Sentences with phrase «said means nothing to»

First let's explain how what you said means nothing to me example.

you believers babble on about nothing, get angry when non-Christians tell you your «scriptures» or your view of what Jesus (supposedly) said mean nothing to us.

if they do not follow your particular version of your religion then what you say means nothing to them — nor should it mean anything.

One farmer said this meant nothing to him, could she provide a location with a similar climate now.

Not exact matches

These days, I've gotten to a weird point, where — I mean, I've been doing it for like, seven years, so I sometimes feel like I have nothing left to say.

Trump denied ties to the Russian government or investors to CBS4 Miami and said, «I mean I have nothing to do with Russia.

«Ted Cruz will stop at nothing to weasel his way into power, even if it means weaponizing stolen information to manipulate people to like him,» Texas Democratic Party deputy executive director Manny Garcia said in a news release.

To say it means nothing today is to say, «this time is different.&raquTo say it means nothing today is to say, «this time is different.&raquto say, «this time is different.»

I keep meaning to move into index funds but I want to read up a bit on a few things first because I, like you, don't want 100 % in, say, an S&P index fund and nothing else.

«He's an egomaniac devoid of all moral sense» ---- said the society woman dressing for a charity bazaar, who dared not contemplate what means of self - expression would be left to her and how she would impose her ostentation on her friends, if charity were not the all - excusing virtue ---- said the social worker who had found no aim in life and could generate no aim from within the sterility of his soul, but basked in virtue and held an unearned respect from all, by grace of his fingers on the wounds of others ---- said the novelist who had nothing to say if the subject of service and sacrifice were to be taken away from him, who sobbed in the hearing of attentive thousands that he loved them and loved them and would they please love him a little in return ---- said the lady columnist who had just bought a country mansion because she wrote so tenderly about the little people ---- said all the little people who wanted to hear of love, the great love, the unfastidious love, the love that embraced everything, forgave everything, and permitted everything ---- said every second - hander who could not exist except as a leech on the souls of others.»

Because as he says «If I believe there is no God, that means there is nothing to discuss.»

Christ in us the HOPE of Glory in Jesus name: I am His workmanship for His Glory: God is nothing like us, that is why Paul said we need to have Christ formed in us: Little Children; I labour in birth again until Christ be formed in you: Read what I have up on Zender's site and if you still don't understand it, that means it was not meant for you to understand: Thank - you Gary; In Jesus Name Alexandria:

That's because there is no heaven and no hell and it means absolutely nothing to say that God is love.

If you are saying compassion is worth nothing and means nothing then you really need to do some serious studying.

You gonna reach behind that pillar and pull out Marshall McLuhan, um, I mean God to say «You know nothing of my work»?

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

Actually, to blasphemy against the Holy Ghost might require true faith first, so being an unbeliever and saying might not mean nothing.

After all, we are talking about knowingly given the warning and knowingly given the choice and despite that when one chooses to willfully defy and then says that the ones who administer those laws are nothing but mean, awful, dictators who are not nice to those who willfully defy the warnings when they were already warned and given the choice, does not necessarily mean that is truly case to those who administers those laws.

I understand the urge to refute the Bible, but this discovery says nothing other than the fact that we haven't found bones older than the 10th century B.C. Does that mean there are none?

well, if that means you can't / won't do it to prove for yourself, then you have nothing else to say to me.

Just because YOUR disbelief was not honest, doesn't mean that the disbelief of others is also dishonest, and it is arrogant of you to assume so and project your dishonesty on to other people of whom you know nothing about at all other than what they say in a few messages on an Internet blog.

I don't mean to say that there was nothing to these stories.

I mean, almost everyone before that point — righteous or otherwise — simply died and were buried; nothing says they went to heaven or «hell».

I know that having these things said about you is nothing new, but that does not mean they get easier to hear.

Until they're convinced we do, nothing we say means much to them.

But at the same time, even though Revelation may speak about future events, this does not mean that it has nothing to say to us today either.

Keen seems to find little if any meaning in «man - as - maker» or «man - for - others» (to say nothing of woman).

You said (paraphrasing), that in the atheists mindset, morals mean nothing to anything in the universe other than people.

If BO wins this election it means, God has abandoned USA... say hello to dark age the next 4 years, this is just the start, you ain't see nothing yet..

And it ought to be clear that to say, «God is the all,» means whatever one's view of the all implies, perhaps nothing definite whatever, for offhand we have no clear notion of the all.

This is not to say, I hasten to add, that we do not believe in anything; I mean, rather, that we hold an unshakable, if often unconscious, faith in the nothing, or in nothingness as such.

In that loss it can become obscure, and its meaning can escape the most attentive reader — to say nothing of the listener.

I think what I should have said was that «it» was better than nothing meaning to find out and get some sense of direction to take on whether to accept or not accept the existence of God.

«I don't want to say necessarily that nothing applies, but understanding Christ as a person and His very real experience of dying through capital punishment should give us a little bit more pause and reflection to think, what does it mean in the totality of the Gospel?

That does not mean, however, that everyone else should also have nothing more to say.

To be told those experiences are «platitudes and statements... that mean absolutely nothing» is, I would say, kind of harsh and hurtful.

Your being a «clinician» of psychiatry may well mean your nothing but a servile student of psychiatric conditionings... Your emboldened stance to say religion is «BS» does not fit well considering your being a clinician...

I mean this is you guy's logic, I'm not going to read the bible because it's not true and I don't believe anything in it and I'll show you that nothing is true in it by disproving what I think a book says even though I have never read it nor understand it.

Yea, bad things happen in some Churches, but to run screaming, I ain't goin to Church no more cause «I am so tired of platitudes and statements by christians that mean absolutely nothing...,» and all the other excuses, well, you pat them on the head, and say, «Oh you poor thing, I feel your pain.

When Christians say that «Jesus Christ is Lord,» meaning that since nothing else can command our total allegiance, the state and the government are not Lord, they are saying what Jews declare when they give assent to the first commandment: «You shall have no other gods before me.»

Do you think there would be many Christians saying «Well, he has no real ties to atheism, i mean he didn't even attend Richard Dawkins symposium...» and «He's just a crazy person, his ideology has nothing to do with his violence, you can't blame the bunch just because theres one bad apple...»

You know, I spent a lot of time listening to Lawrence Krauss explain his «A Universe from Nothing,» but I stopped taking him seriously when both he, and Richard Dawkins said «You can't use common sense to understand this because it doesn't make sense,» and then when he redefined what the word «nothing» means, I placed him fully into the category of one who can not be truNothing,» but I stopped taking him seriously when both he, and Richard Dawkins said «You can't use common sense to understand this because it doesn't make sense,» and then when he redefined what the word «nothing» means, I placed him fully into the category of one who can not be trunothing» means, I placed him fully into the category of one who can not be trusted...

Marty says nothing about what this challenge might mean for theological schools, whose attention to these topics will play an important role in educating the people — pastors, denominational employees, lay leaders and the like — whom he frequently singles out as important interpreters and «brokers» of the public involvement of religious groups.

Apart from the fact that Genesis says nothing (even remotely) of the sort, I would not presume to comment on the Psalms, as I have not actually studied them, except to say that I v «aguely recall the translation of the word from Hebrew to the English word «fool» is a corruption of the Hebrew term which actually means (a person who is) «morally deficient», which might cast the statement in the psalm in a slightly different light.

Perhaps, if you have nothing better to do than insult someone, you should think more on what it is you mean to say before you say it.

However, this does not mean that nothing can be said to clarify and render more precise the particular way in which one chooses to use these terms, for here one finds real and significant variety.

one of mine said «burn church» I didn't ever know of this sin until recently and knew nothing about my religion I said to him you know I didn't mean that he said yes and I never really thought about it until now I prayed God to forgive me for all of my Sins I don't even know has many times but not once thought about this I had no intention to go against him and I repented for it not long after I thought of it but what bothers me is I didn't know of this sin and wasn't ever worried I honestly had absolutely no intention behind it and never thought about it have I commited this sin?

Likewise, you saying their gods don't exist means nothing to them, either.

«Power» means it can «do» something, («doing» means it starts to «do» something, does it, and then stops doing it, (unless you are really saying it was «potentially powerful», but doing nothing), Wise means it thinks something, (starts thinking it, thinks it, stops thinking it).

It is indeed earnestness to desire it, but should it not also be earnestness to understand in oneself and in life precisely what is meant by saying that one man accomplishes such an exceptional amount, or that another man seems to accomplish nothing at all.