of 32lakhs now and as I told you after 6 month when my PL «ll b 12 months older I can reduce the EMI to let
say 10 - 12k, hence my home eligibility increases.
-- Experts
say they're a headache, issuers rarely offer it, yet the co-signed credit card may be making a comeback as a more - regulated industry searches for lost profits... (more) 4
questions to ask before you co-sign on a credit card — Explore alternatives and find out what you're
in for with these
questions for anyone who asks you to be a co-signer on a credit car or other
loan... (more) Issuer of 79.9 percent interest rate credit card defends its product — Subprime credit card marketers are looking for ways around new restrictions on sky - high fees for bad credit cards.
Ignoring the issue
in the original
question about later paying off the
loan through a gift, let's
say I make an interest free
loan to someone, with the genuine intention that they pay it back
in full at some later date, and with no intention of cheating the tax system.
In the discussion around this
question about gift tax it was
said that a
loan must be at market rate, or it is not considered a
loan.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, when discussing the student
loan crisis
in early March, acknowledged that the student
loan debt crisis is primarily an issue for Congress, and
said it could become an economic
question.
I am
in a repayment hardship program already but the Dept. of Education still starting taking 225 a month from my Social Security check... I am on a fixed income and thought that when I started the hardship repayment program that
in 9 months I could redo my
loans but the Dept. of Education started taking 225 out of my Social Security check
in addition to my already paying monthly on the hardship program... I call them and they
said I could file a form but that they will still take it out of my check for 3 more months... my
question is that why the hell did I even start the repayment program if they are still going to make it impossible to live....
The CFPB
said that while the practice isn't necessarily violating any laws, it does raise
questions when borrowers are stymied
in their attempts to have their co-signers released from their student
loans.
Nicole Litvak, a solar analyst at GTM Research
in Boston,
said there's no
question that the widening availability of solar leases and
loans is driving dramatic growth
in the residential space.
The
questioning of Rajiv Kochhar, ICICI Bank MD and CEO Chanda Kochhar's brother -
in - law, by the CBI started on the third consecutive day today
in connection with the banks Rs 3,250 crore
loan to Videocon Group
in 2012, officials here
said.
«Borrowers should seek a range of information, but each source should be vetted thoroughly,»
says Greg Cook, a senior
loan officer with Platinum Home Mortgage
in Temecula, Calif. «Borrowers should remember that the right answers to their
questions are often determined by the specifics of their individual situation.»
«One of the first
questions I asked was whether they were eligible for a VA home
loan — a
question I learned to ask immediately
in the MRP class,»
says Jones.
Smaller life insurance companies that typically originate $ 1 million to $ 3 million
in whole
loans per year have begun to
question the wisdom of continuing to offer such
loans, Hadley
said.
The
question is what happens
in the second half of the year, as 2006 was back - end loaded with new
loans and 2007 was front - end loaded,
says Sansosti.