Not exact matches
Read faster and retain more: Train your eye to read groups of words rather than sounding out individual words in your head, known as sub-vocalizing, says Beth Moreno, a University of Texas prof who teaches speed - reading cour
Read faster and retain more: Train your eye to
read groups of words rather than sounding out individual words in your head, known as sub-vocalizing, says Beth Moreno, a University of Texas prof who teaches speed - reading cour
read groups of words rather than sounding out individual words in your head, known as sub-vocalizing,
says Beth Moreno, a University of Texas prof who
teaches speed -
reading courses.
Those that
say she's not really a Catholic like Bill — everything that I've
read or been
taught in the Church has
said that once you are baptized catholic, you're Catholic for life regardless.
If you ever
read into the context of what Jesus
said, a lot of the advice and he was giving was contrary to what's the Pharisees would have
taught.
ilsam
teaches hate i know the meaning have
read the book any book that
says the jews have earned allah wrath is not peaceful thank you
The pastor
said of what he has
read about Mourdock's remarks, they largely lined up with the church's
teachings on the sanctity of life and their belief that life begins at conception.
Lady please
read the following: 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 and 1 Timothy 4:1 it
says «Now the Spirit expressly
says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and
TEACHINGS OF DEMONS.»
I know ignorance makes people
say stupid things but as many problems it has a solution:
reading and learning!!!! Muslims will never
say anything bad about the Holy Books or about the prophets because all of them are part of Islam and it's
teachings.
The «own it but haven't
read it» demographic is his target market,
says Capes, who
teaches the New Testament at Houston Baptist University and was part of a team that compiled «The Voice,» a new translation of the King James Bible.
I would
say to any person commenting on your 10 Ways the Non-Violent Atonement Changes Your Theology blog, to
read your book first (its not an expensive purchase) before launching into any detailed discussion or disagreement.It answers many of the potential concerns people have and gets the reader to reflect very strongly on what they have been
taught about the atonement and to put on a new set of glasses when
reading scripture.
I've been
reading the monastics recently, and it strikes me that while much of modern evangelicalism echoes their
teachings on self - control and self - denial when it comes to sexuality, we tend to gloss over a lot what this great cloud of monastic witnesses has to
say about self - control and self - denial in other areas of life — like materialism, food, relationships, and hospitality.
You go on to
say that Paul
teaches that these things WERE but a shadow of things to come, when it actually
reads ARE SHADOWS, present tense not past tense.
Wonderful teacher... get out your Bible and start
reading... this guy is a wolf in sheep's clothing leading millions to an eternity in hell... the prosperity gospel he
teaches is contrary to the
teachings of Christ... Christ talked about abundance in life but he was speaking of spiritual abundance not material things... Scripture and Christ
said in this life you will have trouble... Christ suffered in this life as did each of his Apostles... open your eyes before it is too late for you.
Of course, as you
say, being the church is about so much more than just
reading,
teaching, or singing songs.
Andrea Yates, the Texas mom who drowned her five children in a bathtub in 2001, believed they «were «stumbling» into the throes of the devil and were going to burn in the fires of eternity,»
said Richard Bonnie, a University of Virginia law professor,
reading from his criminal law
teaching book.
I
say this because the Taylor uses the book of Daniel to provide practical examples of how to
read and
teach Apocalyptic Literature.
I
say «well maybe» because so much of the
teaching about sola fide comes out of a certain reformation
reading of Galatians Romans and Phillipians.
you ignored the verses I supplied because if you had
read the verses I supplied you would see they
say and
teach once a person is saved they are saved for all eternity because Jesus is the one who saves and keeps you saved.
I
read a comment that the person
said Islam
teaches «convert or be killed», which I find odd as I have been married to a muslim for 6 years now and neither her or her family have taken me out yet.
Cardinal Burke
said: «I must
say sincerely, even though I haven't
read the words of the Pope, that I don't see why the Church ought to ask forgiveness for
teaching the truth about sex and sexuality.»
Michael Zuckert, as I've also
said before, surely
teaches more truth about Locke than anyone else by
reading the account of personal identity in the ECHU into THE SECOND TREATISE and elsewhere.
Lately I have been encouraged to
read the scriptures without infusing my own thoughts, or what I've heard others
say, or
teach about the bible.
He
read what Whitehead had written as physicist and
said to himself and others, «This man should be
teaching philosophy.»
She
said the children are not only
taught how to
read and write, but also to love one another.
As a result, when they
read in Scripture what Jesus has to
say about the Kingdom, they completely misunderstand what He was
teaching because they think He was only talking about something that will affect us after we die.
Some might find it more accurate to
say that Paul
teaches so - and - so albeit recognizing the problems reconciling his words with James and even Jesus himself.Also, many have come to think that because the words attibuted to Jesus in the fourth gospel are so unlike the synoptics that it's highly unlikey to be his actual speech (via translation) and what were likely
reading is John's interpretation of who Jesus is.
I ordered this book last week & looking forward to
reading it, like you
said there is so much
teaching on this subject.
Though I own nearly 10,000 books,
read Greek and Hebrew in my study, and can use theological terms with the best of theologians, people often
say that my
teaching is easy to understand, helps them with their questions, and provides guidance for practical Christian living in this world.
He wasn't talking about me, of course, but he
said that the big problem in the church today is that people
read the Bible, they don't like what they
read, and so they reject what the Bible clearly
teaches because they prefer their own theology over the theology of the Bible.
Of course, this has some hermeneutical value in itself, as a doctrine repeated is a doctrine more firmly
taught and established; but it makes it easier for a professor to
say «Okay, let's skip that, since we've just
read something similar.»
A man who everybody
says is a good teacher, but in all honesty, when you
read His
teachings, most of them don't make much sense.
If Santa Clausism became the dominant «religion» of the country, tried to influence the government, inst / itute laws and public policies and demand that it be
taught in public education - start every school day with a
reading from «Twas the Night Before Christmas» and have «Ho Ho Ho» on your money - I'm just betting that you would have something to
say about it on an internet forum and elsewhere!
Cardinal Mueller sought to offer his own interpretation - that The Joy Of Love can only be
read as a continuity of the traditional
teaching on marriage - offering what he
said was his own «contribution to re-establishing peace in the Church.»
We have been
taught by books, pastors, seminaries, and Christian friends for so long to
read the Bible a certain way and look for certain truths in Scripture, that when someone comes along and
says, «Yeah, but did you notice the gorilla in the text?»
It's easy to
read, perform, or
teach Othello as Shakespeare's race play — with, I should
say, good cause.
I should also
say that my parents never attended church, but
taught me to
read from the Bible before I attended school, and the Creator was never only male.
If one
read in Isaiah 40 vs. 13, YHWH tells us of this servant who will work for Him, and that YHWH is who
taught him, and counseled, and instructed him, he is the arm of YHWH, then you go to Isaiah 40 vs. 18, and 25, 28, of who YHWH is, and that we are not to compare Him to no one, for in Isaiah 40vs.22, YHWH
says He is who sits on the circle of the earth.
The Christian Post «s Dr. Geoff Tunnicliffe, however, praised the series,
saying «For someone that has
read and
taught the Bible for most of his life, I had a remarkable spiritual and emotional experience.
I
read this article by charisma magazine which i thought was well written which is pro Women preaching http://www.charismamag.com/blogs/fire-in-my-bones/16851-why-i-defend-women-preachers This debate is an on going one John Piper who i respect as a bible preacher believes that scripture is clear women shouldnt have authority over men or
teach in the church some go as far as
saying women shouldnt preach in sunday school if the classes are mixed.Personally i think times are changing and i
say that because i have a women manager she has authority over me and other men so if we follow the biblical example i shouldnt allow myself to be in that situation which is just crazy thinking.
Read and practise the Bible's
teaching or as I
said there are secular books like THINK AND GROW RICH for u.
I can't for the life of me recall what book I
read it in, but I remember an author
saying once that he raised his children to be wary of consumerism by
teaching them to laugh at commercials.
Linnane
said people who
read the book knew that Farley was departing from Catholic
teaching in certain areas.
Now, some will certainly notice that this
teaching by Jesus is immediately followed by a reference to creation: «Haven't you
read,» Jesus
said, «That at the beginning the Creator made them male and female, and for this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh?»
The bottom line was that this pastor didn't like what I was
saying, and therefore, didn't like that people were
reading what I was
teaching, and viewed any form of trying to get my message out as self - promotion.
Things that others have
said,
read or that are being
taught in public are all taken in and the idea develops into something that has been distilled and considered by the introvert.
I guess your «bible» leaves out the last few verses in Matthew where Christ commissioned the church to «make disciples» of all nations,
teaching them...» I
say so because your ad nauseum rants will not lead to the conviction, repentance, and salvation of one soul... unless someone happens to
read your diatribes and
say «OH GOD, there must be something better than this, please show me the way»!
you borrowed HeavenSent's statements that
says, «You prove that you don't know this truth written in Jesus»
teachings (the Bible) which He wants all to
read, comprehend and abide...»
I would ask anyone to
read through those gospels and tell me what I am
saying is not close to the mark — you wil felt you have been
taught by a «rabbi» (teacher)-- and he's offering guidance on principles from a place where God exists.
Do you
read your Bible?This is what the Lord Jesus
said, John 14:26 KJV But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall
teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have
said unto you.
So it is a profound
teaching when Jesus instructs us to think about the law of marriage by
reading what is
said of the Creator in Genesis 1, that in the beginning «he made them male and female» (Matt.
Her efforts culminated in a massive silent protest outside the Presidential Palace, where women wearing white T - shirts and dresses demanded a resolution to the conflict, issuing a statement that
read: «In the past we were silent, but after being killed, raped, dehumanized, and infected with diseases, and watching our children and families destroyed, war has
taught us that the future lies in
saying NO to violence and YES to peace!