Sentences with phrase «said points here»

Much like that game, you receive points after every time you play Puyo, and are free to spend said points here.

Valesky, who was the lone senator to vote «no» during the November 2010 vote of confidence for Sampson, said the point here is to «get the three men in the room out of the room.»

Not exact matches

«It's a shame that the coffee price issue obscured the real story here for so many people, but, once again, this kind of «one - way» data point thinking led investors astray... when it was actually quite strong,» said the «Mad Money» host.

The bottom line was, I needed to know for certain if anybody would buy my sneakers!!?? The result, with what I could not possibly say in any written word, I happily point you here >> www.rekixx.com.

From here on it could reach a tipping point where you have an explosion in the e-commerce activities,» Sathirathai said.

Tim Draper was over here,» he said, pointing.

«A major sticking point is that we are not getting the type of support here [in Australia and WA] as we're getting in other countries,» he said.

«The point is, there's a lot of other things that are in the offing here that we don't even know about,» he said.

Here's what CP's director of marketing, Thuy Anh Nguyen, had to say about the finer points:

Despite having previously said he did think a deal would be possible by December, he said last night: «After my meetings here in London my main message is I am more optimistic, there is progress... That is the most important thing because the perspective from a European point of view towards London was in the last weeks not so clear.»

«Something in here,» he says, pointing toward his well - muscled chest, «told me that he was the partner I was looking for.»

And here's a word to the wise — if you have no intention of paying this person at some point for the value you think they can add to your startup, that says a lot about how valuable you think they really are.

You'll encourage a culture of empowerment by saying any job is here for the taking and simply pointing to the board when someone asks: Hey!

But here's what you hear the announcer say: «Terrence Holt redeems himself after being burned on a touchdown play...» So here's my point, I could have been deflated by giving up an earlier TD, but instead I stayed determined to help my team.

«Employees can call us and say, «Here's my scenario — help me pick the best plan,»» she says, pointing out that federal law ensures the conversation is confidential.

As one of the entrepreneurs I spoke with pointed out, «I wouldn't want to get an email from somebody I haven't spoken to in two years saying «Here's my campaign.»»

«Put it all together, and Lang says that Red Hat really just needs to rally less than three dollars from here, to $ 100, at which point he expects the stock to roar higher before temporarily running out of steam at the $ 110 area.»

«Meow Parlour is a really good starting point for people to come here and learn about some of the issues facing cats in the world today,» Ha said.

The point here is not to make major business changes on a whim based on something a customer — or even several customers — does or says.

«It just got to the point that New Brunswick said, «Well, there's just not enough benefit left here,»» Marshall says.

«We are at a very important point in the history of audio and radio, and how we move from here will define the future and where we go,» says GroupM's Wood.

by The two below videos pretty much sum up what I have to say so I will not add too much here other than the following couple of points.

On Thursday, under pressure from media, Clark's Transportation Minister, Todd Stone, now says that at some point in the future, companies like Uber «might» be here, but «not any time soon.»

«It's no secret that the general strategy here is for the allied air campaign to degrade ISIL's capabilities, their infrastructure, their weaponry, their weapons stocks, basically to put them on the defensive so at some point when Iraqi security forces are able to launch a counter-offensive,» he said.

And I guess my last minute is, I've heard the tone here and I've got to give you all the credit in the world, I could tell from the tone of we'll say the other sides sometimes when we point to our left, but when the representative from Illinois said — to quote her «Who is going to protect us from Facebook?»

Certainly the Japanese, so its all being done so — with the — Donald Trump wanting to turn around the trade deficit, you can't help but say hey maybe they are actually onto something because they have an independent central bank well --(unintelligible) the independent central bank that goes upon its course based on what its seeing here you know based on domestic economic activity, while everybody else is setting it to international standards then tariffs become the — I guess the alternative especially when the feds is raising the interest rates and they're the only central bank really raising interest rates... I know... the bank of England went half a basis point, quarter basis point and they are project to go a quarter basis point tomorrow which we will see.

Mark Whitmore: This is Mark Whitmore, I keep forgetting we have two Mark's on the line here, and Chris you absolutely interpreted what I was trying to say correctly, and kind of to follow up a little bit, I think one of the things that the other Mark pointed out is the issue of timing, and whereas the two prevailing investing paradigms out there seem to be this notion of efficient market theory which attempts to just buy and hold the market no matter what, completely price indifferent.

«The first point is there's more circumstantial evidence of bad intent here,» Waymo's attorney said.

The Confessions do not in the first place talk about God; Marion makes a great point of saying that the second grammatical person prevails here over the third person.?

(I'm not trying to say that perhaps there aren't good ones — that's really not my point here — but this certainly isn't one of them.)

Why do most theists and their non-counterparts say here this thing or there that thing when the point is made to firstly be seeking the whereabouts of God's kingdom domains..?

Why is it that theists and their non counterparts say here this thing or there that thing when the point is made to firstly seeking the whereabouts of God's kingdom domains..?

This story is here because it points out how ludicrous the act of baptizing those without a say is.

It is here, where the moral bonds of voluntary attachment have not yet been stretched beyond the breaking point, that true moral discourse can be maintained, especially, as Michael W. McConnell says, «over the highest things - matters of ultimate truth and value.»

I think by «right» here they mean the most useful choice for their business (as in decisions based on the business model — ie: profit at some point as noted in the saying).

Dear I know nothing would happen on earth with out the will of God... what ever happened or where ever prophets and messengers were before were sent to earth is not the issue since God said in the Quran that he God took the convent of all the prophets before sending them to call their people into worshipping God only and not to mislead people into worshipping them instead... This is the point here that the message was that (God is One and Only Nor he has a Mate or a Son or any Partners among Mankind or Jinn or Angels)...

My apologies, i see you did nt say all the things i reference centeredpiece, but my point remains valid to you and BobtheTomato, another off base poster on here.

I will not enter that debate here, except to say that the reflections on memory that dominate Book X have everything to do with the story that Augustine has been telling to that point.

yawn... of course we all have subjective biases... i'm honest about mine... and really, what is the point of having the samed tired debates here... you already have your opinion made up, won't truly listen and will hear anything i say through that lens

• Murasaki Shikibu, The Diary of Lady Murasaki: Needless to say, The Tale of Genji is the greatest literary achievement of the glorious Heian period of Japanese high culture, and one of the greatest novels ever written, and so I win no points for needless obscurity here, but having recommended Lady Sarashina's journal above, I would be remiss in failing to recommend Lady Murasaki's equally (but very differently) lovely collection of vignettes and meditations and acute observations (and gossip).

(For clarity, I'm not saying that about all the people mentioned here, nor intending to accuse any of them... just pointing out that they were a pool of people to draw from in repeating a message later on in 2009 and 2010.)

I did (very briefly) talk to Danielle Shroyer about that last point (years later), and she said then what she also repeated here — that she never saw any romantic behavior between Tony and Courtney prior to the divorce.

@ CQ: 1) as Kevin DeYoung pointed out less than a week later on this blog (an entry here and a longer linked article on his own blog), that article («My Take: What the Bible really says...») was rife with poor exegetical scholarship.

I think I know what you mean as I've stuck around here for awhile, but I think people could easily misunderstand you as well =) I think, the point of your post is to say (I might be wrong!)

Keep in mind that as I reply, I can't possibly say everything I need on the subject, but here goes my attempt at a couple of key points:

We will talk more about predetermination and foreordination in the future posts about Unconditional Election and the Sovereignty of God, so I don't want to use a lot of room to discuss these issues here, except to say that Scripture, reason, and experience all seem to point pretty clearly to the fact that God expects us to make wise choices and holds us accountable for the choices and decisions we make.

But my point is simply that what Alex says does not in fact hold for the vast majority of the «regular» atheist crowd in here.

More will be said on the Biblical view of man later, but it is sufficient to point out here, that it is just because the Bible hardly anywhere reflects a doctrine of an immortal soul, that the Christian hope took the form of the resurrection of the body.

I think the larger point was lost here though which is when believers make the claim for God the non-believers say «Prove it.»

Searle would respond by saying that this contradicts the ordinary language meaning of «knowing a language,» but nevertheless, the point here is one about the type of knowledge in the person operating the Box.