Sentences with phrase «said objects by»

Additionally, it also lets you track said objects by setting the Sheikah Scanner to target them.

Additionally, it also lets you track said objects by setting -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

Proponents say such laws are necessary to give businesses run by owners with strong religious principles a legal exemption should they be asked to perform a service — such as cater or photograph a same - sex wedding — to which they object.

Goman says that «you can tell if you have infringed on people's space by the way they react - stepping away, withdrawing their head or neck, angling their shoulders away, or placing an object (laptop purse, coffee cup) between the two of you.

Musk says that a giant balloon is «great for creating a giant object that retains its shape across all Mach regimes & drops ballistic coefficient by 2 orders of magnitude.»

Col. Patrick Touron of the gendarme service said DNA samples have been taken from objects provided by victims» families, such as combs or toothbrushes, that could help identify them.

«The foreign ministry seriously objects and condemns the unreasonable actions by the Nigerian government,» Taiwan said Thursday in a statement urging Nigeria to reconsider its decision.

That ruling says businesses may object on religious grounds to offering health services stipulated by the ACA, such as abortion services and fertility drugs.

Burn says many men are surrounded by a culture that reduces women to sexualized objects, which normalizes female colleague in a less than professional manner.

Update meetings also have a tendency to degenerate into BS sessions, where everyone must prove he or she is important by commenting on, or objecting to, everything that everyone else says.

Over four dozen toy manufacturers have objected to the liquidation, saying they are owed some $ 450 million by Toys «R» Us.

Asked by Trump if they would object to that, none of the tech CEOs said they would.

I would say we object to the liberal indoctrination offered by most universities now.

Is this to say that the objects known, the actual occasions which are known by subjecting them to divisions, are realities, not appearances, in the realm of being, not becoming?

Motion does not happen at random but is an action by an outside force, for Newton's laws of motion says that (1st law) that an object either remains at rest or continues to move at a constant velocity, unless acted on by an external force.

I love it when I am teaching about grace, and someone in the class objects by saying, «But if what you are saying is true, then why can't I just go sin all I want?»

As Martin Luther once said, «Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying the object which is abused.

His comments drew fire from secularists, with a letter to The Daily Telegraph signed by 50 public figures headed by the president of the British Humanist Association, Professor Jim Al - Khalili saying: «We object to his characterisation of Britain as a «Christian country» and the negative consequences for politics and society that this engenders.»

In terms of eternal objects we may say that he reaches as far as the most distant standpoint he has made relevant by associating it with a specific eternal object (thereby perhaps making that eternal object first relevant).

With a certain simplification of the state of affairs, which however brings out more clearly the decisive factor without falsifying it, we might say that formerly the object and situation of a man's action were simply data supplied by nature with which he was in contact and by simple human realities which recurred from generation to generation again and again.

In order to interpret this core - principle of revelation, we must understand its essential presupposition; namely, that events are present «in» other events - present not just abstractly (through «eternal objects»), i.e., mediated by the «general,» but as singular events that effect their further history by their unique concreteness (PR 338).12 Whitehead recognizes precisely this constellation when he says:» [T] he truism that we can only conceive in terms of universals has been stretched to mean that we can only feel in terms of universals.

The physical prehension as conformal feeling, we have said, reproduces the object by assuming the subjective form of one of its prehensions, but as vector it is, and remains throughout the «life» of the subject, an essential relation to that individual object as other, as there and then.

And Whitehead says that he does not think it is inevitable that the human mind spatializes, though it often does this, and when it does, one way or another, whether through partiality or something else, it deforms the object of knowledge and of experience... [But] Bergson believed that, at least to some significant degree, the spatializing tendencies of the human intellect and of human intelligence, can be overcome by a biology and a physics that is less mechanistic.

Each actual occasion prehends the space - time continuum in its infinite entirety; that, says Whitehead, is nothing but an example of the general principle (also illustrated by prehension of qualitative eternal objects) that «actual fact includes in its own constitution real potentiality which is referent beyond itself.»

At this point Cobb might be tempted to make one last ditch stand, arguing that I have begged the question by merely assuming that a structured society can not be an enduring object, whereas what he is saying, when he says that one regional standpoint can include another, is that one enduring entity, one nonspatial, serially ordered society, can still be a structured society in that its temporally successive occasions can include the regional standpoints of the «narrower» actual entities which make up its subordinate societies and / or nexus.

He is often said to have inaugurated the «subjective turn» — credited with recognizing that we have to start from an analysis of consciousness and treat all the «objects» of our knowledge as shaped, distorted, conditioned by our «subjective» filters.

Acts 11:4 - 18: «But Peter began speaking and proceeded to explain to them in orderly sequence, saying, «I WAS IN THE CITY OF JOPPA PRAYING; AND IN A TRANCE I SAW A VISION, an object coming down like a great sheet lowered by four corners from the sky; and it came right down to me, and when I had fixed my gaze on it and was observing it I saw the four - footed animals of the earth and the wild beasts and the crawling creatures and the birds of the air.

We boys of a later day found lost objects sometimes by catching a daddy long - legs, saying over him a formula which unfortunately can no longer be recalled, when the great insect would solemnly point one of his long legs in the supposed direction of the lost object.

No human love, it is held, even the most idealistic, can be said to embody agape, the love of God, for human love is always limited and ambiguous in its object, and is corrupted by human selfishness in its essential spirit.

For precisely all that has been said can also be objected to the doctrine of the immediate creation of every human soul in the course of history, if this creation makes of God's action in a special manner a member of the chain of created causes, even if only in regard to a particular finite being, which in contrast to others and by its special individual and temporal features has no intra - mundane ground and basis.

(The following statements are somewhat characteristic of such schools: Bethany Theological Seminary affirms that its object is «to promote the spread and deepen the influence of Christianity by the thorough training of men and women for the various forms of Christian service, in harmony with the principles and practices of the Church of the Brethren»; Augustana Theological Seminary «prepares students for the ministry of the Evangelical Lutheran Church with the special needs of the Augustana Church in view»; the charter of Berkeley Divinity School begins, «Whereas sundry inhabitants of this state of the denomination of Christians called the Protestant Episcopal Church have represented by their petition addressed to the General Assembly, that great advantages would accrue to said Church, and they hope and believe to the interests of religion and morals in general, by the incorporation of a Divinity School for the training and instructions of students for the sacred ministry in the Church aforementioned.»)

«Like the rest,» he says, «we were by nature (phusei) objects of wrath» (Ephesians 2:3).

As a first approximation, we may say that the poetic function points to the obliterating of the ordinary referential function, at least if we identify it with the capacity to describe familiar objects of perception or the objects which science alone determines by means of its standards of measurement.

Now some people will object to me saying that the Bible is absolute truth, but the United States and Canada were founded by people who believed that the Bible was a foundation that one could base their ideals on, most of are laws are taken from it.

- What can one say about the disposition of those engaged in the conversion process toward the objects of veneration in the religion currently professed by those who now seek conversion?

If we were to say in what sense the Psalter may be said to be revealed, it would certainly not be so in the sense that its praise, supplication, and thanksgiving were placed in their disparate authors» mouths by God, but in the sense that the sentiments expressed there are formed by and conform to their object.

There was a Talmudic - era rabbi by the name of Akiva ben Joseph (who argued plenty with another rabbi, Simeon ben Azzai) who argued that the greatest commandment in all of the Torah was to love your neighbor as yourself (to which ben Azzai objected primarily due to neighbor not being clear enough and then said that the greatest commandment was within Genesis 5:1 — that man was created in G - d's image and thus if you hate any person, you are hating G - d).

It may, however, be possible to answer this objection by saying that the lure of the most appropriate eternal object or set of appropriately eternal objects for the present actual occasion is itself an eternal object, one in process as are the relationships of rational thinking itself.

The Dun Commission of Christian scholars in 1950 in their report on The Christian Conscience and Weapons of Mass Destruction stated that «to accept general war as inevitable is to treat ourselves as helpless objects carried by a fated tide of events rather than as responsible men,» and went on to say, «One reason why fascism and Naziism gained their dread power over great nations was because otherwise decent people bowed before what they regarded as «inevitable» and allowed a «wave of the future» to inundate them.»

In itself, creativity is the «protean» factor in an actual entity that needs to be characterized by eternal objects before it can be said to be real.

Rabbi Menachem Genack, CEO of the largest certifier of kosher food, OU Kosher, has publically said he would not object to having the Magen Tzedek affixed to products supervised by the OU.

DE: They indicate what Whitehead would call a «route of events» — for instance, the event we call this table yesterday, and then this table a few seconds ago going on into the table now, all qualified by the object word «table,» so that we say «Here is this table again.»

The exclusive, or at least central, object of prayer is God himself, according to Augustine, Nolite aliquid a Deo quaerere nisi Deum, (Sermons, 331.4) «you shall ask of God nothing other than God Himself,» a saying quite similarly reiterated by the Persian - Islamic mystic, Sa'adi.

It is not only a reasonable hypothesis to say that «eternal object» and «nexus of successive occasions» refer to the pattern of behavioral definiteness sustained by subordinate «living persons» and the regnant society: it is also one of the few hypotheses available for avoiding the «Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness» by not making the entire nexus the locus of subjectively immediate feelings (WEP 183).

Whitehead calls the influence of an actual entity (say «a») on another actual entity («b») the functioning of «a» in regard to «b» or the prehension of «a» by «b.» In this prehension, «a» is appropriated by «b» as an (immortal) object in «b's» concrescence.

If we discard this definition of a people, and, assuming another, say that a people is an assemblage of reasonable beings bound together by a common agreement as to the objects of their love, then, in order to discover the character of any people, we have only to observe what they love... it will be a superior people in proportion as it is bound together by higher interests, inferior in proportion as it is bound together by lower.

As Smith says, «To expect a transcendental object to appear on a viewing screen wired by an epistemology that is set for control would be tantamount to expecting color to appear on a television screen that was built for black and white.

We agree with John Henry Newman, who held that the object of a university is intellectual and not moral, and we might paraphrase him by saying that the significance of the teaching of the history of religions must be intellectual and not «religious» in the traditional sense of the term.

Then someone objects, and says that the Greek is just a translation of the Lord's Aramaic, so that we, by guesswork, can efface the Greek and replace it with a supposititious original.

All human (or most of them) takes good care of first 2... but majority of human are being failed in 3... by associating partners with The Almighty... either by saying God has only beoggen son or daughter or holy spirit or monkey or cow or elephent or human or any objects and so on...